The rebuttal of pro-IP arguments
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2014.012aRésumé
In this paper I will argue that intellectual property rights are unjustifiable. I shall demonstrate not only that they would violate tangible property rights but also that last-resort utilitarian arguments in favour of them are inconclusive at best. The paper will assume the form of a sort of imaginary debate where the arguments by IP advocates (mostly utilitarian ones) will be anticipated and replied. Furthermore, the paper shall include a word of concession saying that, if anything, there are better reasons (however feeble) to protect works of arts than inventions.
Références
Boldrin M. and Levine D.K., Against Intellectual Monopoly, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Friedman D., Hidden Order, HarperBusiness, 1998.
Hoppe H.-H., A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1989.
Kim J., Philosophy of Mind, Westview Press, 1998.
Kinsella S., Against Intellectual Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2008.
Locke J., Second Treatise of Government, Hackett Publishing, 1980.
Palmer T.G., Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach, Hamline Law Review 12, 1989.
Parfit D., On What Matters vol.II, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Rand A., Capitalism: The unknown ideal, New American Library, New York 1967.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 437
Number of citations: 0
