Morphometry-based flood hazard zonation of Ajay River basin using coupled TOPSIS–VIKOR models, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/bgeo-2025-0009Keywords
MCDM, Geomorphic Analysis, AHP, Flood Hazard MappingAbstract
The main aim of the study is to delineate flood-hazard-prone zones in the Ajay River basin using advanced multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) models. TOPSIS and VIKOR are the two models which were employed, due to their complex decision-making ability and efficient integration of multiple influencing factors. The Ajay River is a severely flood-prone river; flooding of the river is concentrated within the monsoon season, triggered by successive episodes of the high-intensity monsoonal precipitation that inundates the lower floodplain. Post-independence, the river has experienced several flood events, which continue to constitute a major issue in the lower floodplain of the river. Fourteen flood conditioning factors, i.e. drainage density, drainage texture, drainage frequency, Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), confluence density, soil type, geology, elevation, relief, dissection index, ruggedness, slope, length of overland flow and infiltration number, were used to generate the final flood hazard maps. Parameter weightages were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The two models showed very similar results; while the TOPSIS model classified 8% and 24% of the basin area as highly and very highly hazard-prone, respectively, the VIKOR model assigned 10% and 23% of the basin area to the same respective classes. These areas are spread throughout the floodplains of the lower Ajay River basin. The validation flood points were obtained from the annual flood report of West Bengal (2023). The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve method was used, and both models revealed high accuracy, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.827 and 0.837. These results confirm the models' suitability for similar environmental conditions, making them valuable tools for strategic flood-hazard management planning in the study area.
References
ANTWI-AGYAKWA KT, AFENYO MK and ANGNUURENG DB, 2023, Know to predict, forecast to warn: a review of flood risk prediction tools. Water 15(3): 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030427.
BANDYOPADHYAY S, KAR NS, DAS S and SEN J, 2014, River systems and water resources of West Bengal: a review. Geological Society of India special publication 3(2014): 63-84.
BRAUERS WK and ZAVADSKAS EK, 2006, The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and cybernetics 35(2): 445-469.
CHOWDHURY MS, 2024, Flash flood susceptibility mapping of north-east depression of Bangladesh using different GIS based bivariate statistical models. Watershed Ecology and the Environment 6: 26-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2024.01.001.
DEBNATH J, SAHARIAH D, MAZUMDAR M, LAHON D, MERAJ G, HASHIMOTO S and others, 2023, Evaluating flood susceptibility in the brahmaputra river basin: an insight into Asia's Eastern Himalayan floodplains using machine learning and multi-criteria decision-making. Earth Systems and Environment 7(4): 733-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-023-00355-z.
DEVANAND MR and KUNDAPURA S, 2021, Flood inundation mapping of harangi river basin, kodagu, using GIS techniques and HEC-RAS model. Trends in Civil Engineering and Challenges for Sustainability: Select Proceedings of CTCS 2019: 665-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6828-2_49.
DI BALDASSARRE G, MONTANARI A, LINS H, KOUTSOYIANNIS D, BRANDIMARTE L and BLÖSCHL G, 2010, Flood fatalities in Africa: from diagnosis to mitigation. Geophysical research letters 37(22). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045467.
DUAN Y, 2024, Global projections of flood risk under climate change (No. EGU24-7030). Copernicus Meetings.
DUAN Y, XIONG J, CHENG W, LI Y, WANG N, SHEN G and YANG J, 2022, Increasing global flood risk in 2005–2020 from a multi-scale perspective. Remote Sensing 14(21): 5551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215551.
GHORABAEE MK, AMIRI M, SADAGHIANI JS and ZAVADSKAS EK, 2015, Multi-criteria project selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 14(05): 993-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201550023X.
GHORABAEE MK, AMIRI M, ZAVADSKAS EK, TURSKIS Z and ANTUCHEVICIENE J, 2017, A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Computers & Industrial Engineering 112: 156-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017.
GLAS H, ROCABADO I, HUYSENTRUYT S, MAROY E, SALAZAR CORTEZ D, COOREVITS K and others, 2019, Flood risk mapping worldwide: A flexible methodology and toolbox. Water 11(11): 2371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112371.
GUPTA L and DIXIT J, 2022, A GIS-based flood risk mapping of Assam, India, using the MCDA-AHP approach at the regional and administrative level. Geocarto International 37(26): 11867-11899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2060312.
KADER Z, ISLAM MR, AZIZ MT, HOSSAIN MM, ISLAM MR, MIAH M and JAAFAR WZW, 2024, GIS and AHP-based flood susceptibility mapping: a case study of Bangladesh. Sustainable Water Resources Management 10(5): 170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01081-8.
KHOSRAVI K, SHAHABI H, PHAM BT, ADAMOWSKI J, SHIRZADI A, PRADHAN B and PRAKASH I, 2019, A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology 573: 311-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073.
MALIK S, PAL SC, ARABAMERI A, CHOWDHURI I, SAHA A, CHAKRABORTTY R and others, 2021, GIS-based statistical model for the prediction of flood hazard susceptibility. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 16713-16743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01375-3.
MITRA R and DAS J, 2023, A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(6): 16036-16067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23167-6.
MITRA R, SAHA P and DAS J, 2022, Assessment of the performance of GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach for flood modelling in Uttar Dinajpur district of West Bengal, India. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 13(1): 2183-2226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2112094.
POURGHASEMI HR and RAHMATI O, 2018, Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision? Catena 162: 177-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022.
POURGHASEMI HR, KARIMINEJAD N, AMIRI M, EDALAT M, ZARAFSHAR M, BLASCHKE T and CERDA A, 2020, Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Scientific reports 10(1): 3203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60191-3.
PRASOJO OA, HURST MD, WILLIAMS RD, NAYLOR LA and TONEY J, 2024, Slowing down the tidal flood wave is the key to reducing tidal flood risk in estuaries worldwide (No. EGU24-17737). Copernicus Meetings.
ROY S, 2012, Spatial Variation of Floods in the Lower Ajay River Basin, West Bengal: A Geo-Hydrological Analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS 1(2): 132-143.
SARKAR D and MONDAL P, 2020, Flood vulnerability mapping using frequency ratio (FR) model: a case study on Kulik river basin, Indo-Bangladesh Barind region. Applied Water Science 10(1): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1102-x.
SHAH AI and PAN ND, 2024, Flood susceptibility assessment of Jhelum River Basin: A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR and EDAS methods. Geosystems and Geoenvironment 3(4): 100304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geogeo.2024.100304.
THAKKAR JJ and THAKKAR JJ, 2021, Technique for order preference and similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Multi-Criteria Decision Making: 83-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_8.
VASHIST K and SINGH KK, 2024, Flood hazard mapping using GIS‐based AHP approach for Krishna River basin. Hydrological Processes 38(6): e15212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15212.
YESILNACAR EK, 2005, The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey. University of Melbourne, Department.
ZHRAN M, GHANEM K, TARIQ A, ALSHEHRI F, JIN S, DAS J and others, 2024, Exploring a GIS-based analytic hierarchy process for spatial flood risk assessment in Egypt: a case study of the Damietta branch. Environmental Sciences Europe 36(1): 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00936-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shanku Ghosh, Chakkaravarthi Parakasm

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 109
Number of citations: 0