Using acoustic indices in a protected wetland: a case study from Dragoman Marsh, Bulgaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2025.043Keywords
anurans, bioacoustics, birds, species richness, traffic noise, wetlandsAbstract
Protected areas are of crucial importance for biodiversity conservation, but reliable monitoring is often associated with great costs in terms of both funding and working hours. While in recent years a number of acoustic indices have been implemented for the purpose of passive monitoring of vocally active animal species, there is still insufficient data on the effects of interactions between different taxa and the influence of anthropogenic noise. This is especially true for diverse ecosystems such as wetlands, which provide a variety of habitats for both aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial animals, and are generally characterized by high species richness. The aim of this study was to establish whether three commonly used acoustic indices would be able to differentiate between vocal activity of birds and other animals, as well as traffic noise generated by passing vehicles in the protected wetland of Dragoman Marsh, Bulgaria. Using recordings from a SongMeter SM4, we registered a total of 47 bird species from 27 families, and a single frog species. We calculated three acoustic indices: ACI, ADI and AE. Although some indices (i.e., ACI) correlated with species diversity and could potentially be used to detect increase in traffic intensity, they are unlikely to differentiate between avian and anuran vocal activity.
References
Alcocer I., Lima H., Sugai L.S.M. & Llusia D., 2022, Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta-analysis. Biological Reviews 97: 2209-2236.
Bolgan M., Amorim C., Fonseca P., Di Iorio L. & Parmentier E., 2018, Acoustic Complexity of vocal fish communities: a field and controlled validation, Scientific Reports 8, doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28771-6
Budka M., Sokołowska E., Muszyńska A. & Staniewicz A., 2023, Acoustic indices estimate breeding bird species richness with daily and seasonally variable effectiveness in lowland temperate Białowieża forest, Ecological Indicators 148: 110027
Desjonquères C., Rybak F., Gasc A., Sueur J. & Pavoine S., 2020, Acoustic indices performed better than abundance and richness indices in estimating frog species diversity using passive acoustic recordings. Freshwater Biology 65(4): 670–681.
Duarte M., Caliari E., Scarpelli M., Lobregat G., Young R. & Sousa-Lima R., 2019, Effects of mining truck traffic on cricket calling activity, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146: 656-664.
Fairbrass A., Rennert P., William C., Titheridge H. & Jones K., 2017, Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas, Ecological Indicators 83: 169-177.
Farina A., Lattanzi E., Malavasi R., Pieretti N. & Piccioli L., 2011, Bird soundscape and the cognitive landscape approach: Theory, methods and perspectives, Landscape Ecology 26: 1257-1267.
Farina A., Lattanzi E., Piccioli L. & Pieretti N., 2012, Soundscape meter - bioacustic software user manual (The Urbino University, Urbino), pp. 1-33.
Fuller S., Axel A., Tucker D. & Gage S., 2015, Connecting soundscape to landscape: Which acoustic index bestdescribes landscape configuration?, Ecological Indicators 58: 207-215.
Gerhardt H.C & Schwartz J.J., 2001, Auditory tuning and frequency preferences in anurans (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC), pp. 73-85.
Goodwin S.E. & Shriver W.G., 2011, Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds, Conservation Biology 25: 406-411.
Greenwood J. & Robinson R., 2006, Principles of sampling (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 11-86.
Gridi-Papp M. (ed), 2003-2007, SoundRuler: Acoustic analysis for research and teaching, Available from: http://soundruler.sourceforge.net
HBW & BirdLife International, 2024, Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 9. Available at: http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v9_Oct24.zip
Indraswari K., Bower D., Tucker D., Schwarzkopf L., Towsey M. & Roe P., 2018, Assessing the value of acoustic indices to distinguish species and quantify activity: A case study using frogs. Freshwater Biology 65(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13222
Machado R., Aguiar L. & Jones G., 2017, Do acoustic indices reflect the characteristics of bird communities in the savannas of Central Brazil?, Landscape Urban Planning 162: 36-43.
Magurran A.E., Baillie S.R., Buckland S.T., Dick J.M., Elston D.A., Scott E.M., Smith R.I., Somerfield P.J. & Watt A.D., 2010, Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 574-582.
Mammides C., Goodale E., Dayananda S., Kang L. & Chen J., 2017, Do acoustic indices correlate with bird diversity? Insights from two biodiverse regions in Yunnan Province, south China, Ecological Indicators 82: 470-477.
Newport J., Shorthouse D.J. & Manning A.D., 2014, The effects of light and noise from urban development on biodiversity: implications for protected areas in Australia, Ecological Management & Restoration 15: 204-214.
Patricelli G.L. & Blickley J.L., 2006, Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment, The Auk 123: 639-649.
Pieretti N. & Farina A., 2013, Application of a recently introduced index for acoustic complexity to an avian soundscape with traffic noise, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 134: 891-900.
Pieretti N., Farina A. & Morri D., 2011, A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), Ecological Indicators 11: 868-873.
Pijanowski B.C., Farina A., Gage S., Dumyahn S. & Krause B., 2011b, What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science, Landscape Ecology 26: 1213-1232.
Pijanowski B.C., Villanueva-Rivera L.J., Dumyahn S., Farina A., Krause B., Napoletano B., Gage S. & Pieretti N., 2011a, Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in landscapes, BioScience 61: 203-216.
Qu Y. & Lu M., 2018, Identifying conservation priorities and management strategies based on ecosystem services to improve urban sustainability in Harbin, China, PeerJ 6: e4597
Revenga C., Campbell I., Abell R., de Villiers P. & Bryer M., 2005, Prospects for monitoring freshwater ecosystems towards the 2010 targets, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 397-413.
Roca I., Desrochers L., Giacomazzo M., Bertolo A., Bolduc P., Deschesnes R., Martin C.A, Rainville V., Rheault G. & Proulx R., 2016, Shifting song frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise: a meta-analysis on birds and anurans, Behavioral Ecology 27: 1269-1274.
Shurulinkov P., Hristov I., Hristov K., Nikolov I., Nikolov B., Velkov S., Dinkov H., Ralev A., Chakarov N., Ragyov D., Stanchev R., Spassov L. & Hristova, L., 2007, Birds of Dragoman marsh and Chepun hills, Western Bulgaria - list, status and recent development of water birds populations, Journal of Balkan Ecology 10: 251-264.
Slabbekoorn H. & den Boer-Visser A., 2006, Cities change the songs of birds, Current Biology 16: 2326-2331.
Sueur J., Farina A. 2015. Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics 8: 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x
Sueur J., Farina A., Gasc A., Pieretti N. & Pavoine S., 2014, Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 100: 772-781.
Sueur J., Pavoine S., Hamerlynck O. & Duvail S., 2008, Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal, PloS ONE 3: e4065.
Sordello R., De Lachapelle F.F., Livoreil B. & Vanpeene S., 2019, Evidence of the environmental impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map protocol, Environmental Evidence 8: doi:10.1186/s13750-019-0146-6
Summers P.D., Cunnington G.M. & Fahrig L., 2011, Are the negative effects of roads on breeding birds caused by traffic noise?, Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 1527-1534.
Zhao L., Sun X., Chen Q., Yang Y., Wang J., Ran J., Brauth S.E., Tang Y. & Cui J., 2018, Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog, Ecology and Evolution 8: 11733-11741.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simeon Lukanov, Boris Nikolov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 73
Number of citations: 0