Managing Multiple Information Sources for a Questioning Agenda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2024.016Keywords
questions, formal dialogue system, inferential erotetic logic, erotetic search scenarios, problem decomposition, multi-agent environment, agents' rankingsAbstract
In this paper, we consider how an agent may manage a questioning agenda in a situation where multiple information sources are available. We work within the framework of formal dialogue systems with the underpinning of Inferential Erotetic Logic. Firstly, we present the formal dialogue system DL(IEL)mult for managing multi-agent information retrieval. Then, we extend the proposed system so that it is capable of representing group and individual levels for the question decomposition process. We also propose two measures for evaluating information sources: their cooperativeness and success levels; next, we analyse how the choice of agents may influence the way in which a solution for a given problem is reached.
References
Budzyńska, K., M. Kacprzak, A. Sawicka, and O. Yaskorska, Dynamika dialogow w ujeciu formalnym (Dialogue Dynamics: A Formal Approach), IFiS PAN, Warszawa, 2015.
Corkill, D. D., “Blackboard systems”, AI Expert, 6(9): 40–47, 1991.
Doumpos, M., and E. Grigoroudis (eds.), Multicriteria Decision Aid and Artificial Intelligence: Links, Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Genot, E. J., “The game of inquiry: the interrogative approach to inquiry and belief revision theory”, Synthese, 171(2): 271–289, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9639-0
Grobler, A., “Fifth part of the definition of knowledge”, Philosophica, 86: 33–50, 2012.
Harrah, D., “The logic of questions”, pages 1–60 in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Second Edition, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2002.
Jacot, J., E. Genot, and F. Zenker, “From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic”, Journal of Applied Logic, 18: 105–128, 2016.
Kacprzak, M., and K. Budzynska, “Strategies in dialogues: A game-theoretic approach”, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2014, 266: 333, 2014.
Leszczyńska-Jasion, D., “Erotetic search scenarios as families of sequences and erotetic search scenarios as trees: Two different, yet equal accounts”, Research report no 1(1)/2013. Technical report, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, 2013. https://intquestpro.wordpress.com/resources/reports/
Leszczyńska-Jasion, D., and P. Łupkowski, “Erotetic search scenarios and three-valued logic”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 25(1): 51–76, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-015-9233-4
Łupkowski, P., Logic of Questions in the Wild. Inferential Erotetic Logic in Information Seeking Dialogue Modelling, College Publications, London, 2016.
Łupkowski, P., “IEL-based formal dialogue system for tutorials”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 26(3): 287–320, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2017.013
Łupkowski, P., “Let me ask you an easier question – Modifying and rephrasing questions in information seeking dialogues”, pages 99–113 in M. Urbański, T. Skura, and P. Łupkowski (eds.), Reasoning: Games, Cognition, Logic, College Publications, 2020.
Łupkowski, P., and O. Ignaszak, “Inferential Erotetic Logic in modelling of cooperative problem solving involving questions in the QuestGen game”, Organon F, 24(2): 214–244, 2017.
Łupkowski, P., O. Majer, M. Peliš, and M. Urbański, “Epistemic erotetic search scenarios”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 27(3): 301–328, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2018.010
Łupkowski, P., and P. Wietrzycka, “Gamification for question processing research – the QuestGen game”, Homo Ludens, 7(1): 161–171, 2015.
Pardo, P., and L. Godo, “A temporal argumentation approach to cooperative planning using dialogues”, Journal of Logic and Computation, 28(3): 551–580, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv007
Peliš, M., Inferences with Ignorance: Logics of Questions (Inferential Erotetic Logic & Erotetic Epistemic Logic), Acta Universtitatis Carolinae – Philosophica et Historica, Karolinum, Praha, 2016.
Peliš, M., and O. Majer, “Logic of questions from the viewpoint of dynamic epistemic logic”, pages 157–172 in M. Peliš (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2009, College Publications, London, 2010.
Peliš, M., and O. Majer, “Logic of questions and public announcements”, pages 145–157 in N. Bezhanishvili, S. Löbner, K. Schwabe, and L. Spada (eds.), Eighth International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language and Computation 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2011.
Roberts, C., “Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics”, Working Papers in Linguistics-Ohio State University Department of Linguistics, pages 91–136, 1996. Reprinted in Semantics and Pragmatics, 2012.
Shoesmith, D. J., and T. J. Smiley, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511565687
Skura, T., and A. Wiśniewski, “A system for proper multiple-conclusion entailment”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 24(2): 241–253, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2015.001
Švarný, P., O. Majer, and M. Peliš, “Erotetic epistemic logic in private communication protocol”, The Logica Yearbook, pages 223–238, 2013.
Teze, J C., and L. Godo, “An architecture for argumentation-based epistemic planning: A first approach with contextual preferences”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2020.
Urbański, M., “Synthetic tableaux and erotetic search scenarios: Extension and extraction”, Logique et Analyse, 173-174-175: 69–91, 2001.
Urbański, M., and P. Łupkowski, “Erotetic search scenarios: Revealing interrogator’s hidden agenda”, pages 67–74 in P. Łupkowski and M. Purver (eds.), Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Polish Society for Cognitive Science, Poznań, 2010.
Urbański, M., K. Paluszkiewicz, and J. Urbańska, “Deductive reasoning and learning: A cross curricular study”, Research report no 2(4)2014. Technical report, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, 2014. https://intquestpro.wordpress.com/resources/reports/
Urbański, M., K. Paluszkiewicz, and J. Urbańska, “Erotetic problem solving: From real data to formal models. An analysis of solutions to erotetic reasoning test task”, pages 33–46 in F. Paglieri, L. Bonetti, and S. Felletti (eds.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion, College Publications, London, 2016.
Urbański, M., and P. Pietruszewski, “How did you know that, Holmes? Inferential Erotetic Logic in Formal Modelling of Problem-Solving in Criminal Investigations by Sherlock Holmes”, Ruch Filozoficzny, LXXV(2): 75–91, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2019.021
Urquhart, A., “Basic many-valued logic”, pages 249–295 in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 2, Kluwer AP, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0452-6_4
Wiśniewski, A., The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, Kluwer AP, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1995.
Wiśniewski, A., “The logic of questions as a theory of erotetic arguments”, Synthese, 109(1): 1–25, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413820
Wiśniewski, A., “Questions and inferences”, Logique et Analyse, 173–175: 5–43, 2001.
Wiśniewski, A., “Erotetic search scenarios”, Synthese, 134: 389–427, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022983325118
Wiśniewski, A., Essays in Logical Philosophy, LIT Verlag, Berlin–Münster–Wien–Zürich–London, 2013.
Wiśniewski, A., Questions, Inferences, and Scenarios, College Publications, London, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Logic and Logical Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 975
Number of citations: 0
