Review of Robotic-Assisted Surgical Procedures Available in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2024.35.56240Keywords
Robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, minimally invasive surgeryAbstract
Introduction and purpose:
Surgical robots are gaining increasing acceptance and utilization in the medical world. This trend is also notable in Poland, where both the prevalence and application of surgical robots have notably risen, establishing them as integral components of patient care. Our study aims to evaluate the current literature on robotic-assisted surgery available in Poland using the PubMed database. We aim to clarify the advantages of this approach over traditional methods and other minimally invasive techniques.
State of knowledge:
In Poland, we have three registered and widely available surgical robotic-assisted procedures intended for the treatment of prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Robotic surgery represents a significant advancement in the surgical treatment of cancers for both patients and surgeons. By enhancing precision and providing a more comfortable and efficient working environment, robotic surgical systems improve patient outcomes and offer substantial advantages to surgical teams.
Summary:
The major benefits of robotic surgery are short-term outcomes including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer postoperative complications. When it comes to long-term outcomes differences are not such significant. What needs to be clarified is the potential advantages over conventional laparoscopic techniques in future studies to define the role of robotic surgery in different cancer treatment algorithms.
References
Is Robotic-Assisted Surgery Better? AMA J Ethics. 2023;25(8):E598-604. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2023.598
Philip Crowe, S. W. Wong. Visualization ergonomics and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(5):1873-1878. doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01618-7
Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2000;214(1):129-140. doi:10.1243/0954411001535309
Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):162-167. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.017
Peter C L, Elizabeth K, Dh Do Hwan P. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008
Regulation of the Minister of Health dated January 25, 2022, amending the regulation on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220000245
Regulation of the Minister of Health dated July 28, 2023, amending the regulation on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20230001477
Surgical robotics market in Poland 2023 and development forecasts for 2024-2028 by Polish Federation of Hospitals & Upper Finance https://upperfinance.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Raport_Rynek_robotyki_2023.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://upperfinance.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Raport_Rynek_robotyki_2023.pdf
Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D, Franco EL, Gotlieb WH. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):717-724. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824c0956
Bell KJL, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(7):1749-1757. doi:10.1002/ijc.29538
Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2015;51(9):1164-1187. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.002
Announcement of the Minister of Health on the announcement of the consolidated text of the regulation of the Minister of Health on guaranteed benefits in the field of hospital treatment, dated 13 March 2023. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20230000870/O/D20230870.pdf
Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431-452. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi:10.3310/hta16410
Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216-225. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029
Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):382-404. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047
Labban M, Dasgupta P, Song C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(4):e225740. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5740
The Polish National Cancer Registry. Cancer in Poland in 2021. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://onkologia.org.pl/sites/default/files/publications/2024-02/0_krn-2023-book-2024-02-13-pass.pdf
Araujo SEA, Seid VE, Klajner S. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2014;20(39):14359-14370. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14359
Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1034-1046. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523
Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Harper M, Parvaiz A. Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(11):744-754. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.744
Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(11):e522. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000522
Ravendran K, Abiola E, Balagumar K, et al. A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery. Cureus. Published online April 9, 2023. doi:10.7759/cureus.37337
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7-34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. Body Fatness and Cancer — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794-798. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1606602
Eoh KJ, Kim TJ, Park JY, Kim HS, Paek J, Kim YT. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1219371. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1219371
Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M, et al. Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):160.e1-160.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.871
Saotome K, Yamagami W, Machida H, et al. Impact of lymphadenectomy on the treatment of endometrial cancer using data from the JSOG cancer registry. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021;64(1):80-89. doi:10.5468/ogs.20186
O’Malley DM, Smith B, Fowler JM. The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):761-768. doi:10.1002/jso.23988
Rajiv B G, Rebecca M, Adam S, et al. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adrian Suława, Sebastian Fedorowicz, Adrianna Madej, Oskar Targoński, Marta Targońska, Julia Furgalska, Aneta Basiak, Aleksander Ptasiński, Rafał Niekurzak, Agnieszka Buczek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 5
Number of citations: 0