Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2016.019Abstract
Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20762-9References
Annis, D.B„ “A contextualist theory of epistemic justification”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 15 (1978): 213–219.
Baltag, A., L. Moss, and S. Solecki, “The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions”, pages 43–56 in I. Giboa (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK-98), Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
Hakkarainen, K., and M. Sintonen, “The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning”, Science and Education, 11 (2002): 25–43.
Hintikka, J., The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511624919
Hintikka, J., Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9313-7
Hintikka, J., Socratic Epistemology. Exploration of Knowledge-seeking by Questioning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 20007. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619298
Krivine, J.-L., “Realizability in classical logic”, pages 197–229 in Panoramas et Synthèses, 2009.
Lakatos, I., Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316286425
Prawitz, D., “Meaning approached via proofs”, Synthese, 148, 3 (2006): 507–524. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-004-6295-2
Willimas, M., Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
Wiśniewski, A., “Socratic proofs”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33 (2004): 299–326. DOI: 10.1023/B:LOGI.0000031374.60945.6e
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 573
Number of citations: 0
