An Introduction to the Special Issue on Logic, Cognition and Argumentation
Keywordslogic, cognition, argumentation
AbstractIn recent years we have witnessed a cognitive or ‘practical’ turn in logic [Gabbay and Woods, 2005; Urbański, 2011]. The most fundamental claim of its proponents is that logic has much to say about actual reasoning and argumentation. This cognitively-orientated logic. It acquires a new task of “systematically keeping track of changing representations of information” [van Benthem, 2008, p. 73], and, due to all the achievements of the mathematisation of logic, is fully up to this task. It also contests the claim that distinction between a descriptive and a normative account of the analysis of reasoning is disjoint and exhaustive [Gabbay and Woods, 2003, p. 37].
Gabbay, D.M., and J. Woods, 2003, Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Gabbay, D.M., and J. Woods, 2005, ‘The practical turn in logic”, pages 15–122 in D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (2nd ed.), vol. 13, Springer. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3521-7_1
Stenning, K. and M. van Lambalgen, 2008, Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Urbański, M., 2011, “Logic and cognition: The faces of psychologism”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 20, 1–2: 175–185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2011.009
van Benthem, J., 2008, “Logic and reasoning: Do the facts matter?”, Studia Logica 88, 1: 67–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9101-1
How to Cite
Number of views and downloads: 77
Number of citations: 0