Meinongian extensions of predicates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2005.011Keywords
Meinong, nonexistent objects, extensions in predicate logicAbstract
The paper analyses the contemporary notion of an extension of a predicate from the perspective of semantics typical for Meinongian logics, and in opposition to the traditional notion of extension. This leads to a discussion of the types of properties that can be predicated about objects as belonging to the sets of properties ascribed to them, and such that can be predicated about them only ‘externally’. It is also problematic in which sense nonexistent objects possess the properties ascribed to them. The concluding remarks concern some issues related to the truth of predications about nonexistent objects, which is the basic condition to admit them as belonging to the extensions of predicates in the first place.References
Cocchiarella, N., “Meinong Reconstructed versus Early Russell Reconstructed”. In: Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy, Ohio State University Press, 1987, pp. 119–151.
Fine, K.,“Critical Review of Parsons’ Nonexistent Objects”, Philosophical Studies 45: 95–142, 1984.
Haack, S., Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Jacquette, D., Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin-New York, 1996.
Lambert, K., Meinong and the Principle of Independence, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Parsons, T., Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, 1980.
Paśniczek, J., The Logic of Intentional Objects. A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.
Zalta, E., Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Massachussets Institute of Technology Press, 1988.
Zalta, E., “On Mally’s Alleged Heresy: A Reply”. Online: http://mally.sta nford.edu/jacquette.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 725
Number of citations: 0
