Search

Search Results

• The Logical Burdens of Proof. Assertion and Hypothesis

  Daniele Chiffi, Fabien Schang

  509-530

  2017-04-14
• Does the Implication Elimination Rule Need a Minor Premise?

  Nissim Francez

  351-373

  2017-07-21
• Aristotle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and What Does Not Exist

  Charlene Elsby

  57-72

  2015-08-22
• Admissibility of Ackermann’s rule δ in relevant logics

  Gemma Robles

  411-427

  2013-08-29
• A Routley-Meyer semantics for Ackermann’s logics of “strenge implication”

  José M. Méndez

  191-219

  2010-03-30
• “Lying, poets tell the truth …”. “The logical status of fictional discourse” by John Searle – a still possible solution to an old problem?

  Marzenna Cyzman

  317-326

  2011-12-20
• Simplified Semantics for Further Relevant Logics I Unreduced Semantics for E and Π′

  Tore Fjetland Øgaard

  109-151

  2024-08-27