Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

From neural networks to deep learning: Tracing the AI evolution in plant ecology
  • Home
  • /
  • From neural networks to deep learning: Tracing the AI evolution in plant ecology
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming /
  4. Articles

From neural networks to deep learning: Tracing the AI evolution in plant ecology

Authors

  • Akkacha Mehalhal PhD Candidate https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4672-289X
  • Mustapha Ainad Tabet https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0864-1186

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2026.022

Keywords

bibliometrics, science mapping, species distribution modeling, random forests, precision agriculture

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with plant ecology provides a powerful supplementary toolkit for analyzing complex environmental data, yet the structure of this rapidly growing field remains unmapped. This study employs a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 1055 Scopus documents (1968-2025) to chart its conceptual, intellectual, and social landscape. Our analysis reveals a distinct three-phase evolution from foundational Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to a broad machine learning expansion, and a current surge in deep learning for applications like precision agriculture. The field’s conceptual core is built on predictive modeling, particularly for species distribution, and advanced image analytics. We highlight that this evolution has been largely driven by the increasing availability of open-source programming libraries (e.g., in R and Python) and accessible software platforms, rather than just the theoretical advancement of AI itself. The global collaboration network is multi-polar, with the USA and China acting as prominent hubs. This research maps the trajectory of AI applications in ecology and emphasizes the emerging frontier of Explainable AI (XAI), which is essential for moving beyond "black-box" predictions toward interpretable ecological insights and fundamental scientific discovery

References

Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

Austin, M. P. (2007). Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling, 200(1-2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005

Bartold, M., & Kluczek, M. (2023). A Machine Learning Approach for Mapping Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Inland Wetlands. Remote Sensing, 15(9), 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092392

Bartold, M., Wróblewski, K., Kluczek, M., & Dąbrowska-Zielińska, K. (2024). Mapping management intensity types in grasslands with synergistic use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite images. Scientific Reports, 14, 32066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83699-4

Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective?. Ecology and Society, 11(2), r2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01808-1102r02

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787

Christin, S., Hervet, E., & Lecomte, N. (2019). Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(10), 1632–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13256

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. The University of Chicago Press.

Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695. https://igraph.org

Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C. Jr., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007). Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88(11), 2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R. J., Huettmann, F., Leathwick, J. R., Lehmann, A., Li, J., Lohmann, L. G., Loiselle, B. A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J. M., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, S. J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R. E., Soberón, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M. S., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x

Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159

Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x

Fielding, A. H., & Bell, J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088

Franklin, J. (2010). Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press.

Grace, J. B., Anderson, T. M., Olff, H., & Scheiner, S. M. (2010). On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecological Monographs, 80(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0464.1

Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135(2-3), 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9

Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M. B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., & Sykes, M. T. (2006). Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography, 30(6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071957

Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (Eds.). (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Fourth_Paradigm.pdf

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0252-9

IPBES (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Jones, M. B., Schildhauer, M. P., Reichman, O. J., & Bowers, S. (2006). The new bioinformatics: integrating ecological data from the gene to the biosphere. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110031

Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and challenges. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415

Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016

Kattenborn, T., Leitloff, F., Schiefer, F., & Hinz, S. (2021). Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 173, 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010

King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a

Lamba, A., Cassey, P., Segaran, R. R., & Koh, L. P. (2019). Deep learning for environmental conservation. Current Biology, 29(19), R977–R982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.016

Langley, P. (1996). Elements of machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lek, S., Delacoste, M., Baran, P., Dimopoulos, I., Lauga, J., & Aulagnier, S. (1996). Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 90(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00142-5

Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447

Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3), 18–22.

Marmion, M., Parviainen, M., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K., & Thuiller, W. (2009). Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 15(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x

Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., & Mitchell, T. M. (Eds.). (1983). Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Tioga Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5

Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016). Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01419

Molnar, C. (2020). Interpretable machine learning: A guide for making black box models explainable. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/

Narin, F., Stevens, K. S., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093973

Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl 1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100

Norberg, A., Abrego, N., Blanchet, F. G., Adler, F. R., Anderson, B. J., Anttila, J., Araújo, M. B., Dallas, T., Dunson, D., Elith, J., Foster, S. D., Fox, R., Franklin, J., Godsoe, W., Guisan, A., O'Hara, B., Hill, N. A., Holt, R. D., Hui, F. K. C., Husby, M., Kålås, J. A., Lehikoinen, A., Luoto, M., Mod, H. K., Newell, G., Renner, I., Roslin, T., Soininen, J., Thuiller, W., Vanhatalo, J., Warton, D., White, M., Zimmermann, N. E., Gravel, D., & Ovaskainen, O. (2019). A comprehensive evaluation of predictive performance of 33 species distribution models at species and community levels. Ecological Monographs, 89(3), e01370. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1370

Olden, J. D., & Jackson, D. A. (2002). Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecological Modelling, 154(1-2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00064-9

Olden, J. D., Lawler, J. J., & Poff, N. L. (2008). Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 83(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1086/587826

Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190(3-4), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Prasad, A. M., Iverson, L. R., & Liaw, A. (2006). Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Recknagel, F. (2001). Applications of machine learning to ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling, 146(1-3), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00316-7

Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

Roscher, R., Bohn, B., Duarte, M. F., & Garcke, J. (2020). Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveries. IEEE Access, 8, 44963–44985. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976199

Royal Society (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. The Royal Society.

Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A. K., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 21(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015

Sladojevic, S., Arsenovic, M., Anderla, A., Culibrk, D., & Stefanovic, D. (2016). Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016, 3289801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3289801

Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A. L., Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-25

Thessen, A. E. (2016). Adoption of machine learning techniques in ecology and earth science. One Ecosystem, 1, e8622. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.1.e8621

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808

Valavi, R., Elith, J., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., & Guillera-Arroita, G. (2021). Modelling species presence-only data with random forests. Ecography, 44(12), 1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05615

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Weinstein, B. G., Marconi, S., Bohlman, S., Zare, A., & White, E. (2019). Individual tree-crown detection in RGB imagery using semi-supervised deep learning neural networks. Remote Sensing, 11(11), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111309

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org

Wulder, M. A., Masek, J. G., Cohen, W. B., Loveland, T. R., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.010

Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006

Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G. S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017). Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(4), 8–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307

Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20256

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2026-04-20

How to Cite

1.
MEHALHAL, Akkacha and AINAD TABET, Mustapha. From neural networks to deep learning: Tracing the AI evolution in plant ecology. Ecological Questions. Online. 20 April 2026. Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1-26. [Accessed 20 April 2026]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2026.022.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Akkacha Mehalhal, Mustapha Ainad Tabet

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 6
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

bibliometrics, science mapping, species distribution modeling, random forests, precision agriculture
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop