Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

Mapping of ecosystem services provided by deadwood islands in managed forests: An application in the Italian Alps
  • Home
  • /
  • Mapping of ecosystem services provided by deadwood islands in managed forests: An application in the Italian Alps
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Forthcoming /
  4. Articles

Mapping of ecosystem services provided by deadwood islands in managed forests: An application in the Italian Alps

Authors

  • Alessandro Paletto Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-3723
  • Carlotta Sergiacomi Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-4168

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2026.007

Keywords

production forests, biodiversity conservation, stand stability, outdoor recreation, geospatial analysis

Abstract

Over the past few decades, both scientific community and policy makers focused on ecosystem services provided by forests due to their positive impact on human well-being and quality of life. In literature, there is a broad consensus that assessing and mapping ecosystem services is one of the most demanding challenges to address, but at the same time a key tool for effective forest management. This study aims to develop a method suitable to assess and map ecosystem services provided by deadwood islands located in managed forests. To this end, a geospatial analysis was developed in a case study in Italy to conduct an integrated investigation of ecosystem services provided inside and outside the deadwood islands (timber production, stand stability, outdoor recreation, biodiversity conservation). The innovative nature of this study is that it assessed ecosystem services provided by the deadwood islands within managed forests, an aspect that has not yet been investigated in the international literature. The results showed a positive correlation between the four ecosystem services provided by forests and in particular between: timber production and biodiversity conservation; outdoor recreation and stand stability; biodiversity conservation and stand stability. In addition, the results highlighted that the interventions implemented in the deadwood islands have a positive effect on the biodiversity conservation without compromising the provision of other ecosystem services. From a practical standpoint, the results of this study provide forest managers with insights into the impacts of deadwood islands on a wide range of ecosystem services, not just biodiversity. By doing so, managers can better understand the real impacts of this management system on forests.

References

Abildtrup J., Garcia S., Olsen S.B., & Stenger A., 2013, Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics, 92, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.001

Adeyemi A.A., & Adesoye P.O., 2016, Tree Slenderness Coefficient and Percent Canopy Cover in Oban Group Forest , Nigeria Tree Slenderness Coefficient and Percent Canopy Cover in Oban. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 6(4), 9–17.

Aerts R., 2013, Old Trees: Extraction, Conservation Can Coexist. Science, 339, 904–904.

Akujärvi A., Repo A., Akujärvi A.M., Liski J., 2021, Bridging mapping and simulation modelling in the ecosystem service assessments of boreal forests: effects of bioenergy production on carbon dynamics. Forest Ecosystems, 8, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00283-2

Ament J.M., Moore C.A., Herbst M., & Cumming G.S., 2017, Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies. Conservation Letters 10, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12283

Asbeck T., Pyttel P., Frey J., & Bauhus J., 2019, Predicting abundance and diversity of tree-related microhabitats in Central European montane forests from common forest attributes. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.043

Augustynczik A.L.D., Yousefpour R., Rodriguez L.C.E., & Hanewinkel M., 2018, Conservation Costs of Retention Forestry and Optimal Habitat Network Selection in Southwestern Germany. Ecological Economics, 148, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.013

Bachofen H., & Zingg A., 2001, Effectiveness of structure improvement thinning on stand structure in subalpine Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 145, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00581-8

Bayraktar S., Becagli C., & Paletto A., 2024, Young Generations’ Perception of Deadwood in Forest Landscapes: Insights from Turkish Students. South-East European Forestry, 15, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.24-15

Bayraktar S., Paletto A., & Floris A., 2020. Deadwood volume and quality in recreational forests: the case study of the Belgrade forest (Turkey). Forest Systems 29(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2020292-16560

Bayraktar S., Sefidi K., & Paletto A., 2025, Perceptions of deadwood among Iranian university students. International Forestry Review, 27, 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554825840319582

Baskent E.Z., Borges J.G., Kašpar J., & Tahri M., 2020, A design for addressing multiple ecosystem services in forest management planning. Forests, 11, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101108

Battisti C., Poeta G., & Fanelli G., 2016, An Introduction to Disturbance Ecology. A Road Map for Wildlife Management and Conservation, Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science). Springer, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32476-0_6

Bengtsson J., Bullock J.M., Egoh B., Everson C., Everson T., O’Connor T., O’Farrell P.J., Smith H.G., & Lindborg R., 2019, Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere, 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2582

Biber P., Schwaiger F., Poschenrieder W., & Pretzsch H., 2021, A fuzzy logic-based approach for evaluating forest ecosystem service provision and biodiversity applied to a case study landscape in Southern Germany. European Journal of Forest Research, 140, 1559–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01418-4

Biber P., Felton A., Nieuwenhuis M., Lindbladh M., Black K., Bahýl J., Bingöl Ö., Borges J.G., Botequim B., Brukas V., Bugalho M.N., Corradini G., Eriksson L.O., Forsell N., Hengeveld G.M., Hoogstra-Klein M.A., Kadıoǧullar A.I., Karahalil U., Lodin I., Lundholm A., Makrickienė E., Masiero M., Mozgeris G., Pivoriūnas N., Poschenrieder W., Pretzsch H., Sedmák R., & Tuček J., 2020, Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696

Bont L. G., Fraefel M., & Fischer C., 2018, A spatially explicit method to assess the economic suitability of a forest road network for timber harvest in steep terrain. Forests, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040169

Brockerhoff E.G., Barbaro L., Castagneyrol B., Forrester D.I., Gardiner B., González-Olabarria J.R., Lyver P.O.B., Meurisse N., Oxbrough A., Taki H., Thompson I.D., van der Plas F., & Jactel H., 2017, Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 3005–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2

Caglayan İ., Yeşil A., Cieszewski C., Gül F.K., & Kabak Ö., 2020, Mapping of recreation suitability in the Belgrad Forest Stands. Applied Geography, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102153

Canedoli C., Manenti R., & Padoa-Schioppa E., 2018, Birds biodiversity in urban and periurban forests: environmental determinants at local and landscape scales. Urban Ecosystems, 21, 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0757-7

Cantiani P., & Chiavetta U., 2015, Estimating the mechanical stability of Pinus nigra arn. Using an alternative approach across several plantations in central Italy. IForest, 8, 846–852. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1300-007

Cateau E., Parrot M., Roux A., Reyna K., Rossi M., Bruciamacchie M., & Vallauri D., 2013, Réseau d'îlots de vieux bois: Eléments de méthode et test dans les forêts publiques du Mont-Ventoux. WWF Rapport, Paris.

Cavard X., Macdonald S.E., Bergeron Y., & Chen H.Y.H., 2011, Importance of mixedwoods for biodiversity conservation: Evidence for understory plants, songbirds, soil fauna, and ectomycorrhizae in northern forests. Environmental Reviews, 19, 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1139/A11-004

Ciesielski M., & Stereńczak K., 2018, What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands. Journal of Environmental Management, 209, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.032

Ciesielski M., Gołos P., Wysocka-Fijorek M., & Kaliszewski A., 2024, Relationships between forest ecosystem services – current state of knowledge. Folia Forestali Polonica, 66, 228–248. https://doi.org/0.2478/ffp-2024-001

De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., & Boumans R.M.J., 2002, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

De Meo I., Cantiani M.G., Ferretti F., & Paletto A., 2018, Qualitative assessment of forest ecosystem services: The stakeholders’ point of view in support of landscape planning. Forests, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080465

De Meo I., Paletto A., & Cantiani M.G., 2015, The attractiveness of forests: Preferences and perceptions in a mountain community in Italy. Annals of Forest Research, 58, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2015.308

Dorren L.K.A., Berger F., Imeson A.C., Maier B., & Rey F., 2004, Integrity, stability and management of protection forests in the European Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 195, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.057

Drăgoi M., & Barnoaiea I., 2018, Accounting for windthrow risk in forest management planning: a Romanian tailor-made solution Marian. Forest Systems, 27.

Duncker P.S., Raulund-Rasmussen K., Gundersen P., Katzensteiner K., De Jong J., Ravn H.P., Smith M., Eckmüllner O., & Spiecker H., 2012, How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: Synergies and trade-offs. Ecology & Society, 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05066-170450

EC, 2023, Guidance on the Development of Public and Private Payment Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Service. Brussels: European Commission.

EC, 2021, New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. Brussels: European Commission.

Ehrlich P.R., & Ehrlich A.H., 1981, Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Random House Inc, New York.

Eid T., Fredrik Hoen H., & Økseter P., 2002, Timber production possibilities of the Norwegian forest area and measures for a sustainable forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00069-7

Faith D.P., Walker P.A., Ive J.R., & Belbin L., 1996, Integrating conservation and forestry production: exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 85, 251–260.

Gadow K., 2000, Evaluating risk in forest planning models. Silva Fennica, 34. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.639

Gao T., Hedblom M., Emilsson T., & Nielsen A.B., 2014, The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator. Forest Ecology and Management, 330, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.007

Gardiner B.A., Stagey G.R., Belcher R.E., & Wood C.J., 1997, Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability. Forestry, 70, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/70.3.233

Garrido P., Elbakidze M., & Angelstam P., 2017, Stakeholders’ perceptions on ecosystem services in Östergötland’s (Sweden) threatened oak wood-pasture landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.018

Gasparini P., & Tabacchi G., 2011, L’Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio INFC 2005. Secondo inventario forestale nazionale italiano. Metodi e risultati. Edagricole, Milano.

Ge Y., Chen H., Zhang M., & Li X., 2022. Area Threshold Interval of Urban Forest Patches Required to Maintain the Synergy between Biodiversity Conservation and Recreational Services: Case Study in Beijing, China. Forests, 13, 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111848

Golivets M., 2011, Aesthetic Values of Forest Landscapes. Master Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp.

Grilli G., De Meo I., Garegnani G., & Paletto A., 2017, A multi-criteria framework to assess the sustainability of renewable energy development in the Alps. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 1276–1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1216398

Grilli G., Paletto A., & De Meo I., 2014, Economic valuation of forest recreation in an alpine valley. Baltic Forestry, 20, 167–175.

Hagemann U., Moroni M.T., & Makeschin F., 2009, Deadwood abundance in Labrador high-boreal black spruce forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-166

Herold A., & Ulmer U., 2001, Stand stability in the Swiss National Forest Inventory: Assessment technique, reproducibility and relevance. Forest Ecology and Management, 145, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00572-7

Herrero C., Monleon V.J., Gómez N., & Bravo F., 2016, Distribution of dead wood volume and mass in Mediterranean Fagus sylvatica L. forests in Northern Iberian Peninsula. Implications for field sampling inventory. Forest Systems, 25(3), e069. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016253-09009

Hjältén J., Hägglund R., Löfroth T., Roberge J.M., Dynesius M., & Olsson J., 2017, Forest restoration by burning and gap cutting of voluntary set-asides yield distinct immediate effects on saproxylic beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1321-0

Holeksa J., Jaloviar P., Kucbel S., Saniga M., Svoboda M., Szewczyk J., Szwagrzyk J., Zielonka T., & Żywiec M., 2017, Models of disturbance driven dynamics in the West Carpathian spruce forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 388, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.026

Jankovska I., Straupe I., Brumelis G., Donis J., & Kupfere L., 2014, Urban forests of Riga, Latvia - pressures, naturalness, attitudes and management. Baltic Forestry, 20, 342–351.

Kays R., Parsons A.W., Baker M.C., Kalies E.L., Forrester T., Costello R., Rota C.T., Millspaugh J.J., & McShea W.J., 2017, Does hunting or hiking affect wildlife communities in protected areas? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12700

Kerr G., & Haufe J., 2011, Thinning practice. A Silvicultural Guide, Edinburgh. ed.

Kordi M., & Brandt S.A., 2012, Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.07.004

Krsnik G., Reynolds K.M., Murphy P., Paplanus S., Garcia-Gonzalo J., & González Olabarria J.R., 2023, Forest use suitability: Towards decision-making-oriented sustainable management of forest ecosystem services. Geography and Sustainability, 4, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.002

Lachat T., & Bütler R., 2008, Îlots de sénescence et arbres-habitat pour augmenter la biodiversité en forêt. La Forêt, 6, 20–21.

Lassauce A., Paillet Y., Jactel H., & Bouget C., 2011, Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: Meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecological Indicators 11(5), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004

Lee C.F., Huang H.I., & Yeh H.R., 2010, Developing an evaluation model for destination attractiveness: Sustainable forest recreation tourism in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18, 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003690478

Lingua F., Coops N.C., & Griess V.C., 2023, Assessing forest recreational potential from social media data and remote sensing technologies data. Ecological Indicators, 149, 110165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110165

Lombardi F., & Mali B., 2016, Deadwood as a driver of forest functions. Italian Journal of Agronomy 11(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1125-4718(24)00464-X

Lončarić D., Prodan M.P., & Dlačić J., 2021, Memorable tourism experiences inspired by the beauty of nature. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 27, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.20867/THM.27.2.5

Malczewski J., 1999, GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. 1st ed. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Schägner J.P., Grizzetti B., Drakou E.G., La Notte A., Zulian G., Bouraoui F., Luisa Paracchini M., Braat L., & Bidoglio G., 2012, Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004

Maes J., Hauck J., Paracchini M.L., Ratamäki O., Hutchins M., Termansen M., Furman E., Pérez-Soba M., Braat L., & Bidoglio G., 2013, Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.002

Maes J., Teller A., Erhard M., Condé S., Vallecillo S., Barredo J.I., Paracchini M.L., Abdul Malak D., Trombetti M., Vigiak O., Zulian G., Addamo A.M., Grizzetti B., Somma F., Hagyo A., Vogt P., Polce C., Jones A., Marin A.I., Ivits E., Mauri A., Rega C., Czúcz B., Ceccherini G., Pisoni E., Ceglar A., De Palma P., Cerrani I., Meroni M., Caudullo G., Lugato E., Vogt J.V., Spinoni J., Cammalleri C., Bastrup-Birk A., San Miguel J., San Román S., Kristensen P., Christiansen T., Zal N., de Roo A., Cardoso A.C., Pistocchi A., Del Barrio Alvarellos I., Tsiamis K., Gervasini E., Deriu I., La Notte A., Abad Viñas R., Vizzarri M., Camia A., Robert N., Kakoulaki G., Garcia Bendito E., Panagos P., Ballabio C., Scarpa S., Montanarella L., Orgiazzi A., Fernandez Ugalde O., & Santos-Martín F., 2020, Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment, EUR 30161 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Ispra, 2020. ISBN 978-92-76-17833-0, doi:10.2760/757183, JRC120383.

Marcantonio M., Rocchini D., Geri F., Bacaro G., Amici V., 2013, Biodiversity, roads, & landscape fragmentation: Two Mediterranean cases. Applied Geography, 42, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.001

Marchi M., Paletto A., Cantiani P., Bianchetto E., & de Meo I., 2018, Comparing thinning system effects on ecosystem services provision in artificial black pine (Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold) Forests. Forests, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040188

Marzano M., & Dandy N., 2012, Recreationist behaviour in forests and the disturbance of wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 2967–2986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0350-y

Marzetti S., Disegna M., Villani G., & Speranza M., 2011, Conservation and recreational values from semi-natural grasslands for visitors to two italian parks. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.505792

Mason F., & Zapponi L., 2016, The forest biodiversity artery: Towards forest management for saproxylic conservation. IForest, 9, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1657-008

Mazziotta A., Borges P., Kangas A., Halme P., & Eyvindson K., 2023, Spatial trade-offs between ecological and economical sustainability in the boreal production forest. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117144

Mazziotta A., Heilmann-Clausen J., Bruun H.H., Fritz Ö., Aude E., & Tøttrup A.P., 2016, Restoring hydrology and old-growth structures in a former production forest: Modelling the long-term effects on biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 381, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.028

Mazziotta A., Lundström J., Forsell N., Moor H., Eggers J., Subramanian N., Aquilué N., Morán-Ordóñez A., Brotons L., & Snäll T., 2022, More future synergies and less trade-offs between forest ecosystem services with natural climate solutions instead of bioeconomy solutions. Global Change Biology, 28, 6333–6348. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16364

MEA, 2005, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press: Washington, DC, USA.

Müller A., Olschewski R., Unterberger C., & Knoke T., 2020, The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning – A choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111008

Myster R.W., 2012, Ecotones between forest and grassland, Ecotones Between Forest and Grassland. Springer Science & Business Media, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3797-0

Notaro S., Grilli G., & Paletto A., 2019, The Role of Emotions on Tourists’ Willingness to Pay for the Alpine Landscape: a Latent Class Approach. Landscape Research, 44, 743–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1513129

Obiang Ndong G., Therond O., & Cousin I., 2020, Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic classification and review of the literature. Ecosystem Services, 43, 101120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101120

Paletto A., Bayraktar S., Becagli C., & De Meo I., 2023a, Young Generations’ Perception of the Role of Deadwood in Forests: Comparison between Italy and Türkiye. Ecologies, 4, 426–441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies4020027

Paletto A., Cantiani M.G., & De Meo I., 2015a, Public Participation in Forest Landscape Management Planning (FLMP) in Italy. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34, 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1026447

Paletto A., De Meo I., Grilli G., & Notaro S., 2023b, Valuing nature-based recreation in forest areas in Italy: An application of Travel Cost Method (TCM). Journal of Leisure Research, 54, 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2022.2115328

Paletto A., De Meo I., Cantiani P., & Ferretti F., 2014, Effects of forest management on the amount of deadwood in Mediterranean oak ecosystems. Annals of Forest Science 71, 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0377-1

Paletto A., Geitner C., Grilli G., Hastik R., Pastorella F., & Garcìa L.R., 2015b, Mapping the value of ecosystem services: A case study from the Austrian Alps. Annals of Forest Research, 58, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2015.335

Pastorella F., Giacovelli G., De Meo I., & Paletto A., 2017, People’s preferences for Alpine forest landscapes: Results of an internet-based survey. Journal of Forest Research, 22, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2017.1279708

Pastorella, F., Avdagić, A., Čabaravdić, A., Mraković, A., Osmanović, M., & Paletto, A., 2016, Tourists’ perception of deadwood in mountain forests. Annals of Forest Research, 59, 311–326. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2016.482.

Peña L., Casado-Arzuaga I., & Onaindia M., 2015, Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosystem Services, 13, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008

Phelps J., Jones C.A., Pendergrass J.A., & Gómez-Baggethun E., 2015, Environmental liability: A missing use for ecosystem services valuation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 112, E5370. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514893112

Piragnolo M., Pirotti F., Guarnieri A., Vettore A., & Salogni G., 2014, Geo-spatial support for assessment of anthropic impact on biodiversity. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 3, 599–618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3020599

Riccioli F., Fratini R., Fagarazzi C., Cozzi M., Viccaro M., Romano S., Rocchini D., Diaz S.E., & Tattoni C., 2020, Mapping the recreational value of coppices’ management systems in Tuscany. Sustainability, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198039

Rose O., & Callot H., 2007, Redécouverte de Phloeostichus denticollis Redtenbacher, 1842 dans le massif des Vosges (France) (Coleoptera, Phloeostichidae). L’Entomologiste, 63, 129–133.

Saaty T.L., 1990, How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_1

Sacher P., Meyerhoff J., & Mayer M., 2022, Evidence of the association between deadwood and forest recreational site choices. Forest Policy and Economics, 135, 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102638

Schägner J.P., Brander L., Maes J., & Hartje V., 2013, Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services, 4, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003

Schelhaas M.J., Kramer K., Peltola H., van der Werf D.C., Wijdeven S.M.J., 2007, Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Modelling, 207, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.025

Schwaiger F., Poschenrieder W., Biber P., & Pretzsch H., 2019, Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100993

Schwenk W.S., Donovan T.M., Keeton W.S., & Nunery J.S., 2012, Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: Comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Applications, 22, 1612–1627. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0864.1

Sedmák, R. et al., 2020, Optimizing the tending of forest stands with interactive decision maps to balance the financial incomes and ecological risks according to owner demands: case study in Rakovník, the Czech Republic. Forests, 11, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11070730

Seibold S., Bässler C., Brandl R., Gossner M.M., Thorn S., Ulyshen M.D., & Müller J., 2015, Experimental studies of dead-wood biodiversity - A review identifying global gaps in knowledge. Biological Conservation, 191, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.006

Selkimäki M., González-Olabarria J.R., Trasobares A., & Pukkala T., 2020, Trade-offs between economic profitability, erosion risk mitigation and biodiversity in the management of uneven-aged Abies alba Mill. stands. Annals of Forest Science, 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0914-z

Sergiacomi C., Floris A., Clementel F., & Paletto A., 2024, The economic value of the protective functions of mountain forests: A case study in the Italian Alps. Journal of Susainable Forestry 43, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2025.2451438

Sergiacomi C., & Paletto A., 2025, Mapping the monetary value of forest-based recreation: a case study in the Italian Carnic Prealps. Annals of Forest Research, 68, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2025.3515

Sergiacomi C., Vuletić D., Paletto A., & Fagarazzi C., 2022, Exploring tourist Preferences on the Visitor Management System: the Case Study of Plitvice Lakes National Park. South-east European Forestry, 13, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050717

Skłodowski J., Gołos P., Skłodowski M., & Ożga W., 2013, The preferences of visitors to selected forest areas for tourism and recreational purposes. The Forest Research Papers, 74, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2013-0028

Skrzyszewski J., & Pach M., 2020, The use of the slenderness coefficient in diagnosing wind damage risks. Acta Silvestria LVII, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.15576/actasilvestria/2020.lvii.7

Šmudla R., 2004, Utilisation of mathematical models and growth simulators for creating forest management plans and planning the tending felling. Journal of Forest Science, 50, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.17221/4664-jfs

TEEB, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations.

Termansen M., McClean C.J., & Jensen F.S., 2013, Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services. Ecological Economics, 92, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.001

Thrippleton T., Temperli C., Krumm F., Mey R., Zell J., Stroheker S., Gossner M.M., Bebi P., Thürig E., & Schweier J., 2023, Balancing disturbance risk and ecosystem service provisioning in Swiss mountain forests: an increasing challenge under climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 23, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-02015-w

Tiemann A., & Ring I., 2022, Towards ecosystem service assessment: Developing biophysical indicators for forest ecosystem services. Ecolological Indicators, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108704

Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H., & Kolehmainen O., 2003, Can ecological and aesthetic values be combined in urban forest management? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, 135–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00014

Vacchiano G., Berretti R., Mondino E.B., Meloni F., & Motta R., 2016, Assessing the effect of disturbances on the functionality of direct protection forests. Mountain Research and Development, 36, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00075.1

Wang X., Hua F., Wang L., Wilcove D.S., & Yu D.W., 2019, The biodiversity benefit of native forests and mixed-species plantations over monoculture plantations. Diversity and Distributions, 25, 1721–1735. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12972

Zadeh L.A., 1965, Fuzzy Sets. Infection Control, 8, 338–353.

Zapponi L., Minari E., Longo L., Toni I., Mason F., & Campanaro A., 2014, The Habitat-Trees experiment: using exotic tree species as new microhabitats for the native fauna. IForest, 8, 464–470. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1281-007

Ziernicka-Wojtaszek A., & Malec M., 2022, Evaluating Local Attractiveness for Tourism and Recreation—A Case Study of the Communes in Brzeski County, Poland. Land, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010039

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

1.
PALETTO, Alessandro and SERGIACOMI, Carlotta. Mapping of ecosystem services provided by deadwood islands in managed forests: An application in the Italian Alps. Ecological Questions. Online. 23 January 2026. Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-40. [Accessed 24 January 2026]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2026.007.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Forthcoming

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Alessandro Paletto, Carlotta Sergiacomi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 3
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

production forests, biodiversity conservation, stand stability, outdoor recreation, geospatial analysis
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop