Institutional and legal approach to eldercare versus sustainable work concept in selected European Union countries

Agnieszka Furmańska-Maruszak, Katarzyna Kamińska

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2018.018

Abstract


Motivation: European societies face the problem of ageing populations and shrinking labour force. One of the ways to tackle this issue is the development of sustainable approach towards work. Sustainable work means creating such living and working conditions that they enable people to remain in employment throughout their extended working life. It requires gaining adequate skills, adjusting working conditions for elder workers’ needs as well as helping them balance work and life. Family obligations are not only related to childcare but also to eldercare given to parents, step-parents or spouses. The balance between work and care might be supported both at the enterprise and the institutional level.

Aim: The article aims to examine the legal and institutional approach to care for the elderly in the selected EU countries (Germany, the UK, Finland and Poland) and to answer the question to what extent these institutions and laws support the concept of sustainable work.

Results: The extent to which national institutions and laws support sustainable work concept differ between countries, depending on the welfare model they represent. Finland represents Nordic welfare model in which publicly organised and financed eldercare is very generous, so sustainable work model is easy to put in practice. German welfare state also has its social policy well developed, and care systems are supported by the universal long-term care insurance. The UK is an example of a more liberal regime, in which sustainable work concept is more market-driven. Polish efforts to follow the German model with reference to social insurance are still under public debate. However, we doubt whether German solutions are possible to be introduced in Polish conditions due to the different position of trade unions in this country, less importance of employee participation in company management than in Germany, and definitely less than in Germany the regulation of the labor market. In Poland, informal institutions, such as family and cultural customs, play a much greater role in organizing help in the care of an elderly person. Formal institutions play a smaller role in the organization of this care. We propose to take some solutions at the national and enterprise level to raise awareness of the need to take steps to address the issue of support for employees caring for an elderly person.


Keywords


sustainable work; social policy; long-term care insurance; eldercare

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boele-Woelki, K., Braat, B., Curry-Sumner, I. (Eds.). (2005). European family law in action. Volume III: parental responsibilities. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from http://intersentia.com.

Boeri, T., & van Ours, J. (2008). The economics of imperfect labour markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Cabrita, J. (2017). Developments in working time 2015–2016. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu.

Calvano, L. (2015). Balancing eldercare and work. In R.J. Burke, C.L. Cooper, & A.G. Antoniou (Eds.), The multigenerational and aging workforce. Challeng-es and opportunities. Cheltenham–Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Colombo, F. (2012). Typology of public coverage for long-term care in OECD Countries. In J. Costa-Font, & C. Courbage (Eds.), Financing long-term care in Europe. Institutions, markets and models. Palgrave Macmillan: London. doi:10.1057/9780230349193.

Colombo, F., Llena-Nozali, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264097759-en.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton–New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Eurofound. (2015). Sustainable work over the life course: concept paper. Luxem-bourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/281708.

Eurofound. (2016a). Sustainable work throughout the life course: national policies and strategies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/874170.

Eurofound. (2016b). Working time developments in the 21st century: work duration and its regulation in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the Europe-an Union. doi:10.2806/947659.

Eurofound. (2017). Developments in working time 2015–2016. Luxembourg: Publi-cations Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/958139.

European Commission. (2016a). ESPN thematic report on work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives: Finland. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from http://ec.europa.eu.

European Commission. (2016b). ESPN thematic report on work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives: Germany. Re-trieved 28.08.2017 from http://ec.europa.eu.

European Commission. (2016c). ESPN thematic report on work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives: Poland. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from http://ec.europa.eu.

European Commission. (2016d). ESPN thematic report on work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives: UK. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from http://ec.europa.eu.

Familienpflegezeitgesetz vom 6. Dezember 2011 [The Family Care Leave Act of 11 December 2011] (BGBl. I S. 2564) (Germany).

Gesetz über die Pflegezeit vom 28. Mai 2008 [The Home Care Leave Act of 28 May 2008] (BGBl. I S. 874, 896) (Germany).

Gesetz zur besseren Vereinbarkeit von Familie, Pflege und Beruf vom 23. Dezember 2014 [Act on Better Compatibility of Family, Care and Work of 23 December 2014] (BGB1.I S.2462) (Germany).

Hieda, T. (2012). Political institutions and elderly care policy. Comparative politics of long-term care in advanced democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lamura, G., Mnich, E., Nien, B., Krevers, B., McKee, K., Mestheneos, E., & Dohner, H. (2007). Dimensions of future social service provision in the ageing societies of Europe. Advances of Gerontology, 20(3).

Leichsenring, K., Billings, J., & Nies, H. (Eds.). (2013). Long-term care in Eu-rope. Improving policy and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137032348.

OECD. (2017). Long-term care. Retrieved 28.08.2017 from http://www.oecd.org.

Thrasher, G.R., Zabel, K., Wynne, K., & Baltes, B.B. (2016). The importance of workplace motived in understanding work-family issues for older work-ers. Working, Ageing and Retirement, 2(1). doi:10.1093/workar/wav021.








ISSN 1898-2255 (print)
ISSN 2392-1625 (online)

Partnerzy platformy czasopism