Rejoinder to Dominiak’s rejoinder to my rejoinder to his paper on Brain Death

Resumen

This is a rejoinder to above Dominiak's rejoinder. First and foremost, I am flattered that Dominiak found my rejoinder fit for his rejoinder. As usual, the said author’s incisiveness is literally second to none. Dominiak is rightly distinguished for his almost animal instinct for spotting performative inconsistencies and, alas, surprise-surprise, I was the one who could not escape the said logical fallacy. I am equally delighted to have been welcomed to have my own say in turn and reply with yet another rejoinder, which I am hereby happily and promptly embarking on. On the other hand, being granted the privilege of the last word being on me, I will try to be mild and try to refrain from any ironic overtones. As they say, It’s not in my nature to kick a man when he is down. Therefore, in the order corresponding to Dominiak’s rejoinder, I will try to concede some points to Dominiak and still argue about the ones on which I still remain unconvinced.