The energy diplomacy of Ukraine as an effective and powerful tool for improving national energy security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2018.003Słowa kluczowe
energy diplomacy, gas transportation system, transit country, Ukraine, energy strategy, national energy securityAbstrakt
This article reveals the essence of energy diplomacy in Ukraine to be an effective and powerful tool for improving national energy security. The focus lies on an analysis of the European energy diplomacy rules that presuppose the ability to take into account the interests of all parties, including the interests of Ukraine, which comply with European legislation and should be considered as an integral part of the EU gas market. With a powerful resource, it is a transit country for’ the transportation of gas, Ukraine needs to concentrate all its efforts on maintaining the status of a geopolitical player. However, playing by European rules requires compliance with European standards on the organization of gas production and transportation. Currently, Ukraine has been developing an proactive energy diplomacy strategy that faces external challenges and threats. While playing a crucial role as a strategic geopolitical gas transit country, Ukraine requires the use of proactive strategies to advance the agenda for European energy security. To conclude, it is necessary that Ukraine should vigorously develop suitable energy diplomacy as an effective tool for improving energy security both on the national and European levels.
Bibliografia
A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy. (2015, Feb 25). Brussels, 25.2.2015 COM(2015) 80 final. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1bd46c90-bdd4-11e4-bbe1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.03/DOC_1&format=PDF
Agreement on an International Energy Program. (2007). Retrieved from https://www.ebv-oil.org/cms/pdf/iep.pdf
Ahmed, G., Abdulsamd, A., Gereffi, G. & Daly, J. (2014). What Role Can Coal Play in the United States Energy Future? The Electricity Journal, 27(3), 87–95.
Ajansı, A. (2019, Nov 30). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Hiçbir ülke uluslararası hukuktan üstün değil. NTV. Retrieved from https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hicbir-ulke-uluslararasi-hukuktan-ustun-degil,hqpAsEth-UahVFBIhZHSqg
Annual report 2017. A historic victory and the beginning of the transformation of the [national joint campaign NAFOGAZ of Ukraine]. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/Zvity/NAK_AnRep2017_UA.pdf
Annual report 2018. Strengthen yourself –Ukraine [national joint campaign NAFOGAZ of Ukraine]. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/Zvity/Annual-Report-2018-ukr.pdf
Annual Report and Form 20-F 2016. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.equinor.com/en/investors/our-dividend/annual-reports-archive.html
Annual report of 2016. The first stirrings of the [national joint campaign NAFOGAZ of Ukraine]. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/Zvity/Anual_report_ukr_170608.pdf
AR 2016. First Sprouts [National Joint-stock Naftogaz, Ukraine]. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/Zvity/Anual_report_ukr_170608.pdf
Auer, J. (2007). EU Energy Policy: High Time for Action! Deutsche Bank Research, EU Monitor, vol. 44. Retrieved from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/deutsche_bank_eu_energy_policy.pdf
Bayou, C. (2007). L’europe et la diplomatie énergétique du pouvoir russe défiances et dépendances. Revue Internationale Et Strategique, 68(4), 175-186.
BP. (2019). BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-full-report.pdf
Briefing EU Legislation in Progress. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/599243/EPRS_BRI(2017)599243_EN.pdf
Chaban, N., & Knod, M. (2015). Energy diplomacy in the context of multistakeholder diplomacy: The EU and BICS. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(4), 457–474.
Cleutinx, C., & Piper J. (2008). The EU-Russia Energy Dialogue. In Pipelines, Politics and Power: The Future of EU-Russia Energy Relations (pp. 25–33). London: Centre for European Reform.
Constantinou C., Kerr P., & Sharp P. (Eds.). (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. Sousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
Delivery statistics. Gas supplies to Europe. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.gazpromexport.ru/en/statistics/
Description of the gas-transport system of Ukraine. (2019). Retrieved from http://utg.ua/utg/gts/description/
Energy: Resources and Markets. Turkish Stream what Strategy for Europe. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/113951/1/NDL2015-050.pdf
Final Award. SCC Arbitration no. V2014/129. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/media/Transit%20Award_Redacted.pdf
Gas prices by type of user. EUR per gigajoule. Data browser. Beta. (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ten00118/default/table?lang=en
Karnitschnig, M. (2017, Dec 12). Germany revives Putin’s pipeline dream. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-revives-putins-pipeline-dream/
Goldstone, P. R. (2007). Pax Mercatoria – Does Economic Interdependence Bring Peace? The Audit of Conventional Wisdom, 7, 1–4.
GTS of Ukraine assesses risks from Turkish Stream. (2019, Aug 28). Unian. Retrieved from https://www.unian.ua/economics/energetics/10664901-operator-gts-ukrajini-ociniv-riziki-vid-tureckogo-potoku.html
Hartley, P., & Medlock III K. (2006). The Baker Institute World Gas Trade Model. In D. Victor, A. Jaffe & M. Hayes (Eds.), Natural Gas and Geopolitics: From 1970 to 2040 (pp. 357–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
International Energy Agency. Energy security. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/
Joint open letter regarding Nord Stream 2. Brussels, 5 November 2018. (2018). Retrieved from https://reinhardbuetikofer.eu/2018/11/06/gemeinsamer-offener-brief-zu-nord-stream-2/10
Klimkin: no return to “contractors” with Russia on gas transit [Video]. (2019, Jan 21). Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/29722858.html
Kobolyev, A. (2019). Russia is looking for a way out after a double loss in Stockholm. Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/2624188-evrokomisia-zrobila-cikavu-tranzitnu-propoziciu-naftogaz.html
Larsson, R. (2006). Russia’s Energy Policy: Security Dimensions and Russia’s Reliability as an Energy Supplier. Retrieved from http://www2.foi.se/rapp/foir1934.pdf
McSweeney, B. (1996). Review: Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School, Review of International Studies, 22(1), 81–93.
MEPs want deeper EU ties with Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. (2017, Nov 7). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/priorities/ukraine/20171030STO87111/meps-want-deeper-eu-ties-with-ukraine-georgia-and-moldova
Miller: Turkish Stream will replace transit through Ukraine. (2015, Jan 14). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/russian/rolling_news/2015/01/150114_rn_gazprom_turkey_eu
Mitrova, T., Pirani, S., & Sharples, J. (2019, Nov). Russia-Ukraine gas transit talks: risks for all sides. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Russia-Ukraine-gas-transit-talks-risks-for-all-sides-Insight-60.pdf?v=3943d8795e03
Naftogaz. Annual Report 2014. Changes for the Future. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.naftogaz.com/files/Zvity/Naftogaz%20Annual%20Report%202014.pdf
National Permitting Processes. Nord Stream 2 AG. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.nord-stream2.com/ru/dlia-pressy/dokumenty/?page=6
Pirani, S., Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2009). The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a Comprehensive Assessment. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Proedrou, F. (2017). Revisiting pipeline politics and diplomacy: from energy security to domestic politics explanations. Problems of Post-Communism, 2, 1–10.
Prozorov, S. (2018). Turkish stream. Gazprom. Gazprom Corporate Magazine, 12, 6–10.
Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy-Providing Security in a Changing World (11 December 2008, S407/08). Brussels: the European Council. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/104630.pdf
Russian-US Energy Ministers Meetings. (2018). Retrieved from http://theopinion.net/russian-us-energy-ministers-meetings?action=print
Schmitt, B. L. (2019, Dec 9). The Neue Ostpolitik approach to Nord Stream 2: A legal fiction carried a little too far. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/the-neue-ostpolitik-approach-to-nord-stream-2-a-legal-fiction-carried-a-little-too-far/
Scott, R. (1994) IEA. The first 20 years. Vol. 1. Origins and structure. Paris: OECD/IEA. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/media/about/1ieahistory.pdf
Šefčovič, M. (2019, Jan 21). Statement by Vice-President for Energy Union Maroš Šefčovič following the trilateral talks with Russia and Ukraine on the future of gas transit via Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/STATEMENT_19_562
Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. (2016). Retrieved from http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
Simoniya, N. & Torkunov, A. (2015). The European Union’s Energy Security and Russia. Social Sciences. Quarterly Journal of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2, 78–89.
Study of the EU’s energy diplomacy: Transatlantic and foreign policy implications. (2016). Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/02c52db6-e8f1-41f6-84c2-bc354bf098fd
The EU has proposed a scheme for a transit agreement between Ukraine and Russia – Orgel. (2019, Oct 28). Ukrainska Pravda. Retrieved from https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2019/10/28/653064/
Timeline: Parliament’s continued support for Ukraine. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/priorities/ukraine/20170324STO68409/timeline-parliament-s-continued-support-for-ukraine
Trilateral Gas Talks with Russia and Ukraine. Press briefing by Vice-President Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ following the Trilateral Gas Talks with Russia and Ukraine [Video]. (2019, Oct 28). Retrieved from https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/topnews/M-003546
Zhiznin, S. (2010). Russian energy diplomacy and international energy security (geopolitics and economics). Baltic Region, 1, 7–17.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 330
Liczba cytowań: 0