The Dismissal of ‘Substance’ and ‘Being’ in Peirce’s Regenerated Logic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.026Keywords
Charles S. Peirce, logic of relatives, substance, being, processAbstract
After introducing the debate between substance philosophy and process philosophy, and clarifying the relevance of the category of ‘substance’ in Peirce’s thought, the present paper reconstructs the role of ‘substance’ and ‘being’ from Peirce’s early works to his theory of the proposition, provided after his studies on the logic of relatives. If those two categories apparently disappear in Peirce’s writings from the mid-1890s onwards, the account of ‘subject’ and ‘copula’ in Peirce’s analysis of the proposition allows one to grasp the reasons why Peirce omits ‘substance’ and ‘being’ in favor of his three categories (Firstness, Secondness, Thirdness), and to understand why his philosophy cannot be considered as a substance philosophy.
References
Charles S. Peirce works
The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burks (eds.), Harvard University Press, 1931–1935, 1958.
The Essential Peirce, vol. 2, the Peirce Edition Project (ed.), Indiana University Press, 1998.
The Charles S. Peirce Papers, Houghton Library, Harvard University.
Richard Robin’s Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce, University of Massachusetts Press, 1967. RL refers to Peirce’s letters, listed as in the correspondence section of Robin’s Catalogue.
Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898, K. L. Ketner (ed.), Harvard University Press, 1992.
Semiotics and Significs: Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby, C. S. Hardwick (ed.), Indiana University Press, 1977.
Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. 7 vols., E. Moore, C. J. W. Kloesel, et al. (eds.), Indiana University Press, 1982–present.
“The regenerated logic”, The Monist 7 (1): 19–40, 1896.
“The logic of relatives”, The Monist 7 (2): 161–217, 1897.
Selected Writings on Semiotics, 1894–1912, F. Bellucci (ed.), De
Gruyter Mouton, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110607390
References
Atkin, A., “Peirce on the index and indexical reference”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41, 1 (2005): 161–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40358956
Atkins, R. K., Charles S. Peirce’s Phenomenology: Analysis and Consciousness, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Atkins, R. K., “Peirce on facts, propositions, and the index”, Semiotica 228 (2019): 17–28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0082
Bellucci, F.,“Peirce and the unity of the proposition”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50, 2 (2014): 201–219. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/562364
Bellucci, F., “ ‘Logic, considered as semeiotic’: On Peirce’s philosophy of logic”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50, 4 (2014): 523–547. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.4.523
Bellucci, F. (ed.), “Peirce’s theory of the proposition”, special issue of Blityri, IX, 2 (2020). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4454/blityri.v9i2
Brioschi, M. R., Creativity Between Experience and Cosmos: C. S. Peirce and A. N. Whitehead on Novelty, Karl Alber Verlag, 2020.
Brioschi, M. R., “For a new logic of the proposition: Peirce and the concept of ‘rhema’ ”, Blityri IX, 2 (2020): 23–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4454/blityri.v9i2.260
Browning, D. (ed.), Philosophers of Process, Random House, 1965.
Burch, R. W., A Peircean Reduction Thesis: The Foundations of Topological Logic, Texas Tech University Press, 1991.
Buzzelli, D., “The argument of Peirce’s ‘new list of categories’”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 8, 2 (1972): 63–89. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40320362
Chauviré, C., “Logique et grammaire pure. Propositions, sujets et prédicats chez Peirce”, Histoire Épistémologie Langage 16, 1 (1994): 137–175.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/hel.1994.2389
Chauviré, C., “Indexicalité et assertion chez Peirce”, Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de La Ciencia X, 20–21 (2010): 87–101. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41418343003
Colapietro, V. M., Peirce’s Approach to the Self, State University of New York Press, 1989.
Colapietro, V. M., “A tentative formulation of an ontological category”, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 53, 4 (1997): 515—527.
De Tienne, A., L’analytique de la representation chez Peirce: La genèse de la theéorie des Categories, Bruxelles: Faculté úniversitaires Saint-Louis, 1996.
Debrock, G. (ed.), Process Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution, Brill Rodopi, 2003.
Dewey, J., Experience and Nature, George Allen & Unwin, 1929.
Dewey, J., Logic: the Theory of Inquiry, Henry Holt and Company, 1938.
Esposito, J., “Synechism: the keystone of Peirce’s metaphysics”, in M. Bergman and J. Queiroz (eds.), The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition, 2005. http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/esposito-joseph-synechism-keystone-peirce%E2%80%99s-metaphysics
Fabbrichesi, R., “The relevance of the concept of relation in Peirce”, pages 95–102 in G. Debrock and M. Hulswit (eds.), Living Doubt. Essays Concerning the Epistemology of Charles Sanders Peirce, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
Fadda, E., “Peirce e le lingue”, pages 127–36 in M. A. Bonfantini, R. Fabbrichesi and S. Zingale (eds.), Su Peirce, Bompiani, 2015.
Ferriani, M., “Peirce’s analysis of the proposition: Grammatical and logical aspects”, pafes 149–172 in D. Buzzetti and M. Ferriani (eds.), Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language, Benjamins, 1987.
Fisch, M. H., Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism, Indiana University Press, 1986.
Fisch, M. H., Classic American Philosophers: Peirce, James, Royce, Santayana, Dewey and Whitehead, Fordham University Press, 1996 [1951].
Fuhrman, G., “Peirce’s retrospectives on his phenomenological quest”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49, 4 (2013): 490–508. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.49.4.490
Gartenberg, Z. M., “Intelligibility and subjectivity in Peirce: A reading of his ‘new list of categories’˙’’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 50, 4 (2012): 581–610. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2012.0071
Gava, G., “Peirce’s ‘prescision’ as a transcendental method”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19, 2 (2011): 231–253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2011.561614
Haack, S., “Not cynicism, but synechism”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41, 2 (2005): 240–253.
Hartshorne, C., Creativity in American Philosophy, State University of New York Press, 1984.
Hausman, C. R., Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Hilpinen, R., “On Peirce’s philosophical logic: Propositions and their objects”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28, 3 (1992): 467–488. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40320371
James, W., The Meaning of Truth, Longman, Green & co, 1911. [34] Ketner, K. L., and H. Putnam, “Introduction”, pages 1–54 in K. L. Ketner (ed.), Reasoning and the Logic of Things – Charles Sanders Peirce, Harvard University Press, 1992.
Lane, R., Peirce on Realism and Idealism, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Locke , G., “Peirce’s metaphysics: evolution, synechism, and the mathematical conception of the continuum”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36, 1 (2000): 133–147.
Maddalena, G., “Abduction and metaphysical realism”, Semiotica 153: 243–259. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.243
Martin, R. M., Peirce’s Logic of Relations and Other Studies, De Gruyter Mouton, 1980.
Mead, G. H., Mind, Self and Society, C. W. Morris (ed.), University of Chicago Press, 1934.
Merrill, D. D., “De Morgan, Peirce and the logic of relations”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 14, 4: 247–84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319851
Michael, E., “Peirce’s early study of the logic of relations, 1865–1867”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 10, 2 (1974): 63–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319705
Murphey, M., The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy, Harvard University Press, 1961.
Murphey, M., “Peirce, Charles Sanders (1839–1914)”, pages 163–173 in Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition, 1989.
Nöth, W., “Charles Sanders Peirce, pathfinder in linguistics”, Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistic and Semiotic Analysis 7, 1 (2002): 1–14.
Paolucci, C., “Logic of relatives and semiotics in Peirce. From the ‘subjectpredicate’ inferential structure to the synechistic topology of interpretation”, pages 36–58 in V. Gvoždiak and M. Švantner (eds.), How to Make Our Signs Clear, Boston, Brill, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004347786_005
Pape, H., “Peirce’s Process Ontology of Relational Order”, in T. Thellefsen and B. Sørensen (eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words: 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition, 239–244, De Gruyter Mouton, 2014.
Potter, V., “Peirce on ‘substance’ and ‘foundations’˙’’, The Monist 75, 4 (1992): 492–503. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/monist199275429
Ransdell, J., “Peirce est-il un phénoménologue?”, Ètudes Phénoménologiques 9–10 (1989): 51–75.
Reynolds, A., Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics, Vanderbilt University Press, 2002.
Rescher, N., Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
Rosensohn, W. L., The Phenomenology of Charles S. Peirce: From the Doctrine of Categories to Phaneroscopy, Gruüner Publishing Company, 1974.
Rosenthal, S. B., Speculative Pragmatism, The University of Massachusetts Press, 1986.
Short, T. L., “Some problems concerning Peirce’s conceptions of concepts and propositions”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20, 1 (1984): 20–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40320030
Short, T. L., “Questions concerning certain claims made for the ‘new list’ ”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49, 3 (2013): 267–298. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.49.3.267
Sorrell, K., “Peirce and a pragmatic reconception of substance”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37, 2 (2001): 257–295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40320842
Stjernfelt, F., Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns, Docent Press, 2014.
Stjernfelt, F., “Co-localization as the syntax of multimodal propositions: An amazing Peircean idea and some implications for the semiotics of truth”, pages 419–458 in T. Jappy (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics, Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350076143.ch-15
Thibaud, P., “Between saying and doing: Peirce’s propositional space”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33, 2 (1997): 270–327. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40320664
Thompson, M., The Pragmatic Philosophy of C.S. Peirce, The University of Chicago Press, 1953.
Tiercelin, C., “Peirce’s semiotic version of the semantic tradition in formal logic”, pages 187–213 in N. Cooper, P. Engel and H. Wheatsheaf (eds.), New Inquiries into Meaning and Truth, St. Martin Press, 1991.
Whately, R., Elements of Logic, J. Mawman, 1826.
Whitehead, A. N., The Concept of Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1920.
Zalamea, F., Peirce’s Logic of Continuity, Docent Press, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Regina Brioschi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 1707
Number of citations: 0
