Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

Traditional knowledge, attitude and behaviour of indigenous people towards endangered wildlife conservation in Kon Plong District, Vietnam
  • Home
  • /
  • Traditional knowledge, attitude and behaviour of indigenous people towards endangered wildlife conservation in Kon Plong District, Vietnam
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 35 No. 4 (2024) /
  4. Articles

Traditional knowledge, attitude and behaviour of indigenous people towards endangered wildlife conservation in Kon Plong District, Vietnam

Authors

  • Huong Nguyen Thi Thien Faculty of Forest Resources and Environmental Management, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Manh Hung Bui Vietnam National University of Forestry https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-8812
  • Andrzej Nienartowicz
  • Hai Dong Thanh
  • Dung Nguyen Quoc
  • Siu A
  • Vy Tran Huu
  • Lynn Smith

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2024.044

Keywords

Community conservation, Ethnic minorities, Kon Plong Forest, Endangered wildlife, PRA tools, SPSS

Abstract

Indigenous knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of local people are very important concepts for wildlife conservation. Endangered wildlife species that live in Kon Plong forests have been under pressure from the communities living around them, including wildlife hunting, trapping, capturing, illegal logging, and encroachment for residential and production land. This study aims to understand the knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of indigenous people towards endangered wildlife in order to protect these species. Some participatory rural appraisal tools were used to discuss the situation and collect information in nine villages of four communes in Kon Plong District from December 2019 to March 2020. The results showed that the levels of knowledge about endangered wildlife among indigenous people in communes were statistically different. People’s knowledge of the law influenced their behaviour. Gender had the greatest influence on the level of knowledge. Most indigenous people had a positive attitude and wanted to protect endangered animals. “Commune” and “culture” were the two factors affecting people’s attitudes. “Commune”, “culture”, and the level of understanding affected the hunting behaviour of people. Negative human impacts have seriously influenced endangered wildlife species. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a long-term conservation strategy and plan, including the establishment of Kon Plong Special-Use Forests, supporting livelihoods for local people, communicating, and raising awareness among local people, and increasing the participation of community organisations.

References

Abigail Anderson, Sophia Chilczuk, Kaylie Nelson, Roxanne Ruther, & Wall-Scheffler, C. (2023). The Myth of Man the Hunter: Women’s contribution to the hunt across ethnographic contexts. PLoS ONE, 18(6), e0287101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287101

Akongte Peter Njukang, Seino Richard Akwanjoh, Tsi Evaristus Angwafor, Mvo Denis Chuo, & Amin, a. N. T. (2019). Knowledge, Attitudes and perceptions of the local people towards the conservation of the NigeriaCameroon Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes ellioti) in the Tofala

Hill Wildlife Sanctuary (THWS), South West Region, Cameroon. International journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research(IJREH), 3(1), 9.

Belinda Low, Siva R. Sundaresan, Ilya R. Fischhoff, & Rubenstein, D. I. (2009). Partnering with local communities to identify conservation priorities for endangered Grevy’s zebra. Biological Conservation, 142, 1548-1555.

Bruchac, M. (2014). Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Knowledge. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, 11.

Bui Dinh Toai, & Ngai, N. B. (1998). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) in agricultural and forestry extension activities. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agriculture Publishing House.

Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga, Sebastian Vengesayi, Edson Gandiwa, & Muboko, a. N. (2015). Community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism: A case study of communities adjacent to four protected areas in Zimbabwe. Tropical Conservation Science, 8, 19.

Committee, K. P. D. P. s. (2020). Kon Plong district statistical yearbook. Kontum province, Vietnam: Kon Tum Provincial Statistics Office

Dahlberg, F. (1983). Woman the Gatherer. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Darmadi, Sukendi, Saam Z., & Suwondo (2023), Conservation Management Model of Subayang River in the Kampar Regency, Province of Riau based on Local Wisdom using Belida Fish (Chitala sp.) as Bioindicator Ecological Questions 34(3:) 7–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2023.025

Eames, J. C., Kuznetsov, A. N., Monastyrskii, A. L., Nguyen Tien Hiep, Nguyen Quang Truong, & Quynh, H. Q. (2001). A Preliminary Biological Assessment of Kon Plong Forest Complex, Kon Tum Province, Vietnam. Retrieved from Hanoi, Vietnam:

Elissa L. Pearson, Sarah Mellish, Emily M. McLeod, Ben Sanders, & Ryan, J. C. (2022). Can we save Australia’s endangered wildlife by increasing species recognition? Journal for Nature Conservation, 69, 1-12.

Fajrina A.N., Hijri Y.S., Roziqin A., & Rezeki A. (2023), Collaborative governance of Narsalis larvatus (Wurmb, 1787) conservation in Barito Kuala Regency, Indonesia. Ecological Questions 34(1): 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2023.005

Hai, D. T. (2016). Study and develop a monitoring program for important mammal species in Thuong Tien Nature Reserve, Hoa Binh province, Vietnam. Journal of Forestry Science and Technology, 1, 14-21. https://doc.arcgis.com/en/survey123/reference/whatissurvey123.htm.

Jafari R. Kideghesho, Julius W. Nyahongo, Shombe N. Hassan, C.Tarimo, T., & Mbije, a. N. E. (2006). Factors and Ecological Impacts of Wildlife Habitat Destruction in the Serengeti Ecosystem in Northern Tanzania. AJEAM-RAGEE, 11, 17-32.

Jai N. Mehta, & Heinen, a. J. T. (2001). Does Community-Based Conservation Shape Favorable Attitudes Among Locals? An Empirical Study from Nepal. Environmental Management, 28, 165-177.

Jha K.K., Radhika Jha R., & O’Neil Campbell M. (2021), The Distribution, Nesting Habits and Status of Endangered Vulture Species in Protected Areas of Central India. Ecological Questions 32(3): 7–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.20

Lee RB, & I, D. (1968). Man the Hunter. New York: Routledge.

Long, T. T., & al., e. (2016). Participatory Biodiversity Monitoring: Guiding methods Hanoi, Vietnam: SNV Netherlands Development Organisation.

Koleva V., Koynova T., Dragoeva A., Kolev N., Kuleva I., Natchev N. (2024), Benefits for visitors provided by protected areas in Bulgaria and willingness to become a conservation volunteer Ecological Questions 35(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2024.016

Madhav Gadgil, C. F., and Fikret Berkers. (1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. AMBIO, 22, 151-156.

Mark Infield, & Namara, a. A. (2001). Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx, 35(1), 48-60.

Mekonen, S. (2017). Roles of Traditional Ecological Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 7, 21-27.

Nam, H. (2016). Documentary of Microsoft Excel. Hanoi, Vietnam: University of Engineering and Technology.

Nguyen Duy Can, & Vromant, N. (2009). PRA - Participatory Rural Appraisal of locals. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agriculture Publishing House.

Nguyen Hai Tuat, & Binh, N. T. (2005). Exploiting and applying SPSS to process research data in forestry. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam National University of Forestry.

Nguyen Kinh Chi, & Chi, N. D. (2011). Ba Na people in the Central Highlands (in Vietnammese): Tri Thuc Publisher.

Viglia S., Nienartowicz A., Kunz M., Franzese P.-P. (2013). Integrating Environmental Accounting, Life Cycle and Ecosystem Services Assessment. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 1 (4): 307–319.

Songorwa, A. N. (1999). Community-Based Wildlife Management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the Communities Interested? World Development, 27(12), 2061-2079.

Teri D Allendorf, Myint Aung, & Songer, M. (2012). Using residents' perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 36-43.

Thuan, D. D. (2002). Experience in developing social forestry in some Asian countries and applying to Vietnam's conditions. National Economics University, Hanoi.

Tßepo, M., & Chaba, M. (2004). The Role of Indigenous Knowledge in Biodiversity Conservation in the Lesotho Highlands: Exploring indigenous epistemology. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 37-49.

Grande U., Piernik A., Nienartowicz A., Buonocore E. & Franzese, P. P. (2023). Measuring natural capital value and ecological complexity of lake ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 482, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.

Wearn, O. R., Trinh Dinh, H., Ngyuen Quyet, T., Dao Cong, A., Le Viet, M., Tran Ngoc, T., & … Nguyen, A. (2021). Myth to reality in the forests of Kon Plong: The exceptional biodiversity value of Kon Plong District, Kon Tum Province. Retrieved from Fauna & Flora

International – Vietnam Programme, Hanoi, Vietnam:

Wojciechowski, Kaszycka, & Otadoy. (2021). Utilizing local community knowledge of the Philippine tarsier in assessing the Bilar population endangerment risk, and implications for conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 62, 1-10.

Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, USA: Prentice Hall.

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2024-07-21

How to Cite

1.
NGUYEN THI THIEN, Huong, BUI, Manh Hung, NIENARTOWICZ, Andrzej, DONG THANH, Hai, NGUYEN QUOC, Dung, A, Siu, TRAN HUU, Vy and SMITH, Lynn. Traditional knowledge, attitude and behaviour of indigenous people towards endangered wildlife conservation in Kon Plong District, Vietnam. Ecological Questions. Online. 21 July 2024. Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 19-29. [Accessed 29 June 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2024.044.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Huong Nguyen Thi Thien, Manh Hung Bui, Andrzej Nienartowicz, Hai Dong Thanh, Dung Nguyen Quoc, Siu A, Vy Tran Huu, Lynn Smith

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 643
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Community conservation, Ethnic minorities, Kon Plong Forest, Endangered wildlife, PRA tools, SPSS
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop