Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Quality in Sport

Review of Robotic-Assisted Surgical Procedures Available in Poland
  • Home
  • /
  • Review of Robotic-Assisted Surgical Procedures Available in Poland
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 35 (2024) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Review of Robotic-Assisted Surgical Procedures Available in Poland

Authors

  • Adrian Suława Lower Silesian Oncology Center Ludwik Hirszfeld Square 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2451-6321
  • Sebastian Fedorowicz Lower Silesian Specialist Hospital - Emergency Medicine Centre ul. Gen. Augusta Emila Fieldorfa 2, 54-049 Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8557-5011
  • Adrianna Madej Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital Osiedle Złotej Jesieni 1, 31-826 Kraków, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1024-8388
  • Oskar Targoński Public University Hospital No. 1 in Lublin Stanisława Staszica 16, 20-400 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8570-0211
  • Marta Targońska Public University Hospital No. 1 in Lublin Stanisława Staszica 16, 20-400 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9701-6021
  • Julia Furgalska Lower Silesian Oncology Center Ludwik Hirszfeld Square 12, 53-413 Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1096-6711
  • Aneta Basiak Beskid Centre of Oncology - John Paul II City Hospital ul. Wyzwolenia 18, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4790-8135
  • Aleksander Ptasiński Public University Hospital No. 1 in Lublin Stanisława Staszica 16, 20-400 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5326-2028
  • Rafał Niekurzak Public University Hospital No. 1 in Lublin Stanisława Staszica 16, 20-400 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3694-0562
  • Agnieszka Buczek Public University Hospital No. 1 in Lublin Stanisława Staszica 16, 20-400 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6717-2630

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2024.35.56240

Keywords

Robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, minimally invasive surgery

Abstract

Introduction and purpose:

Surgical robots are gaining increasing acceptance and utilization in the medical world. This trend is also notable in Poland, where both the prevalence and application of surgical robots have notably risen, establishing them as integral components of patient care. Our study aims to evaluate the current literature on robotic-assisted surgery available in Poland using the PubMed database. We aim to clarify the advantages of this approach over traditional methods and other minimally invasive techniques.

State of knowledge:

In Poland, we have three registered and widely available surgical robotic-assisted procedures intended for the treatment of prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Robotic surgery represents a significant advancement in the surgical treatment of cancers for both patients and surgeons. By enhancing precision and providing a more comfortable and efficient working environment, robotic surgical systems improve patient outcomes and offer substantial advantages to surgical teams.

Summary:

The major benefits of robotic surgery are short-term outcomes including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer postoperative complications. When it comes to long-term outcomes differences are not such significant. What needs to be clarified is the potential advantages over conventional laparoscopic techniques in future studies to define the role of robotic surgery in different cancer treatment algorithms.

References

Is Robotic-Assisted Surgery Better? AMA J Ethics. 2023;25(8):E598-604. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2023.598

Philip Crowe, S. W. Wong. Visualization ergonomics and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(5):1873-1878. doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01618-7

Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2000;214(1):129-140. doi:10.1243/0954411001535309

Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):162-167. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.017

Peter C L, Elizabeth K, Dh Do Hwan P. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008

Regulation of the Minister of Health dated January 25, 2022, amending the regulation on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220000245

Regulation of the Minister of Health dated July 28, 2023, amending the regulation on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20230001477

Surgical robotics market in Poland 2023 and development forecasts for 2024-2028 by Polish Federation of Hospitals & Upper Finance https://upperfinance.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Raport_Rynek_robotyki_2023.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://upperfinance.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Raport_Rynek_robotyki_2023.pdf

Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D, Franco EL, Gotlieb WH. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):717-724. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824c0956

Bell KJL, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(7):1749-1757. doi:10.1002/ijc.29538

Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2015;51(9):1164-1187. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.002

Announcement of the Minister of Health on the announcement of the consolidated text of the regulation of the Minister of Health on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment, dated 13 March 2023. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20230000870/O/D20230870.pdf

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431-452. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi:10.3310/hta16410

Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216-225. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029

Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):382-404. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047

Labban M, Dasgupta P, Song C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(4):e225740. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5740

The Polish National Cancer Registry. Cancer in Poland in 2021. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://onkologia.org.pl/sites/default/files/publications/2024-02/0_krn-2023-book-2024-02-13-pass.pdf

Araujo SEA, Seid VE, Klajner S. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2014;20(39):14359-14370. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14359

Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1034-1046. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523

Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Harper M, Parvaiz A. Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(11):744-754. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.744

Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(11):e522. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000522

Ravendran K, Abiola E, Balagumar K, et al. A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery. Cureus. Published online April 9, 2023. doi:10.7759/cureus.37337

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7-34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660

Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. Body Fatness and Cancer — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794-798. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1606602

Eoh KJ, Kim TJ, Park JY, Kim HS, Paek J, Kim YT. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1219371. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1219371

Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M, et al. Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):160.e1-160.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.871

Saotome K, Yamagami W, Machida H, et al. Impact of lymphadenectomy on the treatment of endometrial cancer using data from the JSOG cancer registry. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021;64(1):80-89. doi:10.5468/ogs.20186

O’Malley DM, Smith B, Fowler JM. The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):761-768. doi:10.1002/jso.23988

Rajiv B G, Rebecca M, Adam S, et al. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

1.
SUŁAWA, Adrian, FEDOROWICZ, Sebastian, MADEJ, Adrianna, TARGOŃSKI, Oskar, TARGOŃSKA, Marta, FURGALSKA, Julia, BASIAK, Aneta, PTASIŃSKI, Aleksander, NIEKURZAK, Rafał and BUCZEK, Agnieszka. Review of Robotic-Assisted Surgical Procedures Available in Poland. Quality in Sport. Online. 18 December 2024. Vol. 35, p. 56240. [Accessed 23 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/QS.2024.35.56240.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 35 (2024)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Adrian Suława, Sebastian Fedorowicz, Adrianna Madej, Oskar Targoński, Marta Targońska, Julia Furgalska, Aneta Basiak, Aleksander Ptasiński, Rafał Niekurzak, Agnieszka Buczek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 107
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, minimally invasive surgery
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop