Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Ecological Questions

Agroecological characteristics of the effect of a mixture of probiotic preparations with concomitant formation water on soil microorganisms
  • Home
  • /
  • Agroecological characteristics of the effect of a mixture of probiotic preparations with concomitant formation water on soil microorganisms
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 34 No. 3 (2023) /
  4. Articles

Agroecological characteristics of the effect of a mixture of probiotic preparations with concomitant formation water on soil microorganisms

Authors

  • Pavlo Pysarenko https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-265X
  • Maryna Samojlik https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-265X
  • Maryna Galytska Poltava State Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-0515
  • Yuriy Tsova https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-3830
  • Maryna Pischalenko https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-8256

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2023.033

Keywords

soil, probiotic preparations, concomitant formation water, soil bacteria, soil-biological processes

Abstract

In the context of energy and environmental crisis, the search for new substances ensuring the formation of microbial cenosis with a rich composition of agronomically valuable groups of bacteria, the optimal level of humification, and the increase of organic matter in the soil will allow to substantiate innovative environmentally safe types of fertilizers and plant protection under specific soil and climatic conditions. Therefore, the aim of the research was to study the peculiarities of the formation and functioning of microbial cenosis of podzolic chernozem soil and the intensity of soil-biological processes upon application of a mixture of probiotic preparations and concomitant formation water in different concentrations. Different concentrations of concomitant formation water (СFW) and probiotic preparations were applied to the soil in the selected plots, and the soil microbial cenoses of farmland were evaluated in the spring and autumn periods on days 15, 30, and 60 after application of the mixtures. Soil without the application of any substances was considered a control variant. The most effective impact is observed on day 30 after application, there is an activation of microbiological processes on day 15, and a significant decrease is observed on day 60, although higher than the control due to the prolonged action of СFW. It was determined that the best variant of the experiment in both spring and autumn periods to improve the viability of soil microbial cenosis is the option of joint use of СFW at a concentration of 900 L ha-1 and probiotic Sviteco-Agrobiotic-01 diluted in a ratio of 1:10 (dose 100 L ha-1). In particular, the total number of all groups of bacteria in the soil increases with the use of probiotics diluted in a ratio of 1:10 (15-31% compared to control) and is the maximum when using a mixture of СFW at a dose of 900 L ha-1 and 10% probiotic (by 82-102% compared to control). Based on the analysis of the coefficients of mineralization-immobilization, oligotrophy, and pedotrophy, it was found that the application of СFW mixture and probiotic increases the soil nutrient content for different ecological and trophic groups of bacteria, reduces the rate of humus decomposition and creates favorable conditions for the development of soil bacteria.

References

Aktar W., Sengupta D. & Chowdhury A., 2009, Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdisciplinary Toxicology 2(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7

Aranda V. & Comino F., 2014, Soil organic matter quality in three mediterranean environments (a first barrier against desertification in Europe). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 14(3): 743–760. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162014005000060

Bogomazov S.V., Grishin G.E., Kochmin A.G., Tkachuk O.A. & Pavlikova E.V., 2016, Biological indicators and fertility of leached black soil depending on the elements of crop rotation biologization management and the use of resource-saving tillage systems. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 7(3): 847–852.

Bongiorno G., Bünemann E.K., Brussaard L., Mäder P., Oguejiofor C.U. & de Goede R.G.M., 2020, Soil management intensity shifts microbial catabolic profiles across a range of European long-term field experiments. Applied Soil Ecology 154: 103596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103596

Degaltseva Z.V., Govdya V.V. & Velichko K.A., 2021, Management of expenses for fertilizers and chemical plant protection products in the accounting and control system of agrarian formations. Journal of Water and Land Development 49: 229–234. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2021.137116

Fitzner M., Fricke A., Schreiner M. & Baldermann S., 2021, Utilization of regional natural brines for the indoor cultivation of Salicornia europaea. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(21): 12105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112105

Galytska M., Kulyk M., Rakhmetov D., Kurylo V. & Rozhko I., 2021, Effect of cultivation method of Panicum virgatum and soil organic matter content on the biomass yield. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 108(3): 251–258. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2021.108.032

He Q., Silliman B.R. & Cui B., 2017, Incorporating thresholds into understanding salinity tolerance: A study using salt-tolerant plants in salt marshes. Ecology and Evolution 7(16): 6326–6333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3209

Kulyk M., Galytskaya M., Plaksiienko I., Kocherg A. & Mishchenko O., 2020, Switchgrass and lupin as phytoremediation crops of contaminated soil. 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2020, 20(5.1): 779–786. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.1/s20.098

Kwiatkowska-Malina J., 2018, Qualitative and quantitative soil organic matter estimation for sustainable soil management. Journal of Soils and Sediments 18(8): 2801–2812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1891-1

Li X., Rui J., Mao Y., Yannarell A. & Mackie R., 2014, Dynamics of the bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of a maize cultivar. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 68: 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.017

Liuta V.A. & Kononov O.V., 2018, Workshop on Microbiology. Kyiv, Ukraine, 184 pp. (in Ukrainian).

Iutynska H.O., 2017, Microbial biotechnology for the implementation of the new global program for sustainable development of the Ukrainian agrosphere. Agroecological Journal 2: 149–155 (in Ukrainian).

Ma C., Xiao Y., Puig-Bargués J., Shukla M.K., Tang X., Hou P. & Li Y., 2020, Using phosphate fertilizer to reduce emitter clogging of drip fertigation systems with high salinity water. Journal of Environmental Management 263(1): 110366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110366

Margesin R. & Niklinska M.A., 2019, Editorial: Elevation gradients: Microbial indicators of climate change? Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 2405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02405

Mary B. & Recous S., 1994, Measurement of nitrogen mineralization and immobilization fluxes in soil as a means of predicting net mineralization. European Journal of Agronomy 3(4): 291–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(14)80157-3

Markina I., 2019, Organic farming: technology, marketing. Security of the XXI century: national fnd geopolitical aspects. Collective monograph. Prague. Nemoros s.r.o. Czech Republic, 404 pp. https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u295/2021_mono.pdf

Möhring N., Dalhaus T., Enjolras G. & Finger R., 2020, Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture. Agricultural Systems 184: 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102902

Nakano M.M. & Zuber P., 1998, Anaerobic growth of a “strict aerobe” (Bacillus subtilis). Annual Review of Microbiology 52: 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.165

Obire O. & Amusan F.O., 2003, The environmental impact of oilfield formation water on a freshwater stream in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 7(1): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v7i1.17167

Ovreås L., Jensen S., Daae F.L. & Torsvik V., 1998, Microbial community changes in a perturbed agricultural soil investigated by molecular and physiological approaches. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64(7): 2739–2742. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.7.2739-2742.1998

Pisarenko P.V, Samoylik M.S. & Korchagin O.P., 2019, Phytotoxic assessment of sewage treatment methods in disposal sites. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 341(1): 12002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012002

Primpas I. & Karydis M., 2011, Scaling the trophic index (TRIX) in oligotrophic marine environments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 178(1-4): 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1687-x

Pysarenko P.V., Samoilik M.S., Dychenko O.Yu., Tsova Yu.А., Bezsonova V.А. & Liskonog K.М., 2021a, Studying fungicidal properties of mineralized stratum water on millet areas. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy 1: 196–202. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.01.24

Pysarenko P., Samoilik M., Taranenko A., Tsova Y. & Sereda M., 2021b, Case study: Influence of probiotics-based products on phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi in agrocenosis. Agraarteadus 32(2): 303–306. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.21.41

Pysarenko P., Samojlik M., Galytska M., Tsova Y., Kalinichenko A. & Bąk M., 2022, Ecotoxicological assessment of mineralized stratum water as an environmentally friendly substitute for agrochemicals. Agronomy Research, 20(4): 785–792. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.22.045

Reva M., 2016, Mineralized stratum watein the Eastern oil and gas region of Ukraine as a source of danger or a valuable resource. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Geology (1): 81–85 (in Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKNU_geol_2016_1_14

Romero-Olivares A.L., Allison S.D. & Treseder K.K., 2017, Soil microbes and their response to experimental warming over time: A meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 107: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.026

Semiz G.D. & Suarez D.L., 2019, Impact of grafting, salinity and irrigation water composition on eggplant fruit yield and ion relations. Scientific Reports 9(1): 19373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55841-0

Shevnikov M., Milenko O., Lotysh I., Shevnikov D. & Shovkova O., 2022, The effect of cultivation conditions on the nitrogen fixation and seed yield of three Ukrainian varieties of soybean. Scientific Horizons 25(8): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.25(8).2022.17-27

Taranenko A., Kulyk M., Galytska M. & Taranenko S., 2019, Effect of cultivation technology on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) productivity in marginal lands in Ukraine. Acta Agrobotanica 72(3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1786

Taranenko A., Kulyk M., Galytska M., Taranenko S. & Rozhko I., 2021, Dynamics of soil organic matter in panicum virgatum sole crops and intercrops. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 108(3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2021.108.033

Titova V.I. & Kozlov A.V., 2012, Methods for assessing the functioning of the soil microbiocenosis involved in the transformation of organic matter. Nizhny Novgorod, 64. pp. (in Russian).

Tsentylo L.V., 2019, Enzymatic activity of chernozem typical depending on the main cultivation of soil and fertilizer. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics 30: 66–71. https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2019-1-8

Vandenberghe L.P. de S., Garcia L.M.B., Rodrigues C., Camara M.C., Pereira G.V. de M., Oliveira J. de & Soccol C.R., 2017, Potential applications of plant probiotic microorganisms in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Microbiology 3(3): 629–648. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.629

WRB, 2014, World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, 189 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf

Yong Z., Ji C. & Feng Z., 2020, A review on enzymatic degradation and its regulation mechanisms for organic wastes. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment 36(7): 842–853. https://doi.org/10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2019.0420

Zvyagintsev D.G. (ed.), 1991, Methods of soil microbiology and biochemistry, Moscow State University, 304 рp. (in Russian).

Downloads

  • pdf

Published

2023-03-21

How to Cite

1.
PYSARENKO, Pavlo, SAMOJLIK, Maryna, GALYTSKA, Maryna, TSOVA, Yuriy and PISCHALENKO, Maryna. Agroecological characteristics of the effect of a mixture of probiotic preparations with concomitant formation water on soil microorganisms. Ecological Questions. Online. 21 March 2023. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1-15. [Accessed 22 May 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EQ.2023.033.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Prof, Prof, Maryna Galytskaya, Prof, Ms

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 409
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

soil, probiotic preparations, concomitant formation water, soil bacteria, soil-biological processes
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop