Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Labor et Educatio

Work-home conflict as a challenge for contemporary working societies
  • Home
  • /
  • Work-home conflict as a challenge for contemporary working societies
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. No. 13 (2025): Labor et Educatio /
  4. Artykuły

Work-home conflict as a challenge for contemporary working societies

Authors

  • Katarzyna NOWOSAD Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-9890

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/LE.2025.005

Keywords

work–home conflict, employees’ work–life balance, work–family enrichment, organisational culture, digitalisation of work, technostress, social policy

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of work–home confl ict as one of the key challenges facing contemporary working societies. Th e aim of the study is to analyse theoretical approaches to the conflict between work and family roles and to present the findings of empirical research on its determinants and consequences. The paper discusses both classical and contemporary concepts, including the model developed by Greenhaus and Beutell, Hobfoll’s Conservation of Resources theory, and Clark’s Border Theory. The article has been expanded to include a comprehensive, multidimensional analysis of secondary data, based on an extensive review of recent Polish and
international literature, with particular emphasis on work–family enrichment theory, the phenomenon of facilitation, the impact of digital transformation (technostress and
telepressure), and structural and legal analyses (including the implementation of the Work–Life Balance Directive). The importance of organisational and cultural factors in shaping work–life balance is also highlighted. Based on a review of Polish and international studies, the paper demonstrates that work–home conflict has a significant impact on psychological well-being, social relationships, and job performance. The article emphasises the need for systemic and organisational measures that support employees’ work–life balance.

References

Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2020). Work–family confl ict and well-being: A decade

in review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(6), 424–438.

https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000264

Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-

analysis of work-family confl ict and various outcomes with a special

emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of

Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/

a0022170

Basińska, B. A., & Wróblewska, M. (2022). Work–life balance strategies and work engagement:

Th e role of organizational climate. Psychologia Pracy (Work Psychology),

35(2), 45–59.

Beck, U. (2002). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Wydawnictwo Naukowe

Scholar.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.

Borkowska, S. (2025). Th e right to disconnect as an instrument for protecting employee

well-being in Poland. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi (Human Resource

Management), 23(1), 12–29.

Budrowska, B., & Duch-Krzystoszek, D. (2024). Th e Work–Life Balance Directive and

the transformation of men’s caregiving roles in Poland. Studia Socjologiczne

(Sociological Studies), 252(1), 89–114.

Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of workplace and family antecedents of

work–family confl ict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009

CBOS. (2023). Th e division of household duties in Polish households. Warsaw: Public

Opinion Research Center (CBOS).

Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human

Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary

review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0149206305279602

Czerw, A. (2020). Psychological capital at work and employee well-being. Wydawnictwo

Naukowe PWN.

Eurofound. (2024). Living and working in Europe: Th e challenge of work-life balance

in a digitized world. Luxembourg: Publications Offi ce of the European

Union.

French, K. A., Dumani, S., Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2017). A meta-analysis

of work–family confl ict and social support. Journal of Management, 44(3),

1264–1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315611413

Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook

of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 143–162). American Psychological

Association.

Głogosz, D., & Potocka, A. (2021). Work fl exibility and the psychosocial health of

public sector employees. Medycyna Pracy (Occupational Medicine), 72(4),

381–395.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of confl ict between work and family

roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.

org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352

Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of

work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625

Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface.

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126. https://doi.

org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111

Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Anger, W. K., Bodner, T., & Zimmerman, K. L. (2011).

Clarifying work-family intervention processes: Th e role of family-supportive

supervisor behaviors and achieving cross-level outcomes. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 96(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021163

Hammer, L. B., Brady, J. M., & Perry, M. L. (2023). Th e clinical and physiological consequences

of work-family confl ict: Chronic stress and health outcomes. Occupational

Health Science, 7(2), 201–224.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.

American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-

066X.44.3.513

Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (2022). Work-family confl ict, policies, and turnover intent:

A longitudinal study of contemporary organizations. Human Resource

Management Review, 32(4), 100–118.

Kowalska-Janas, A. (2025). Th e phenomenon of workplace telepressure in the remote

work environment in Poland. E-mentor, 108(1), 34–45.

Lipińska-Grobelny, A. (2014). Work–family confl ict and its consequences. Wydawnictwo

Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Miciuła, I. (2022). Remote work and work–life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Przegląd Organizacji (Organization Review), 3, 25–34.

Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents

of work-family confl ict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational

Behavior, 32(5), 689–725.

Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation

of work-family confl ict and family-work confl ict scales. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 81(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400

Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2020). Cross-national work-life research: Cultural

and institutional contexts. Human Resource Management Review,

30(3), 100–119.

Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Th eory of Modernity. Columbia University

Press.

Shaholli, D., et al. (2024). Remote work and psychological well-being: Th e mediating

role of self-regulation. International Journal of Workplace Health Management,

17(1), 1–15.

Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: Th e stressor-detachment

model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior,

36(S1), S72–S103.

Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work-family facilitation:

A theoretical explanation and model of positive synergy. Human

Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63–76.

Xiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., & Roll, S. (2021). Impacts of working from home

during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Occupational and Environmental

Medicine, 63(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097

Labor et Educatio

Downloads

  • Work-home conflict as a challenge for contemporary working societies

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
NOWOSAD, Katarzyna. Work-home conflict as a challenge for contemporary working societies. Labor et Educatio. Online. 30 June 2026. No. 13, p. 71–85. [Accessed 8 October 2026]. DOI 10.12775/LE.2025.005.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

No. 13 (2025): Labor et Educatio

Section

Artykuły

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons CC BY ND

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 92
Number of citations: 0

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop