Is Stoic logic classical?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.1998.003Abstract
In this paper I would like to argue that Stoic logic is a kind of relevant logic rather than the classical logic. To realize this purpose I will try to keep as close as possible to Stoic calculus as expressed with the help of their arguments.References
Anderson, A.R., N.D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1975.
Łukasiewicz, J., “Z historii logiki zdań”, Przegląd Filozoficzny XXXVII, 1934; also in Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii, PWN, Warszawa 1961; in German: “Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik”, Erkenntnis V, 1935, 2nd issue.
Mates, B., Stoic Logic, University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles 1971.
Sexstus Empirikus, Zarysow pirrońskich księga pierwsza, druga i trzecia, nakładem Polskiej Akademii Umiejętności, Krakow 1931; Sexstus Empiricus: Hyp. Pyrrh., Opera, Vol. 1, Teubner, Leipzig 1912, H. Mutschmann (ed.).
Sekstus Empiryk, “Przeciw logikom”, (Przeciw uczonym, ks VII i VIII), PWN, Warszawa 1970; Sextus Empiricus: Adv. Math., Opera, Vol. 2, Teubner, Leipzig 1914, E. Mutschmann (ed.).
Szabo, M. E. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1969.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 768
Number of citations: 0
