The “Network Effect” in Management: Social Network Analysis (SNA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2025.003Abstract
Purpose: This article delves into the nature of horizontality in management, delineating both its qualitative and quantitative features. It is the first attempt to determine the preconditions for achieving the network effects, i.e., the impact generated by the connectivity between network participants.
Design/methodology/approach: The theoretical part is based on literature review. The research method is social network analysis (SNA), showing the properties of the entire network, as well as the features of all individual participants’ positions. SNA demonstrates sociograms and their diverse visualizations.
Findings: The study demonstrated 683 connections between the 77 nodes, each of them on average establishing 8.87 connections with others. The density of the entire network is 11.7%, and the average path length is 1.95.
290 cooperation lines were identified, meaning that 290 peer-to-peer projects have been initiated. Each node has established, on average, 3.77 cooperative connections.
Social implications: Horizontal social networks, through providing satisfaction and support (Hirsch 1979), are an important value-added for both business as well as social organizations. The SNA method provides tangible ways to determine key properties of productive networks.
Limitations: The study is based on one social network.It would be valuable to include in future studies also other social network.
Originality/value: This article addresses an original and underexplored topic — the operationalisation of the network effect in the management of social organisations. The proposal to identify structural thresholds as interpretive hypotheses constitutes a novel contribution to the literature.
Keywords: Social networks, SNA, connectivity, cooperation, peer-to-peer communication, horizontality.
Paper type: Research paper.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ryszard Praszkier

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
Plagiarism and ghostwriting
In response to the issue of plagiarism and ghostwriting the editors of the Journal of Positive Management has introduced the following rules to counteract these phenomena:
1. Contributors should be aware of their responsibility for a content of manuscripts.
2. Collective authors are obliged to reveal the contribution and an affiliation of each author (i.e. who is an author of specified part of a paper).
3. Any act of dishonesty will be denounced, the editors will inform appropriate institutions about the situation and give evidence of all cases of misconduct and unethical behaviour.
4. The editors may ask contributors for financial disclosure (i.e. contribution of specified institutions).
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 135
Number of citations: 0