Time Preference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2015.011Abstrakt
This paper has the following logical structure. First, I am trying to demonstrate how various theories of identity relate to the universal fact of time preference. Second, I will argue for the validity and superiority of psychological theory of identity to other theories and it will be shown that the psychological theory of identity can in principle explain the otherwise inexplicable brute universal fact of time preference. Third, after Nozick, the methodology is presented, in which it is claimed that when there are two distinct realms, the framework of one can serve as the explicans for the other. Thus, there is no danger of any logical fallacies, the most haunting one being vicious circle and even if the more fundamental realm is not the factually true explanation of the realm being in need of explanation it can greatly illuminate the latter. Finally, some implications of psychological theory of identity for the idea of time preference will be elucidated.Bibliografia
Dennett D., Consciousness Explained, Back Bay Books, 1992.
McMahan J., The Ethics of Killing, Oxford University Press, 2012.
Nozick R., Anarchy State and Utopia, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2014.
Parfit D., Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1986.
Quinton A., The Soul in J. Perry Personal Identity, University of California Press, Berkeley 1972.
Rothbard M., Man, Economy and State, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
2016-03-29
Jak cytować
1.
WYSOCKI, Igor. Time Preference. Dialogi Polityczne [online]. 29 marzec 2016, nr 18, s. 123–130. [udostępniono 21.3.2025]. DOI 10.12775/DP.2015.011.
Numer
Dział
Articles
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 440
Liczba cytowań: 0