POSITIVE MANAGEMENT: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL COMMITMENT
Keywordspositive management, psychological contract, employee engagement, organisational commitment
Purpose: To analyse the connection between the psychological contract, employee engagement and organisational commitment in the context of positive management and to create a theoretical background for future research.
Methodology/approach: A qualitative narrative literature review.
Implications for society/further research: The relationship between the psychological contract, employee engagement and organisational commitment forms an important base for further research. The concepts are linked to positive management, which makes it even a more interesting field to study.
Value of the paper (originality paper): The psychological contract, employee engagement and commitment are frequently researched, independently of each other. But the focus of this paper is to research the relation between the concepts. In particular, the attention is asked for the relationship between the psychological contract and employee engagement. To retain engaged employees in organisations research of organisational commitment is required.
Limitations of the paper: The research is a qualitative literature review. Studies in different contexts are compared. The relationship between the psychological contract and employee engagement has not been extensively studied, as shown by the current literature. It is advisable to carry out a quantitative literature review in the future if sufficient studies are carried out in this area.
Allen, N. J., Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of occupational psychology, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 1-18. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Bakker, A. B. (2009), “Een overzicht van tien jaar onderzoek naar bevlogenheid”, Gedrag en Organisatie, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 336-353.
Bakker, A. B. (2011), “An evidence-based model of work engagement”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 265-269. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T., De Jong, S. B. (2013), “How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 545-572. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12028
Cameron, K., Dutton, J. (2003), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, United states: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Caeron, K. (2012), Positive Leadership: strategies for extraordinary performance, United States: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Chmbel, M. J., Oliveira-Cruz, F. (2010), “Breach of psychological contract and the development of burnout and engagement: A longitudinal study among soldiers on a peacekeeping mission”, Military Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 110-127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995601003638934
Coway, N., Briner, R. (2005), Understanding psychological contracts at work, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cyper, N., De Witte, H. (2006), “The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well being and behavioural reports: a psychological contract perspective”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 395-409. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317905X53660
Effectory, (2014), De kracht van feedback. Innoveren doe je samen met medewerkers, avalilable at: http://www.effectory.nl (accessed 01 May 2015).
Gallup, (2014), State of the global workplace. Employee engagement insights for business leaders worldwide, available at: http://www.gallup.com (accessed 01 May 2015).
Gouldner, A. (1960), “The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 161-178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., Gaertner, S. (2000), “A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium”, Journal of management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 463-488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Guest, D. (1998), “Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 649-664. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(1998)19:1+%3C649::AID-JOB970%3E3.0.CO;2-T
Guthrie, J. P. (2001), “High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from New-Zealand”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 180-190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069345
Iverson, R. D., Buttigieg, D. M. (1999), “Affective, normative and continuance commitment: can the ‘right kind’of commitment be managed?, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 307-333. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00138
Meurs, D. N. D. (2013), Organisatiesolidariteit vanzelfsprekend? Solidariteit in organisaties door de lens van het psychologisch contract, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Meurs, D. N. D., Koster, F., Nispen tot Pannerden (2014), “Expectations and Performance”, Journal of Positive Management, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 50-68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2014.023
Parzefall, M. R., Hakanen, J. (2010), “Psychological contract and its motivational and health- enhancing properties”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 4-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941011013849
Robbins, S. J., Judge, T. A. (2011), Organizational Behavior, Pearson Education Limited, Essex, United Kingdom.
Rousseau, D. M. (1989), “Psychological and implied contracts in organizations”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 121-139.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942
Rousseau, D. M. (2000), Psychological contract inventory technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Rousseau, D. M. (2005), I-deals: ideosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves, New York: M. E. Sharpe, New York.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. (2003), The Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES): Test manual, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. (2004), “Bevlogenheid: Een begrip gemeten”, Gedrag en Organisatie, Vol. 17, pp. 89-112.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., Van Rhenen, W. (2009), “How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 893-917. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ job.595
Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., Demerouti, E. (2010), “Not all days are equal: The concept of SWE”, in: Leiter, M. P., Bakker, A. B. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, New York: Psychology Press, New York, pp. 25-30.
Ten Brink, B. E. H. (2004), Psychological Contract: A useful concept?, Print Partners, Enschede.
Van Elst, D. (2014), De relatie tussen leiderschap, doeloriëntatie en bevlogenheid (Masterthesis), Psychologie, Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam.
Wood, J. V. (1996), “What is social comparison and how should we study it?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 520-537. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225009
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B. (2009), “Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources”, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 183-200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285633
Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., Bravo, J. (2007), “The impact of psychological contract breach on work related outcomes: a meta analysis”, Personnel psychology, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 647-680. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x
How to Cite
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
Plagiarism and ghostwriting
In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:
1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.
2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).
3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.
4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).
Number of views and downloads: 690
Number of citations: 0