Changing one’s position in a discussion — some adaptive approaches
AbstractThis paper contains different approaches to solve the problem how to construct the ultimate position out of one’s interventions in a discussion after possibly one or more position changes. In all approaches it is the aim to come as close as possible to human reasoning. Therefore all logics are adaptive logics. The first logic is an extension of an adaptive translation into S5 of the Rescher-Manor mechanisms. The second one is a dynamic proof theory based on a technique using indices. In the end a satisfactory solution is given by a dynamic proof theory expressing the idea of prioritized compatibility, i.e. compatibility step by step.
Batens, D., ‘A strengthening of the Rescher–Manor consequence relations’. To appear in Logique et Analyse.
Batens, D., ‘A general characterization of adaptive logics’, Logique et Analyse, 173–174–175:45–68. Appeared 2003.
Benferhat, S., D. Dubois, and H. Prade, ‘Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. Part 2: The prioritized case’, in Ewa Or lowska, (ed’), Logic at Work. Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa, pp. 473–511, Physica Verlag (Springer), Heidelberg, New York, 1999.
Meheus, J., ‘An adaptive logic based on Ja´skowski’s D2’. To appear.
Vanackere, G., ‘Minimizing ambiguity and paraconsistency’, Logique et Analyse, 165–166:39–160, 1999.
How to Cite
Number of views and downloads: 258
Number of citations: 0