Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • For Reviewers
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Journal of Positive Management

COTRANS model of knowledge transfer based on the design thinking method in inter-organizational relationships
  • Home
  • /
  • COTRANS model of knowledge transfer based on the design thinking method in inter-organizational relationships
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019) /
  4. Articles

COTRANS model of knowledge transfer based on the design thinking method in inter-organizational relationships

Authors

  • Anna Dziadkiewicz University of Gdansk Faculty of Management
  • Nelson Jorge Ribeiro Duarte School of Management and Technology - Polytechnic of Porto CIICESI
  • Joanna Nieżurawska-Zając Management Institute, Faculty of Finance and Management, WSB University in Toruń
  • Lech Nieżurawski Management Institute Faculty of Finance and Management, WSB University in Toruń

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2019.013

Keywords

knowledge transfer, model of knowledge transfer, inter-organizational relationships, design thinking method

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the paper is to present a model of knowledge transfer based on a design thinking method.

Design/Methodology/approach. The structured interview method is used in the paper as well as a comparative analysis method. COTRANS model of knowledge transfer based on the design thinking method was created.

Findings. Based on the findings of the empirical study, three propositions are formulated. The first proposition is that the CONTRANS model is a good example of knowledge management. The next one shows DT method as an effective approach in creating a model of knowledge. Last one states that Scholars have argued that both academia and business are motivated to build relationships with one another.

Research limitations/implications. Authors are aware of research limitations which are caused by the methodology of convenient sample selection. The method does not guarantee a representative sample; however, it may become a premise for getting know the population.

Originality/value. The Originality section of the paper displays a potential model presentation with a list of recommendations on how to efficiently transfer knowledge between academia and business, which was one of the main goals of the international COTRANS project.

Additionally, design thinking method was used in order to create the model of knowledge transfer in inter-organizational relationships.

Paper type. Research Paper.

Author Biography

Anna Dziadkiewicz, University of Gdansk Faculty of Management

Assisstant Professor, 

Marketing Department

References

Acha, Virginia L. 2010. “Open by Design: The Role of Design in Open Innovation”. Working paper, DIUS Research Report, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, Department for Innovation, Universities & Skills, London, 8 October.

Agostini, Lara and Nosella, Anna. 2015. “Inter-Organizational Relationships in Marketing: A Critical Review and Research Agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (2): 131-150.

Alavi, Maryam. 2000. “Managing organizational knowledge”, in Zmud, R.W. (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future … from the past, Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio: 15-28.

Alavi, Maryam and Leidner, Dorothy. 2001. “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, Management Information Systems Quarterly 25(1): 107-136.

Albino, Vito, Garavelli, Claudio A. and Schiuma, Giovanni. 1998. “Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: the role of the leader firm”, Technovation 19(1): pp. 53–63.

Ambrose, Gavin and Harris, Paul. 2010. “Design Thinking”, Basic Design Series nº 08, AVA Publishing’s Academia. Singapore.

Bojica, Ana M., Estrada, Isabel, and Fuentes‐Fuentes, Mar M. 2016. “In Good Company: When Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises Acquire Multiplex Knowledge from Key Commercial Partners”, Journal of Small Business Management 56(2): 294-311.

Bouncken, Ricarda B., Pesch, Robin, and Reuschl, Andreas J. 2016. “Copoiesis: Mutual knowledge creation in alliances”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 1(1): 44-50.

Buchanan, Richard. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking”, Design Issues 8(2): 5-21.

Burg, Elco van, Berends, Hans, and Raaij, Erik van. 2014. “Framing and interorganizational knowledge transfer: A process study of collaborative innovation in the aircraft industry”, Journal of Management Studies 51(3): 349-378.

Cerejo, Joana and Barbosa, Alvaro. 2012. “The application of design thinking methodology on research practices: a mind-map of tools and method” in Media on Design Thinking in Education, Media, and Society, proceedings of the 62nd Annual Conference of the International Council for Education in Nicosia, Cyprus, 26-29, September 2012.

Dryl, Wioleta, Dryl, Tomasz, Duarte Nelson J. R., Dziadkiewicz, Anna, Nieżurawska, Joanna, Nieżurawski, Lech, Lopes, Tiago F. F., Pereira, Carla S. G. and Vitor, Santos R. 2015. “Knowledge Transfer in Network Organization. An example of the Polish-Portuguese Network of Researchers (preliminary phase)”, Torun Business Review 14(1): 37- 46.

Dryl, Wioleta, Dryl, Tomasz, Duarte Nelson J. R., Dziadkiewicz, Anna, Nieżurawska, Joanna, Nieżurawski, Lech, Lopes, Tiago F. F., Pereira, Carla S. G. and Vitor, Santos R. 2017. “Knowledge Transfer In Poland And Portugal (CLOSING Phase) - Summary Of Cotrans Project” – Torun Business Review 16(1): 49-61.

He, Quile, Gallear, David, Ghobadian, Abby. 2011. “Knowledge Transfer: The Facilitating Attributes in Supply-Chain Partnerships”, Information Systems Management 28(1): 57-70.

HMSO, (2003), Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report, HMSO, London.

Khamseh, Hamid M., and Jolly, Dominique. 2014. “Knowledge transfer in alliances: the moderating role of the alliance type”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice 12(4): 409-420.

Kolko, Jon. 2011. Exposing the Magic of Design, A Practitioner's Guide to the Methods and Theory of Synthesis, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.

Levina, Natalia and Vaast, Emmanuelle. 2005. “The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems”, Management Information Systems Quarterly 29(2): 335-363.

Lockwood, Thomas. 2009. “Transition: How to Become a More Design-Minded Organization”, Design Management Review 20(3): 27-37.

Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., El Sawy, O.A. (2005), “Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled mark and knowledge creation”, Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 145-187.

Malhotra, Arvind, Gosain, Sanjay, El Sawy, Omar A. 2007. “Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships”, Information Systems Research 18(3): 260-279.

Martin, Roger. 2009. The Design of Business. Why Design Thinking is the next competitive advantage, Harvard Business Press, Boston.

Massaro, M., Moro, A., Aschauer, E., and Fink, M. (2017), “Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks”, Review of Managerial Science: 1-35.

Meier, Matthias 2011. “Knowledge management in strategic alliances: a review of empirical evidence”, International Journal of Management Reviews 13(1): 1-23.

Mesquita, Luiz F., Anand, Jaideep, Brush, Thomas H. 2008. “Comparing the resource-based and relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances”, Strategic Management Journal 29(9): 913-941.

Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, Albino, Vito, Carbonara, Nunzia. 2009. “External knowledge sources and proximity”, Journal of Knowledge Management 13(5): 301-318.

Min-Antorini, Yun, Muniz, Albert M., Askildsen, Tormod. 2012. “Collaborating With Customer Communities: Lessons From the Lego Group. (cover story)”, MIT Sloan Management Review 53(3): 73-79.

Moyano-Fuentes, Jose, Sacristán-Díaz, Macarena, Martínez-Jurado, Pedro J. 2012. “Cooperation in the supply chain and lean production adoption. Evidence from the Spanish automotive industry”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 32(9): 1075-1096.

Natalicchio, Angelo, Ardito, Lorenzo, Savino, Tommaso, and Albino, Vito. 2017. “Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: A systematic literature review”, Journal of Knowledge Management 21(6): 1362-1383.

Pittaway, Luke, Robertson, Maxine, Munir, Kamal, Denyer, David, Neely, Andy. 2004. “Networking and innovation: a systematic review of evidence”, International Journal of Management Reviews 5/6 (3-4):137-168.

Sarala, Riikka and Vaara, Eero. 2010. “Cultural differences, cultural convergence and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies 41(8): 1365- 1390.

Schultze Ulrike, Leidner Dorothy E. 2002. “Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: discourses and theoretical assumptions”, Management Information Systems Quarterly 26(3): 213-242.

Sobrero, Maurizio, Roberts, Edward B. 2001. “The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development”, Management Science 47(4): 493-511.

Spender, John-Christopher, Grant, Robert M. 1996. “Knowledge and the Firm: Overview, Strategic Management Journal 17: 5-9.

Spender, John-Christopher. 2006. “Getting value from knowledge management”, The TQM Magazine 18(3): 238-254.

Zander, Udo, Kogut, Bruce. 1995. “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test”, Organization Science 6(1): 76–92.

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

1.
DZIADKIEWICZ, Anna, DUARTE, Nelson Jorge Ribeiro, NIEŻURAWSKA-ZAJĄC, Joanna and NIEŻURAWSKI, Lech. COTRANS model of knowledge transfer based on the design thinking method in inter-organizational relationships. Journal of Positive Management. Online. 15 June 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 60-74. [Accessed 16 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/JPM.2019.013.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.

Plagiarism and ghostwriting

In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:

1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.

2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).

3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.

4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 761
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

knowledge transfer, model of knowledge transfer, inter-organizational relationships, design thinking method
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop