ANALYSIS OF DECENTRALISATION PROJECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF RESOLVING THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE

Olesia Kompaniiiets

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/cjps.2015.01.10

Abstrakt


The article discusses three decentralisation designs considered by either of the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine as instrumental in resolving the crisis: the devolution of power to local territorial communities, territorial autonomy of Donbas, and the federalisation of the state. While each of the decentralisation projects bears risks for territorial integrity and long-term development given the current level of state capacity, only the devolution of power to local territorial communities, if properly implemented, will delegitimise claims of the rebel groups in the Donbas region, prevent any secession attempts in the future, and strengthen the state.


Słowa kluczowe


decentralisation; devolution of powers; federalisation; state capacity; territorial autonomy; the Ukraine crisis

Pełny tekst:

PDF

Bibliografia


Agranoff, R. (2004). Autonomy, devolution and intergovernmental relations. Regional and Federal Studies, 14(1), pp. 26–65.

Black, A. (1997). Communal democracy and its history. Political Studies, 45(1), pp. 5–20.

Boone, C. (2003). Decentralization as political strategy in West Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4), pp. 355–380.

Brancati, D. (2006). Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism? International Organization, 60(3), pp. 651–685.

Bunce, V. (1999). Subversive institutions: The design and the destruction of socialism and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cederman, L., Gleditsch, K., Salehyan, I. & Wucherpfennig, J. (2013). Transborder ethnickin and civil war. International Organization, 67(2), pp. 389–410.

Coakley, J. (1994). Approaches to the resolution of ethnic conflict: The strategy of nonterritorial autonomy. International Political Science Review, 15(3), pp. 297–314.

Cornell, S. (2002). Autonomy as a source of conflict – Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspective. World Politics, 54(2), pp. 245–276.

Danspeckgruber, W. (2005). Self-governance plus regional integration: A possible solution to self-determination claims. In M. Weller & S. Wolff. Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies (pp. 26–48). Abingdon: Routledge.

Elazar, D. (1997). Contrasting unitary and federal systems. International Political Science Review, 18(3), pp. 237–251.

Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), pp. 379– 414.

Fleurke, F. & Willemse, R. (2004). Approaches to decentralization and local autonomy: A critical appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), pp. 523–544.

Gagnon, A. & Keating, M. (2012). Political Autonomy and Divided Societies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ghai, Y. (2000). Ethnicity and Autonomy: A Framework for Analysis. In Y. Ghai (Ed.) Autonomy and ethnicity: Negotiating competing claims in multi-ethnic states (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hooghe, L. (1993). Belgium: From regionalism to federalism. Regional Politics and Policy, 3(1), pp. 44–68.

Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hughes, J. & Sasse, G. (2001). Comparing regional and ethnic conflicts in post-soviet transition states. Regional & Federal Studies, 11(3), pp. 1–35.

Inman, R. & Rubinfeld, D. (1997). Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), pp. 43–64.

Keating, M. (2012). Rethinking territorial autonomy. In A. Gagnon & M. Keating (Ed.) Political autonomy and divided societies: Imagining democratic alternatives in complex settings (pp. 81–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lane, J. & Ersson, S. (2005). The riddle of federalism: Does federalism impact on democracy? Democratization, 12(2), pp. 163–182.

Lustick, I., Miodownik, D. & Eidelson, R. (2004). Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it? American Political Science Review, 98(2), pp. 209–229.

Lynn, A., Kodras, J. & Flint, C. (1997). State devolution in America: Implications for a diverse society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Maxfield, E. (2012). Resistance to change: Romania’s debate over territorial reforms. Sfera Politicii, 20(1), pp. 12–20.

Mozaffar, S. & Scarritt, J. (1999). Why territorial autonomy is not a viable option for managing ethnic conflict in African plural societies. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 5(3– 4), pp. 230–253.

Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. & Castles, F. (2005). Federalism and the welfare state: New World and European experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palermo, F. (2012). Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe and territorial autonomy: Are they really incompatible? In A. Gagnon & M. Keating (Ed.) Political autonomy and divided societies: Imagining democratic alternatives in complex settings (pp. 81–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reilly, B. (2006). Political engineering and party politics in conflict-prone societies. Democratization, 13(5), pp. 811– 827.

Remmer, K. & Wibbels, E. (2000). The subnational politics of economic adjustment – Provincial politics and fiscal performance in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies,33(4), pp. 419–451.

Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, operation, significance. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Riker, W. (1975). Federalism. In F. Greenstein (Ed.) Handbook of Political Science: Governmental Institutions and Processes (pp. 93–172). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Rodden, J. (2005). Hamilton’s paradox: The promise and peril of fiscal federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothchild, D. & Hartzell, C. (1999). Security in deeply divided societies: The role of territorial autonomy. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 5(3–4), pp. 254–271.

Saideman, S. (1997). Explaining the international relations of secessionist conflicts: Vulnerability versus ethnic ties. International Organization, 51(4), pp. 721–753.

Samuels, D. (2003). Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sasse, G. (2001). The ‘New’ Ukraine: A State of Regions. In J. Hughes & G. Sasse. Ethnicity and territory in the former Soviet Union: Regions in conflict (pp. 67–100). London: Frank Cass.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2001). All-Ukrainian Population Census. Retrieved 5 April 2015, from http://ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng.

Suberu, R. (2001). Federalism and ethnic conflict in Nigeria. Washington, DC: Institute of Peace Press.

Tiebout, C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), pp. 416–424.

Treisman, D. (2001). After the deluge: Regional crises and political consolidation in Russia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; Kulesza, M. (2002). Methods and techniques of managing decentralisation reforms in CEE countries: the Polish experience. In G. Peteri (Ed.), Mastering Decentralisation and Public Administration Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe (pp.189–217). Budapest: Open Society Institute.

Volden, C. (2005). Intergovernmental political competition in American federalism. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), pp. 327–342.

Walter, B. (2006). Building reputation: Why governments fight some separatists but not others. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), pp. 313–330.

Watts, R. (1981). Federalism, regionalism, and political integration. In D. Cameron (Ed.) Regionalism and supranationalism (pp. 3–19). Montreal: Institute for Research into Public Policy.

Watts, R. (1998). Federalism, federal political systems, and federations. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, pp. 117–137; Riker, W. & Føllesdal, A. (2007). Federalism. In R. Goodin, P. Pettit & T. Pogge (Ed.) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (pp. 612–620). Oxford: Blackwell.

Weber, M. (1919/1958). Politics as a vocation. In H.H. Gerth & C.W. Mills (trans.) From Max Weber: essays in sociology (pp. 77–128). New York: Galaxy.

Weller, M. & Wolff, S. (2005). Recent trends in autonomy and state construction. In M. Weller & S. Wolff. Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies (pp. 262–270). Abingdon: Routledge.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Partnerzy platformy czasopism