A Study on the Socioeconomics of Imperata Grassland Managers at Dargakona Village, Barak Valley, Assam, Northeast India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2023.046Keywords
Socioeconomics, traditional, thatch grass, smallholder farmer, grassland managerAbstract
Socioeconomic profile of farmers has great implications in present days for providing insight into demography, education, income and management of bio-resources. The small scale farmers of rural regions have indeed conserved the indigenous and traditional facts since past generations that eventually redefined as traditional ecological knowledge. Hence, keeping in view, the socioeconomic structure of the villages in Barak Valley region, the grassland managers of agricultural communities could be recognized as a great storehouse of traditional knowledge that play a vital role towards various land recuperation processes. The study was carried out at Dargakona village, Barak Valley, Assam, northeast India with an objective to identify factors that regulate the socioeconomic characteristics of rice farmers and measures to be adopted for improvement of their status. Data were collected from 48 households that were randomly sampled through questionnaire survey and structured interview schedule. The dominant inhabitants of the village were Deshawali (56.30%), Bardhamani (36.70%) and Koibarta (7%) in order of their proportionate share of the population. The average family size indicated almost identical size among the population below 14 years as well as above 30 years of age. Education status expressed low rate of literacy with 41% had no experience of school learning. Roofing pattern of houses indicated maximum use of thatch grass as raw material. The age of the grasslands varied from 10 years to more than 40 years. The rice farmers classified four soil types i.e. ‘lal’, ‘balu’, ‘athail’ and ‘citta’. Majority (50%) of the respondents were found with marginal land holdings of one bigha or less. About 23% of the farm natives briefed that the yield of their grasslands amounts to 1000 gollas (a local unit for cash transaction) of dried leaves per annum. Although much of the farmers are in favor of grassland management but still there are people who wants replacement with plantation of economically important species. The Imperata grasslands are generally managed for both subsistence and income generation. The study concluded that there is an urgent need of Government, NGO and other stakeholders to intervene and study the issues and challenges of the small scale farmers. Thereafter, proper policies may be formulated in restoration of the degraded grasslands and improving the socioeconomic status of the village communities residing in Barak Valley, Assam, northeast India.
References
Astapati A.D. & Das A.K., 2010, Biomass and net primary production in an Imperata grassland of Barak Valley, Assam, Northeast India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 36(2–3): 147–155.
Astapati A. D. & Das A. K., 2023, Local soil knowledge of Imperata grasslands in Barak Valley, Assam, northeast India. International Journal of Global Science Research 10(1): 1922– 1927.
Brown K., 1997, Plain tales from the grasslands: Extraction, value and utilization of biomass in Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 59– 74.
Chambers R., Pacey A. & Thrupp L.A.,1989, Farmer first: farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K.
Deka U. & DuttaT., 2018, Study on socioeconomic status of wetland dependent communities of Kaplabeel of Barpeta district of Assam, India: A case study. NeBIO 9(2): 223–227.
Deka S., Nath R.K., Sehgal M., Barbora A.C., Kakati R.K. & Ahuja D.B., 2017, Socio-economic status of tribal farmers of Tinsukia district of Assam: A Case Study. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(9): 1–5. Disssanayake D.M.A.P.,
Wijesuriya W., Herath H.M.L.K. & Gunaratne P.K.K.S., 2013, Socioeconomic status of smallholder rubber farmers in the Moneragala District. Journal of food and Agriculture 3(1–2): 41–49.
Friday K.S., Drilling M.E. & Garrity D., 1999, ImperataGrassland Rehabilitation using Agroforestry and Assisted Natural Regeneration. International Centre for Research in Agro forestry, Southeast Asian Regional Research Program, Bogor, Indonesia.
Garrity D.P. & Agustin P.C., 1995, Historical land use evolution in a tropical acid upland agroecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystemsand Environment 53: 83–95.
Gogoi J., Hzaraika J.P., BarmanU. & Deka N., 2020, Comparative Study of Input Use, Productivity and Profitability of Hybrid and Traditional Rice Cultivation in Assam, India. Economic Affairs 65(3): 389–394.
Gopalakrishnan R., 2000, Assam: Land and People. Omsons Publications, New Delhi.
Gupta T. & Dey M., 2015, Socioeconomic and cultural profile of fish farmers: a study in and around the Lumding town, Nagaon district of Assam. Indian Journal of Environmental Sciences 19(1 & 2): 71–78.
Hairiah K., Noordwijk M. & Purnomosidhi P., 2000, Reclamation of Imperata Grassland using Agroforestry. ICRAF, Bogor, Indonesia.
Lehmkuhl J.F., Upreti R.K. & Sharma U.R., 1988, National parks and local development: grasses and people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 15: 143–148.
Mishra H.R., 1982, Balancing human needs and conservation in Nepal’s Royal Chitwan National Park. Ambio 6: 246–257.
Nath A.J., Sileshi G.W. & Das A.K., 2018, Bamboo based family forests offer opportunities for biomass production and carbon farming in North East India. Land Use Policy 75: 191–200.
Nath R.K., Sarma B., Choudhury M., Ahmed P., Upamanya G.K., Khayer S.M., Rahman M., Sarma G.K., Ahmed F.A. & Sarma R., 2021, Socio economic status of farming community of Char area of Dhubri District, Assam. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology 39(9): 14–20.
Olarinde O. & Olusola J.A., 2018, Socio-economic impacts of charcoal production in Oke- Ogun area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Tropical Plant Research 5(1): 46–52.
Pathak K., Nath A.J., Das A.K. & BharM., 2018, Litter dynamics in Imperata cylindrica grassland under culturally managed system in North East India. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 56(2): 99–106.
Potter L., Lee J. & Thorburn K., 2000, Reinventing Imperata: Revaluing Alang – Alang Grasslands in Indonesia. Development and Change 31(5): 1037–1053.
Rahman F. & Ansari A.A., 2007, Changing trend in Tharu tribe of Uttar Pradesh: A socio- economic and demographic picture. Man in India 87(3 & 4): 389–398.
Ramakrishnan P.S., 1992, Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development.UNESCO-MAB Series, Parthenon Publication, Paris.
Samarpitha A.,Vasudev N. & Suhasini K., 2016, Socio-economic characteristics of Rice farmers in the combined State of Andhra Pradesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 13(1): 1–9.
Sangwan V. & Deswal S., 2022, Paddy stubble management: a study on farmers’ opinions. Ecological Questions 33(2): 53–61.
Sankalpa J.K.S., Wijesuriya W., Ishani P.G.N. & Rathnayaka A.M.R.W.S.D., 2021, Smallholder rubber agroforestry farming in thenon-traditional areas of Sri Lanka: An application of assets-based livelihood capitalindicator approach. E3S Web Conference 305: 1–12.
Shaw P. & Panda S., 2018, Floristic elements, Socio-economic impacts and conservation status of east Kolkata wetlands – a Ramsar site. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 40(3–4): 126–133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ashim Das Astapati, Ashesh Kumar Das
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 580
Number of citations: 0