Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Online First Articles
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • Peer Review Process
    • Logic and Logical Philosophy Committee
    • Open Access Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Logic and Logical Philosophy

Vagueness unlimited: In defence of a pragmatical approach to sorites paradoxes
  • Home
  • /
  • Vagueness unlimited: In defence of a pragmatical approach to sorites paradoxes
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 11-12 (2003) /
  4. Articles

Vagueness unlimited: In defence of a pragmatical approach to sorites paradoxes

Authors

  • Bart Van Kerkhove Brussels University (VUB)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2003.013

Abstract

As far as ‘modern’ logical theories of vagueness are concerned, a main distinction can be drawn between ‘semantical’ ones and ‘pragmatical’ ones. The latter are defended here, because they tend to retake into account important contextual dimensions of the problem abandoned by the former. Their inchoate condition seems not alarming, since they are of surprisingly recent date. This, however, could very well be an accidental explanation. That is, the true reason for it might sooner or later turn out to be bearing exactly on the fundamental human limitations, when it comes to theorizing, that these approaches are urging us to appreciate.

Author Biography

Bart Van Kerkhove, Brussels University (VUB)

Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science (CLWF)

References

Ayda I. Arruda, Elias H. Alves (1979), ‘Some Remarks on the Logic of Vagueness’, Bulletin Section of Logic, Vol. 8, 133–138.

JC Beall, Mark Colyvan (2001), ‘Heaps of Gluts and Hyde-ing the Sorites’, Mind, Vol. 110, 401–408.

Max Black (1949), Language and Philosophy. Studies in Method, Cornell University Press, Ithaca N.Y.

Linda Burns (1991), Vagueness. An Investigation into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/New York.

Murray Code (1995), Myths of Reason. Vagueness, Rationality, and the Lure of Logic, Humanities Press, New Jersey.

Newton da Costa, Ot´avio Bueno, Steven French (1998), ‘The Logic of Pragmatic Truth’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 27, 603–620.

Keith Devlin (1997), Goodbye, Descartes. The End of Logic and the Search for a New Cosmology of the Mind, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Michael Dummett (1975), ‘Wang’s Paradox’, Synthese, Vol. 30, 301–324.

Kit Fine (1975), ‘Vagueness, Truth and Logic’, Synthese, Vol. 30, 265–300.

Lynd Forguson (2001), ‘Oxford and the ‘Epidemic’ of Ordinary Language Philosophy’, The Monist, Vol. 84, 325–345.

Gottlob Frege (1971), ‘Begriffsschrift. A Formula Language, Modeled upon That of Arithmatic, for Pure Thought’, in Jean Van Heijenoort, (ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A Source book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass, 1–82; second print of the 1967 original, this article translated from German by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg.

William J. Gavin (1992), William James and the Reinstatement of the Vague, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

Louis Goble (1998), ‘Re-Evaluating Supervaluations’, Protosociology, Vol. 11, 66–92.

Nicolas D. Goodman (1993), ‘Modernizing the Philosophy of Mathematics’, in Alvin M. White, (ed.), Essays in Humanistic Mathematics, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington D.C., 63-66.

Susan Haack (1978), Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Terry Horgan (1994), ‘Transvaluationism: A Dionysian Approach to Vagueness’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33 Supplement, 97–126.

Terry Horgan (1998), ‘The Transvaluationist Conception of Vagueness’, The Monist, Vol. 81, 313–330.

Terry Horgan (2001), ‘Contextual Semantics and Metaphysical Realism: Truth as Indirect Correspondence’, in Michael P. Lynch, (ed.), The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass./London, 67–95.

Nicholas Humphrey (1992), A History of the Mind. Evolution and Birth of Consciousness, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Dominic Hyde (1995), ‘Review Article: Timothy Williamson, Vagueness’, Mind, Vol. 104, 919–925.

Dominic Hyde (1997), ‘From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts’, Mind, Vol. 106, 641–660.

Hans Kamp (1981), ‘The Paradox of the Heap’, in Uwe M¨onnich, (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht / Boston / London, 225–277.

Rosanna Keefe (2000), Theories of Vagueness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rosanna Keefe, Peter Smith, (eds.) (1996), Vagueness. A Reader, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

Ruth Manor (1997), ‘Only the Bald are Bald’, in George Meggle et al., (eds.), Analyomen 2. Volume 2: Philosophy of Language, Metaphysics, De Gruyter, Hawthorne, 178–184.

Ruth Manor (1997 version), ‘Solving the Heap Paradox without Sacrificing Vagueness’, preprint.

Graham Priest (1991), ‘Sorites and Identity’, Logique et Analyse, Vol. 34, 293–296.

Graham Priest (1998), ‘Fuzzy Identity and Local Validity’, The Monist, Vol. 81, 331–342.

Graham Priest, Richard Routley, Jean Norman, (eds.) (1989), Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent, Philosophia Verlag, München.

Hilary Putnam (1983), ‘Vagueness and Alternative Logic’, Erkenntnis, Vol. 19, 297–314.

Diana Raffman (1994a), ‘Vagueness without Paradox’, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 103, 41–74.

Diana Raffman (1994b), ‘Transvaluationism: Comments on Horgan’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33 Supplement, 127–132.

Diana Raffman (1996), ‘Vagueness and Context-Relativity’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 81, 175–192.

Stephen Read (1995), Thinking about Logic. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Richard Rorty (1991), ‘Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the Reification of Language’, in his Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (50-65).

Mark Sainsbury (1990), ‘Concepts without Boundaries’, Inaugural Lecture, King’s College, London; reprinted in Keefe/Smith [24] (251-264).

Stephen Schiffer (1998), ‘Two Issues of Vagueness’, The Monist, Vol. 81, 193–214.

Stephen Schiffer (2000), ‘Vagueness and Partial Belief’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 10, 220–257.

Roy Sorensen (1988), Blindspots, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Jamie Tappenden (1994), ‘Some Remarks on Vagueness and a Dynamic Conception of Language’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33 Supplement, 193–201.

Michael Tye (1990), ‘Vague Objects’, Mind, Vol. 99, 535–557.

Bart Van Kerkhove (2000), ‘Between Semantics and Pragmatics: In Search of a Logic for Vagueness’, internal report, available in pdf-format at http://www.vub.ac.be/CLWF/BVK.

Achille Varzi (1994), ‘Vagueness, Indiscernability, and Pragmatics: Comments on Burns’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33 Supplement, 49–62.

Achille Varzi (1999), An Essay in Universal Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

Achille Varzi (2000), ‘Supervaluationism and Paraconsistency’, in Diderik Batens et al., (eds.), Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic, Research Studies Press, Baldock, 279–297.

Samuel C. Wheeler (1975), ‘Reference and Vagueness’, Synthese, Vol. 30, 367–379.

Samuel C. Wheeler (1979), ‘On That Which Is Not’, Synthese, Vol. 41, 155–173.

Timothy Williamson (1994), Vagueness, Routledge, London.

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953), Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford; translated from German by G.E.M. Anscombe, both English and German versions have been reprinted several times.

Crispin Wright (1975), ‘On the Coherence of Vague Predicates’, Synthese, Vol. 30, 325–365.

Crispin Wright (1987), ‘Further Reflections on the Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Topics, Vol. 15 (227-290); references are to the abridged version reprinted in [24], 204–250.

Crispin Wright (2001), ‘On Being in a Quandary’, Mind, Vol. 110, 45–98.

Logic and Logical Philosophy

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2003-11-23

How to Cite

1.
VAN KERKHOVE, Bart. Vagueness unlimited: In defence of a pragmatical approach to sorites paradoxes. Logic and Logical Philosophy. Online. 23 November 2003. No. 11-12, pp. 251-276. [Accessed 1 July 2025]. DOI 10.12775/LLP.2003.013.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 11-12 (2003)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 666
Number of citations: 0

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop