The Scientific Research on Environmental Accounting: A Bibliometric Network Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2024.008Keywords
Environmental accounting, ecosystem accounting, natural resources, bibliometric network analysis, VOSviewerAbstract
Environmental accounting refers to methodologies aimed at assessing natural resources and the impacts human activities generate on them. Over the past few years, there has been an increasing interest in environmental accounting both in scientific and policy contexts, which recognize its important role in assessing the environmental costs and impacts generated by humans on natural ecosystems. In this study, we explored the global scientific literature on environmental accounting over the last fifty years. Based on scientific publications data, the VOSviewer software was used to generate network maps on environmental accounting displaying the relationships among scientific journals, keywords, researchers, and countries. In total, environmental accounting resulted to be the subject of 1,603 publications. The main keywords related to environmental accounting were “sustainable development”, “environmental economics”, and “sustainability”, highlighting the important role played by environmental accounting tools for assessing environmental sustainability. In addition, United Kingdom, United States, and Italy, resulted the top countries in the research field of environmental accounting. In conclusion, the application of systems thinking in bibliometric science allowed a broad investigation of the research on environmental accounting, resulting a valuable approach for identifying trends and gaps in this research area.
References
Ahmad Y. J., El Serafy S., Lutz E.,1989, Environmental accounting for sustainable development (English). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Bagstad K. J., Ingram J. C., Lange G. M., Masozera M., Ancona Z. H., Bana M., Kagabo D., Musana B., Nabahungu N. L., Rukundo E., Rutebuka E., Polasky S., Rugege D., & Uwera C., 2020, Towards ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in flows and potential supply of ecosystem services. People and Nature, 2(1), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10062
Bartelmus P., 2015, Do we need ecosystem accounts? In Ecological Economics (Vol. 118). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.026
Boyd J., Banzhaf S., 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
Bruzón A. G., Arrogante-Funes P., de Anguita P. M., Novillo C. J., Santos-Martín, F., 2022, How the ecosystem extent is changing: A national-level accounting approach and application. Science of the Total Environment, 815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152903
Buonocore E., Picone F., Russo G. F., Franzese, P. P., 2018, The scientific research on Natural Capital: A bibliometric network analysis. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 6(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2018.12.010
Buonocore, E., Grande, U., Franzese, P.P., Russo, G.F., 2021,Trends and evolution in the concept of marine ecosystem services: An overview. Water (Switzerland), 13 (15), art. no. 2060. DOI: 10.3390/w13152060
Chen B., Chen G. Q., 2007, Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy-a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.009
Deegan C., 2013, The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet…really? A reflection on “green accounting and green eyeshades twenty years later.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.04.004
Edens B., Hein L., 2013, Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accounting. Ecological Economics, 90, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.003
Edens B., Maes J., Hein L., Obst C., Siikamaki J., Schenau, S., Javorsek M., Chow J., Chan J. Y., Steurer A., Alfieri A., 2022, Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard. Ecosystem Services, 54(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101413
Fry J., Lenzen M., Giurco D., Pauliuk S., 2016, An Australian Multi-Regional Waste Supply-Use Framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(6), 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12376
Galos K., Nieć M., Saługa P. W., Uberman R., 2015, The basic problems of mineral resources valuation methodologies within the framework of System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounts. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, 31(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/gospo-2015-0034
Galychyn O., Buonocore E., Franzese P. P., 2020, Exploring the global scientific literature on urban metabolism. Ecological Questions, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2020.031
Grande, U., Piernik, A., Nienartowicz, A., Buonocore, E., Franzese, P.P., 2023, Measuring natural capital value and ecological complexity of lake ecosystems Ecological Modelling, 482, art. no. 110401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110401
Gundimeda H., Sukhdev P., Sinha R. K., Sanyal S., 2007, Natural resource accounting for Indian states - Illustrating the case of forest resources. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.035
Häyhä T., Franzese P. P., 2014, Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. In Ecological Modelling (Vol. 289). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.002
Hecht, J. E., 2000, Lessons Learned from Environmental Accounting: Findings from Nine Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: IUCN – The World Conservation Union, vi + 42 pp.
Hecht J. E., 2007a, National environmental accounting: A practical introduction. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000001
Hecht J. E., 2007b, National Environmental Accounting: Bridging the Gap Between Ecology And Economy. News.Ge, https://news.ge/anakliis-porti-aris-qveynis-momava.
Hein L., Bagstad K. J., Obst C., Edens B., Schenau S., Castillo G., Soulard F., Brown C., Driver A., Bordt M., Steurer A., Harris R., Caparrós, A., 2020, Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems. Science, 367(6477), 514–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8901
Hein L., Remme R. P., Schenau S., Bogaart P. W., Lof M. E., Horlings E., 2020, Ecosystem accounting in the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101118
Heris M., Bagstad K. J., Rhodes C., Troy A., Middel A., Hopkins K. G., Matuszak J., 2021, Piloting urban ecosystem accounting for the United States. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101226
Lange G. M., 2004, Wealth, natural capital, and sustainable development: Contrasting examples from Botswana and Namibia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(3), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-4045-z
Lutz E., 1993, Toward Improved Accounting for the Environment. The World Bank.
Magrath W., Arens, P., 1989, The World Bank Policy Planning and Research Staff. The Costs of Soil Erosion on Java: A Natural. Resource Accounting Approach. 18.
Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J., Behrens III W. W., 1972, Limits to growth. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 367–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63768-0.00630-2
Obst C., Hein L., Edens B., 2016, National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1
Obst C., Vardon, M., 2014, Recording environmental assets in the national accounts. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru003
Otte E., Rousseau R., 2002, Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
Padhan D., Das A., 2022, Physical and monetary asset accounting of mineral resources in India. Resources Policy, 78(October 2021), 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102902
Pauna V. H., Buonocore E., Renzi M., Russo G. F., Franzese P. P., 2019, The issue of microplastics in marine ecosystems: A bibliometric network analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 149(August), 110612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110612
Pauna Valentina H., Picone F., Le Guyader G., Buonocore E., Franzese P. P., 2018, The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2018.022
Repetto R., Magrath W., Well M., Beer C., Rossini F., 1989, Wasting assets: natural resources in the national income accounts. In Wasting assets: natural resources in the national income accounts.
Reuters, 2008, Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Introduction: the main tool of science. 8.
Skaf L., Buonocore E., Dumontet S., Capone R., Franzese P. P., 2020, Applying network analysis to explore the global scientific literature on food security. Ecological Informatics, 56(January), 101062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101062
Stahmer C., 1997, Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Social Costs and Sustainability, 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60365-5_7
Temple J., 2002, Growth Effects of Education and Social Capital in the OECD Countries. 27(4), 5–46.
Zou X., Yue W. L., Vu H. Le., 2018, Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of urban vitality research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040988.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Razane El Alam, Umberto Grande, Elvira Buonocore, Alessandro Paletto, Pier Paolo Franzese
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 469
Number of citations: 0
