Pedestrian accessibility of services as a measure of territorial cohesion at the neighbourhood level

Lukasz Damurski, Jacek Pluta, Wawrzyniec Zipser

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/28607

Abstract


Territorial cohesion, despite its initial ambiguity, has been successfully implemented in national and regional policies across the EU. However, its operationalisation on the local level remains a major challenge. This paper asks whether pedestrian accessibility of services and public transport nodes can be used as a measure of territorial cohesion at the local level. The presented research was conducted in 2016–19 in five neighbourhoods in Poland representing various settlement contexts: large cities, medium-sized towns and suburban areas. It adapted particular indicators of territorial cohesion established by ESPON to the neighbourhood scale. The highest levels of territorial cohesion expressed by users’ satisfaction were achieved in a neighbourhood in a medium-sized town, whereas in geographical terms, territorial cohesion reached higher levels in large cities. Despite those differences, the proposed research method based on pedestrian accessibility offers quantifiable and comparable results on territorial cohesion on the neighbourhood level.


Keywords


territorial cohesion; neighbourhood; accessibility; services; public transport; pedestrians

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bryniarska, Z., Starowicz W. (2010) Wyniki badań systemów publicznego transportu zbiorowego w wybranych miastach, SITK, Kraków.

Christaller, W. (1993) Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland, Gustav Fischer, Jena.

Clifton J., Díaz-Fuentes D. & Fernández-Gutiérrez M. (2016) Public Infrastructure Services in the European Union: Challenges for Territorial Cohesion, Regional Studies Volume 50, Issue 2, 358-373.

Colomb, C., & Santinha, G. (2014) European Union competition policy and the European territorial cohesion agenda: An impossible reconciliation? State Aid rules and public service liberalization through the European spatial planning lens. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 459–480. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.744384

Damurski, Ł., Pluta, J., Maier, K., Andersen, H.T. (2019) Stakeholders in the local service centre: who should be involved in the planning process? Insights from Poland, Czech Republic and Denmark. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 43(43), 91-106. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0006

Dao, H., Cantoreggi, P. & Rousseaux, V. (2017) Operationalizing a contested concept: indicators of territorial cohesion, European Planning Studies, 25:4, 638-660, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1281230

Drevet, J. (2007) Chasing a moving target: territorial cohesion policy in a Europe with uncertain borders. In A. Faludi (ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.

ESPON (2012) INTERCO. Indicators of territorial cohesion. Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/2. Final Report. Part A. Executive summary.

ESPON & University of Geneva, Luxembourg.

European Commission (2004) A new partnership for cohesion convergence competitiveness cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesion. European Communities.

European Union (2002) Consolidated versions of the treaty on European Union and of the treaty establishing the European Community. 2002/C 325/01.

Faludi, A. (2007) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).

Gehl, J. (2009) Życie między budynkami: użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznych. Tłum. M. A. Urbańska. Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków.

Guzik, R. (2003) Przestrzenna dostępność szkolnictwa ponadpodstawowego, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Hägerstrand, T. (1970) What about people in Regional Science. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. XXIV: 7–21.

Korzeniewski, W. (1989) Budownictwo mieszkaniowe. Poradnik projektanta. Arkady, Warszawa.

Litman, T. (2018) Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.

Lovejoy, K., Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P. (2010) Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning Vol. 97, 37–48.

Luukkonen, J. & Moilanen, H. (2012) Territoriality in the Strategies and Practices of the Territorial Cohesion Policy of the European Union: Territorial Challenges in Implementing “Soft Planning”, European Planning Studies, 20:3, 481-500, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651806

Mao, L., Nekorchuk, D. (2013), Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes, Health and Place No 24, 115-122.

Mouratidis, K. (2018) Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, Vol. 55(11), 2408–2430.

Nosek, Š. (2017) Territorial cohesion storylines in 2014–2020 Cohesion Policy, European Planning Studies, 25:12, 2157-2174, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1349079

Ohmer M. L., Coulton C., Freedman D. A., Sobeck J. L., Booth J. (2019) Measures for Community and Neighborhood Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Prażniewski, A. (2009) Spójność terytorialna… Włocławek: Kujawsko-Pomorskie Biuro Planowania Przestrzennego i Regionalnego. Document available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/pdf/2_national/kujawsko_pomorski.pdf (accessed 28.06.2019).

Sá Marques, T., Saraiva, M., Santinha, G., Guerra, P. (2018) Re‐Thinking Territorial Cohesion in the European Planning Context. International Journal Of Urban And Regional Research, 1-26. DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12608

Shearmur, R. (eds.) Knowledge Intensive Business Services: Geography and Innovation, Ashgate, Farnham Surrey and Burlington Vermont.

Van Neste, S. L., Sénécal, G. (2015) Claiming Rights To Mobility Through The Right To Inhabitance: Discursive Articulations from Civic Actors in Montreal. International Journal Of Urban And Regional Research, 218-233. DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12215

Van Well, L. (2012) Conceptualizing the logics of territorial cohesion. European Planning Studies 20.9, 1549–67.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Sullivan, Y. W. (2016) Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 17 Issue 7, 435-494.

Zhang, X., & Mu, L. (2019) The perceived importance and objective measurement of walkability in the built environment rating. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, p. 1-17.








Print ISSN: 1732-4254
Online ISSN: 2083-8298

Partnerzy platformy czasopism