Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

An assessment of the performance of different districts towards Sustainable Development targets in India
  • Home
  • /
  • An assessment of the performance of different districts towards Sustainable Development targets in India
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 32 No. 1 (2021) /
  4. Articles

An assessment of the performance of different districts towards Sustainable Development targets in India

Authors

  • Priyanka Tiwari Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067
  • Mayank Krishna School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.002

Keywords

districts of India, economic index, social index, environment, Sustainable Development Goals, indicators

Abstract

Sustainable development goals encapsulates 17 broad-based goals and 169 associated targets to reconcile among the three pillars of sustainability i.e. social, economic and environmental. In the present study, we sought to understand the performance of 641 districts ofIndiaon social, economic and environmental parameters and on the composite sustainability index as a whole. Our results suggest that there is a large regional variations in performance with districts of southern and western states outperforming northern and eastern states on sustainability index. There is a strong congruence between social and economic indicators. However, environment is still missing from the policy planning. Our results may provide a benchmark and help in micro-level planning at district level and may help in raising public and policy support, realignment and reorientation of the existing policy from the perspective of SDGs.

References

Bai X., McAllister R.R.J., Beaty R.M. & Taylor B., 2010, Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 129-135. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.008

Bandura R., 2008, A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies (UNDP/ODS Working Paper), New York.

Bevir M. & Rhodes R.A.W., 2006, Governance stories. Routledge, London, UK.

Biggs H., Ferreira S., Freitag-Ronaldson S. & Grant-Biggs R., 2011, Taking stock after a decade: does the ‘thresholds of potential concern’ concept need a socio-ecological revamp? Koedoe 53:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1002

Biggs H.C. & Rogers K.H., 2003, An adaptive system to link science, monitoring, and management in practice, [in:] J.T. Du Toit, K.H. Rogers, H.C. Biggs (eds) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 59-80.

Bossel H., 1999, Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Buffoli M., Capolongo S., Bottero M., Cavagliato E., Speranza S. & Volpatti L., 2013, Sustainable Healthcare: how to assess and improve healthcare structures’ sustainability. Annali di igiene 25(5): 411-418. doi: 10.7416/ai.2013.1942

Canadell J.G., Le Quéré C., Raupach M.R., Field C.B., Buitenhuis E.T., Ciais P., ... & Marland G., 2007, Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(47): 18866-18870.

Census of India, 2011, Government of India. http://censusindia.gov.in/

Dahl A.L., 2012,. Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators 17: 14-19.

De J.R., 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. Reproduction, 351(10.1007).

Ekins P., 1997, The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence. Environment and Planning A 29(5): 805-830.

FSI, 2015, India State of Forest Report 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Dehradun.

Glaser G., 2012, Base sustainable development goals on science. Nature 491(7422): 35-35.

Goldin I. & Reinert K.A., 2010, Ideas, development, and globalization. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 29(3-4): 329-348.

Hák T., Janoušková S. & Moldan B., 2016, Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators 60: 565-573.

Harris J.M., 2000, Basic principles of sustainable development, [in:] R. Seidler, K.S. Bawa, (eds), Dimensions of Sustainable Development. Tuft University, Medford, MA, USA, pp. 21-41.

Jiménez-Aceituno A., Peterson G.D., Norström A.V., Wong G.Y., & Downing A.S., 2020, Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa. Sustainability Science 15: 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0

Kates R.W., Parris T.M. & Leiserowitz A.A., 2005, What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment (Washington DC) 47(3): 8-21.

Kwatra S., Kumar A., Sharma P., Sharma S. & Singhal S., 2016, Benchmarking sustainability using indicators: An Indian case study. Ecological Indicators 61: 928-940.

Lafferty W.M. & Meadowcroft J., 2000, Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. doi: 1093/0199242011.003.0001

Laszlo C., 2003, The sustainable company: How to create lasting value through social and environmental performance. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Le Blanc D., 2015, Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development 23: 176–187.

Lélé S.M., 1991, Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development 19(6): 607-621.

Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J. & Behrens W.W., III, 1972, The Limits to Growth: A eport for The Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. A Potomac Associated Book, Universe Books, New York.

Mebratu D., 1998, Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18(6): 493-520.

Pissourios I.A., 2013, An interdisciplinary study on indicators: A comparative review of quality-of-life, macroeconomic, environmental, welfare and sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators 34: 420-427.

Sellberg M.M., Wilkinson C. & Peterson G.D., 2015, Resilience assessment: a useful approach to navigate urban sustainability challenges. Ecology and Society 20(1): 43.

Sneddon C., Howarth R.B. & Norgaard R.B., 2006, Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics 57(2): 253-268.

Stern D.I., 2004, The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32(8): 1419-1439.

Taylor J., 2002, Sustainable development: A dubious solution in search of a problem. Cato Policy Analysis Series, No. 449. The Cato Institute, Washington, DC.

WCED, 1987, World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Walker B. & Salt D., 2006, Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Wilkinson C., 2012a, Urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Planning Theory and Practice 13(2): 319-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124

Wilkinson C., 2012b, Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory 11(2): 148-169. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274

WRIS, Water Resources Information System. Government of India. http://www.india-wris.nrsc.gov.in

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2020-08-13

How to Cite

1.
TIWARI, Priyanka and KRISHNA, Mayank. An assessment of the performance of different districts towards Sustainable Development targets in India. Ecological Questions. Online. 13 August 2020. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-24. [Accessed 25 September 2023]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2021.002.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 391
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

districts of India, economic index, social index, environment, Sustainable Development Goals, indicators
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop