Can contradictions be asserted?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.1999.014Abstract
In a universal logic containing naive semantics the semantic antinomies will be provable. Although being provable they are not assertible because of some pragmatic constraints on assertion I will argue for. Furthermore, since it is not acceptable that the thesis of dialethism is a dialethia itself, what it would be according to naive semantics and the prefered logical systems of dialethism, a corresponding restriction on proof theory is necessary.References
Blau, U. 1978, Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache. Berlin/New York.
Bloesch, A. 1993, “A tableau style proof system for two paraconsistent logics”, Notre Dame Journal of Symbolic Logic 34, 295–301.
Bremer, M. 1995, “Zwei Doppelaspekttheorien der Wahrheit”, Logos, N.F. [4] Bremer, M. 1998,Wahre Widersprüche. Eine Einführung in die Parakonsistente Logik. Sankt Augustin.
Priest, G. 1979, “The logic of paradox”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 219–241.
Priest, G. 1980, “Sense, entailment and modus ponens”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, 415–435.
Priest, G. 1987, In Contradiction. A Study of the Transconsistent. Dordrecht.
Priest, G. 1995, Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge.
Sainsbury, R. 1988, Paradoxes. Cambridge.
Stalnaker, R. 1968, “A Theory of conditionals”, Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph 2, 98–112.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 565
Number of citations: 0
