The Interplay of Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Poetic Texts

Masako K. Hiraga

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/ths.2002.008

Abstract


This essay attempts to clarify the interrelationship between the notions of metaphor and iconicity in the theory of cognitive metaphor, particularly in the model of ‘blending’ (Turner and Fauconnier 1995, in press, Fauconnier and Turner 1996, Turner 1996, 1998, among others). In cognitive and semiotic terms, ‘icons’ and ‘metaphors’ share that property of signification ‘motivated’ by similarity. Connecting things of similarity is one of the basic operations of the human mind. The treatment of metaphor and iconicity in an interrelated fashion will provide a more cohesive and integrated explanation of various linguistic phenomena. The list of such phenomena includes word formation, word order, grammaticalisation, semantic change, poetic discourse, signed languages and writing systems, as manifestations of the interplay between metaphor and iconicity. This study shows that poetic texts, in particular, serve as an optimal example in this exploration because in poetic discourse, the interplay of metaphor and iconicity is foregrounded rather than backgrounded as in everyday discourse (Jakobson and Waugh 1979). This paper, therefore, aims to contribute in the following two issues. Firstly, theoretical clarification of the interplay of metaphor and iconicity will be given in cognitive terms. Particularly, with the model of blending, we can specify which part(s) of the metaphorical process - whether the input, generic, or blended spaces - relate(s) to the iconic mapping of form and meaning. Secondly, the analysis will demonstrate how the interplay of metaphor and iconicity is manifested in linguistic signs in general, and in poetic texts in particular. It will be claimed that there are two major types of manifestation: (i) that there are iconic moments in metaphor; and (ii) that a form acquires an iconic meaning via metaphor.

Keywords


metaphor; iconicity; cognitive metaphor; poetic texts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, D. 1984. “Peirce on Metaphor”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 20(4), 453-468.

Bennett, J. 1963. Five Metaphysical Poets. 3’d Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bolinger, D. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.

Danesi, M. 1995. “The Iconicity of Metaphor”. In Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension, ed. Marge E. Landesberg, 265-284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Freeman, D. C. 1978a. “Syntax and Romantic Poetics”. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Linguists, eds. Wolfgang U. Dressier and Wolfgang Meid, 654-657. Innsbruck: lnnsbrucker Beitrage zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Freeman, D. C. 1978b. Keat’s ‘To Autumn’: Poetry as Process ad Pattern. Language and Style 11, 3-17.

Freeman, D. C. 1993. ‘According to My Bond’: King Lear and Re-Cognition. Language and Literature 2(1), 1-18.

Freeman, M. In press. “Poetry and the Scope of Metaphor: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literature.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, ed. Antonio Barcelona. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Haiman, J. 1985a. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Haiman, J.. Ed. 1985b. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. “The Construction of Knowledge and Value in the Grammar of Scientific Discourse, with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species." In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed., Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge.

Harris, R. 1995. The Signs of Writing. London: Routledge.

Herbert, G. 1880 [1633]. “Easter Wings.” The Temple. Cambridge: T. Buck and R. Daniel, Printers to the University of Cambridge.

Haiman, J. 1994[ 1633]. “Easter Wings.” The Works of George Herbert, 35. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.

Higgins, D. 1977. George Herbert’s Pattern Poems in Their Tradition. Unpublished Editions. West Glover, Vermont and New York.

Hiraga, M. K. 1994. “Diagrams and Metaphors: Iconic Aspects in Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 22(1), 5-21.

Hiraga, M. K. In press, 1999a. ‘“Blending’ and an Interpretation of Haiku: A Cognitive Approach.” Poetics Today.

Hiraga, M. K. In press, 1999b. “Rough Sea and the Milky Way: ‘Blending’ in a Haiku Text.” In Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents, ed. Chrystopher Nehaniv, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Hkobson, R. 1971 (1966) J. “Quest for the Essence of Language.” In Selected Writings 11, 345-359. The Hague: Mouton.

Jakobson, R. and L. R. Waugh. 1979. The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. Andrew Ortony, 202-251. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Peirce, Ch. S. 1955(1902]. “Logic and Semiotic: Theory of Signs.” Philosophical Writings, ed. Buehler, Justus, 98-119. New York: Dover.

Reddy, Michael. 1970. “The Conduit Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. Andrew Ortony. Cambridge University Press.

Ross, J. R. To appear. “The Taoing of a Sound: Phonetic Drama in William Blake’s The Tyger.” In Phonosymbolism and Poetic Language, ed. Patrizia Violi. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.

Shelley, P. B. 1904(1820]. “Love’s philosophy.” In The Golden Treasury, ed. Francis T. Palgrave. London: MacMillan.

Summers, J. 1954. George Herbert: His Religion and Art. London: Chatto and Windus. Taub, S. 1997. Language in the Body. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Turner, M. 1998. “Figure.” In Figurative Language and Thought, eds. Albert N. Katz. Cristina Cacciari, Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. and Mark Turner, 44-87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Turner, M, and Gilles Fauconnier. 1995. “Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression.' Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(3), 183-204.

Turner, M. In Press, 1999. “A Mechanism of Creativity.” Poetics Today.

Tuve, R. 1952. A Reading of George Herbert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Walker, J. D. 1962. “The Architectonics of George Herbert’s The Temple.” English Literar History 29, 289-306.

Waugh, L. R. 1992. “Presidential Address: Let’s t Take the Con out of the Iconici: Constraints on Iconicity in the Lexicon.” American Journal of Semiotics 9, 7-48.

Waugh, L. R. 1994. “Degrees of Iconicity in the Lexicon.” Journal of Pragmatics 22( 1 u 55-70.

Westerweel, B. 1984. Patterns and Patterning: A Study of Four Poems by George Herbc~L Amsterdam: Rodopi.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





ISSN 2392-1196 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism