Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

On the notion of value. A comparative analysis between economic and biophysical approaches
  • Home
  • /
  • On the notion of value. A comparative analysis between economic and biophysical approaches
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 35 No. 1 (2024): Special Issue “Exploring the scientific literature on controversial and timely ecological questions” /
  4. Articles

On the notion of value. A comparative analysis between economic and biophysical approaches

Authors

  • Giulio Corsi International PhD Programme / UNESCO Chair “Environment, Resources and Sustainable Development”, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy
  • Elvira Buonocore International PhD Programme / UNESCO Chair “Environment, Resources and Sustainable Development”, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy; Department of Business and Economics, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy
  • Pier Paolo Franzese International PhD Programme / UNESCO Chair “Environment, Resources and Sustainable Development”, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy; Department of Business and Economics, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2024.041

Keywords

theory of value, valuation, biophysical accounting

Abstract

The plurality of dimensions and topics covered by the SDGs reflects the need to assess the value of organizations, cities, and societies using a holistic approach that considers different dimensions and criteria. It is much needed to shift towards inter-disciplinary, multi-criteria and integrated perspectives, opening the door to views able to consider different scientific points of view when assessing the most “valuable” pillars in human societies. This need highlights a controversial question: “what do we mean when we refer to a concept so broad such as the one of “value” and its measurement”? The concept of value and welfare have changed throughout the years, also in relation to the historical context and societal structure and needs of the time. But time has not been the only factor in differentiating value theories. While most organically structured definitions of value have originated, as expected, from the developments of the economic discipline, this issue has also been addressed by scientists belonging to the biophysical realm. In this paper, a comparative overview of the main economic and biophysical value theories, developing from very different epistemological backgrounds, is provided. Results suggest the need to foster inter-disciplinary communication on the notion of value, which is an abstract construct at the root of our societies and economies.

References

Alcamo, J., & et al. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment (MEA). http://www.who.int/entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf

Alchian, A. A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 211–221.

Beder, S. (1996). Charging the earth : The promotion of price-based measures for pollution control. Ecological Economics, 16, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00078-CI

Beder, S. (2011). Environmental economics and ecological economics: The contribution of interdisciplinarity to understanding, influence and effectiveness. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291100021X

Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (excerpt). https://doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2013.0.822

Bobulescu, R. (2015). From Lotka ’ s biophysics to Georgescu-Roegen ’ s bioeconomics. 120, 194–202.

Burkett, P. (2003). The Value Problem in Ecological Economics. Organization & Environment, 16(2), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026603016002001

Chee, Y. E. (2004). An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 120(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028

Cleveland, C. J. (1999). Biophysical Economics: From Physiocracy to Ecological Economics and Industrial Ecology. Bioeconomics and Sustainability, 617, 125–154.

Cordes, C. (2007). Turning Economics into an Evolutionary Science: Veblen, the Selection Metaphor, and Analogical Thinking. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(1), 135–154.

Costanza, R. (1980). Embodied Energy and Economic Valuation. Science, 210. https://doi.org/10.1126/J

Costanza, R. (1989). What Is Ecological Economics? Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4876.003.0006

Dale, G. (2020). Rule of nature or rule of capital ? Physiocracy , ecological economics , and ideology. Globalizations, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807838

Daly, H. E. (1993). Steady-State Economics: A New Paradigm. New Literary History, 24(4), 811–816.

Davidson, M. D. (2013). On the relation between ecosystem services, intrinsic value, existence value and economic valuation. Ecological Economics, 95, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.002

Dionisio, A., Menezes, R., & Mendes, D. A. (2006). An econophysics approach to analyse uncertainty in financial markets: An application to the Portuguese stock market. European Physical Journal B, 50(1–2), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2006-00113-2

Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J. O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics, 179(January 2020), 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824

Dosi, G., & Egidi, M. (1991). Substantive and procedural uncertainty. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55071

Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics. Evolutionary Economics, 4.

Douai, A. L. I. (2009). Value Theory in Ecological Economics: The Contribution of a Political Economy of Wealth. Environmental Values, 18(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109X12474739376415

Drakopoulos, S., & Katselidis, I. (2013). From Edgeworth to Econophysics : A Methodological Perspective. MPRA.

Franzese, P.P., Rydberg, T., Russo, G.F., Ulgiati, S. (2009). Sustainable biomass production: A comparison between Gross Energy Requirement and Emergy Synthesis methods. Ecological Indicators, 9 (5), pp. 959-970.

Franzese, P.P., Brown, M.T., Ulgiati, S. (2014). Environmental accounting: Emergy, systems ecology, and ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling, 271, pp. 1-3.

Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. In University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002

Galiani, F. (1750). Della Moneta.

Georgescu Roegen, N. (1970). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process.

Georgescu Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41(3), 347–381.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977). The steady state and ecological salvation: A Thermodynamic analysis. BioScience, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830413

Giocoli, N. (1999). La teoria del valore di Ferdinando Galiani : un ’ interpretazione unitaria. 257–258.

Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007

Gowdy, J., & Mesner, S. (1998). The evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconomics. Review of Social Economy, 56(2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769800000016

Gramm, W. S. (1988). The movement from real to abstract value theory, 1817-1959. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035056

Halkos, G. E. (2011). The evolution of environmental thinking in economics. MPRA, 35580.

Heinzel, C. (2013). Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes060

Hornborg, A. (1998). Commentary: Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: Articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00100-6

Hornborg, A. (2016). Post-Capitalist Ecologies: Energy, “Value” and Fetishism in the Anthropocene. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 27(4), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1196229

Hornborg, A. (2019). The Money-Energy-Technology Complex and Ecological Marxism: Rethinking the Concept of “Use-value” to Extend Our Understanding of Unequal Exchange, Part 1. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 30(3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1440614

Hornborg, A. (2022). Why ecological economics should not adopt Marxian value theory. Ecological Economics, 193(August 2021), 107334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107334

Jevons, S. W. (1871). The Theory of Political Economy.

Keen, S. (2003). Standing on the toes of pygmies: Why econophysics must be careful of the economic foundations on which it builds. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 324(1–2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01851-4

King J.E. and McLure M.. (2014). History of the Concept of Value. University of Western Australia - Economics Discussion Papers, 14.06.

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. https://doi.org/10.34156/9783791046006-108

Kondepudi, D., & Prigogine, I. (2015). Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 36, Issue 08). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-4495

Kumar, M., & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008

Malthus, T. R. (1820). Principles of Political Economy.

Mantegna, R. N., Stanley, H. E., & Chriss, N. A. (2000). An Introduction to Econophysics. Physics Today, 53(12), 70–70. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1341926

Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. In Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.2307/2956644

Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The Environmentalism of the poor.

Marx, K. (1951). Theories of Surplus Value.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital Volume I.

Meek, R. L. (1973). Studies in the Labor Theory of Value.

Melgar-Melgar, R. E., & Hall, C. A. S. (2020). Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: The biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems. Ecological Economics, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106567

Menger, C. (1871). Principles of Economics. http://mises.org/Books/mengerprinciples.pdf

Mill, J. S. (1836). On the definition and method of political economy. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.003

Mirowski, P. (1989). More heat than light - Economics as social physics: Physics as nature’s economics.

Missemer, A. (2018). Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and degrowth. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

National Research Council. (2005). Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. In The National Academies Press. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11139

Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental Accounting: EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making. In John Wiley & Sons.

Odum, H. T., and Odum, E. P. (2000). The Energetic Basis for Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Ecosystems, 3, 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000005

Otte B.A. Hons, G. (2014). Deconstructing Value Theory in Economics: A trans-disciplinary historical critique of the supply and demand template. In University of Tasmania. http://www.springer.com/series/15440%0Apapers://ae99785b-2213-416d-aa7e-3a12880cc9b9/Paper/p18311

Pareto, V. (1906). Manual of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2008-035

Pearce, D. (2002). An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27, 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083429

Persons, C. E. (1913). Marginal utility and marginal disutility as ultimate standards of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27(4), 547–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883442

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. https://doi.org/10.2307/2222816

Pirgmaier, E. (2021). The value of value theory for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106790

Quesnay, F. (1759). Tableau Economique.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. In Chelsea Green Publishing.

Rickles, D. (2007). Econophysics for philosophers. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Vol. 38, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.01.003

Rodríguez, R. A., & Cáceres-Hernández, J. J. (2018). Information, entropy, value, and price formation: An econophysical perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 512, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.005

Røpke, I. (2021). From value to valuation and appropriation. A comment on Pirgmaier’s paper “The value of value theory for ecological economics.” Ecological Economics, 187(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107102

Schinckus, C. (2009). Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 388(20), 4415–4423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.07.008

Schinckus, C. (2010a). Econophysics and economics: Sister disciplines? American Journal of Physics, 78(4), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3309424

Schinckus, C. (2010b). Is econophysics a new discipline? the neopositivist argument. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389(18), 3814–3821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.05.016

Schulz, A. W. (2013). Beyond the Hype: The Value of Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393112463336

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. In Harvard University Press. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496199

Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983911-11

Simon, H. A. (1964). Theories of Bounded Rationality.

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In S.M. Soares, MetaLibri Digital Library (Issue 2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/2057-1615.12058

Stigler, G. J. (1958). Ricardo and the 93% Labor Theory of Value. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 357–367.

Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7

Ulgiati, S., Zucaro, A., & Franzese, P. P. (2011). Shared wealth or nobody’s land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 70, 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.015

Veblen, T. (1898). Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882952

Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class.

Veblen, T. (1921). The Engineers and the Price System. In Batoche Books. http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/michels/polipart.pdf

Viaggi, D., Bartolini, F., & Raggi, M. (2021). The Bioeconomy in economic literature: looking back, looking ahead. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 10(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-10881

Vihervaara, P., Franzese, P.P., Buonocore, E. (2019). Information, energy, and eco-exergy as indicators of ecosystem complexity. Ecological Modelling, 395, pp. 23-27.

von Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1894). The ultimate standard of value. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 5(2), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629400500201

Walras, L. (1874). Elements of pure economics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888958.

Wierenga, M. (2003). A Brief Introduction to Environmental Economics. ELAW. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429287855-5.

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

1.
CORSI, Giulio, BUONOCORE, Elvira and FRANZESE, Pier Paolo. On the notion of value. A comparative analysis between economic and biophysical approaches. Ecological Questions. Online. 1 July 2024. Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-27. [Accessed 20 May 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2024.041.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2024): Special Issue “Exploring the scientific literature on controversial and timely ecological questions”

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 316
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

theory of value, valuation, biophysical accounting
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop