Modern use of modified Sequencing Batch Reactor in wastewater Treatment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2022.033Keywords
sequencing batch reactor, pollution, treatment, nitrification, denitrification, biological wastewater treatmentAbstract
If wastes are not properly managed, it may seep into the earth and aquifers, polluting both the surface and the water table. For public health reasons, leachate is considered a major environmental hazard due of its poisonous and hardy components. Because of this, it must be collected and processed adequately before being released into nature. Currently, there is no single unit procedure for appropriate leachate treatment since traditional wastewater treatment techniques are unable to degrade harmful chemicals contained in the leachate to a suitable level. Consequently, there has been an increase in the study of various leachate treatment procedures in order to maximise operational versatility. Various strategies have been used to degrade the leachate based on its properties, discharge requirements, technological possibilities, regulatory restrictions, and cost concerns. Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treatment systems for landfill leachate were lauded for their operating flexibility, shock load resilience, and high biomass retention in the interest of long-term sustainability for the environment. Therefore, the current work objective is a deeper study of the features of SBR to identify prospects and unresolved problems in this process. The content analysis method of scientific publications from rating journals indexed in Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, Google Scholar on the totality of the keywords of this study in various combinations was applied; selection and synthesis of the main characteristics SBR to identify gaps in this area and prospects for future research. An in-depth analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of different leachate degrading processes is provided in this article. The role of integrated leachate treatment technologies with SBR was also highlighted. The effects of various materials, techniques, tactics, and configurations on leachate treatment were also explored in the paper. Critiqued SBR system environmental and operational factors were addressed. Readers of this work are expected to get a better understanding of SBR studies for leachate treatment and to use this information as a guide for their own research in this field. It uses the fill and draw activated sludge system with clarifier and intermittent aeration mode, where all the metabolic reactions and the separation of solid-liquid takes place in a unit tank through a timed control sequence in a non-steady state, variable capacity and suspended growth biological wastewater treatment system. The simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal are made possible by combining anaerobic and aerobic processes.
References
Abdulgader M., Yu Q.J., Zinatizadeh A.A., Williams P. & Rahimi Z., 2020, Performance and kinetics analysis of an aerobic sequencing batch flexible fibre biofilm reactor for milk processing wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Manage. 255: 109793. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109793
Al-Mamun A., Jafary T., Baawain M.S., Rahman S., Choudhury M.R., Tabatabaei M. & Lam S.S., 2020, Energy recovery and carbon/nitrogen removal from sewage and contaminated groundwater in a coupled hydrolytic-acidogenic sequencing batch reactor and denitrifying biocathode microbial fuel cell. Environ. Res. 183: 109273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109273
Baek G., Kim J. & Lee C., 2021, Effectiveness of electromagnetic in situ magnetite capture in anaerobic sequencing batch treatment of dairy effluent under electro-syntrophic conditions. Renew. Energy 179: 105–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.052
Barros A.R.M., Rollemberg S.L. de S., de Carvalho C. de A., Moura I.H.H., Firmino P.I.M. & dos Santos A.B., 2020, Effect of calcium addition on the formation and maintenance of aerobic granular sludge (AGS) in simultaneous fill/draw mode sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). J. Environ. Manage. 255: 109850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109850
Bhuvaneshwari S., Majeed F., Jose E. & Mohan A., 2022, Different treatment methodologies and reactors employed for dairy effluent treatment-A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering 46: 102622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102622
Bucci P., Coppotelli B., Morelli I., Zaritzky N. & Caravelli A., 2021, Heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification performance in a granular sequencing batch reactor supported by next generation sequencing. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 160: 105210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105210
Chen D., Li H., Xue X., Zhang L., Hou Y., Chen H., Zhang Y., Song Y., Zhao S. & Guo J., 2022, Enhanced simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification performance of aerobic granular sludge via tapered aeration in sequencing batch reactor for treating low strength and low COD/TN ratio municipal wastewater. Environ. Res. 209: 112743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112743
Chudoba J., Grau P., Ottova V., 1973, Control of activated ! sludge filamentous bulking — II. Selection of microorganisms by means of a selector. Water Res 7(10): 1398–406.
Ciggin A.S., Iravanian A., Doğruel S. & Orhon D., 2021, Co-metabolism of olive mill wastewater in sequencing batch reactor under aerobic conditions after Fenton-based oxidation. J. Water Process Eng. 43: 102277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102277
Ding J., Chen B., Zhang Y., Ye X., Li Y., Zhou D., Ding Y., Zhu W. & Zhang H., 2021, Effects of poly (1,4-butanediol succinate) carrier on the nitrogen removal performance and microbial community of sequencing batch reactors. J. Clean. Prod. 291: 125279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125279
Guo Q., Yin Q., Du J., Zuo J. & Wu G., 2022, New insights into the r/K selection theory achieved in methanogenic systems through continuous-flow and sequencing batch operational modes. Sci. Total Environ. 807: 150732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150732
Heidari M.R., Malakootian M., Boczkaj G., Sun X., Tao Y., Sonawane S.H. & Mehdizadeh H., 2021, Evaluation and start-up of an electro-Fenton-sequencing batch reactor for dairy wastewater treatment. Water Resour. Ind. 25: 100149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2021.100149
Hou Y., Zeng Q., Li H., Wu J., Xiang J., Huang H. & Shi S., 2022, Metagenomics-based interpretation of the impacts of silica nanoparticles exposure on phenol treatment performance in sequencing batch reactor system. Chem. Eng. J. 428: 132052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132052
Hu K., Sarrà M. & Caminal G., 2021, Comparison between two reactors using Trametes versicolor for agricultural wastewater treatment under non-sterile condition in sequencing batch mode. J. Environ. Manage. 293: 112859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112859
Jagaba A.H., Kutty S.R.M., Lawal I.M., Abubakar S., Hassan I., Zubairu I., Umaru I., Abdurrasheed A.S., Adam A.A., Ghaleb A.A.S., Almahbashi N.M.Y., Al-Dhawi B.N.S. & Noor A., 2021a, Sequencing batch reactor technology for landfill leachate treatment: A state-of-the-art review. J. Environ. Manage. 282: 111946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111946
Jagaba Ahmad Hussaini, Kutty S.R.M., Noor A., Birniwa A.H., Affam A.C., Lawal I.M., Kankia M.U. & Kilaco A.U., 2021b, A systematic literature review of biocarriers: Central elements for biofilm formation, organic and nutrients removal in sequencing batch biofilm reactor. J. Water Process Eng. 42: 102178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102178
Ji J., Peng L., Redina M.M., Gao T., Khan A., Liu P. & Li X., 2021, Perfluorooctane sulfonate decreases the performance of a sequencing batch reactor system and changes the sludge microbial community. Chemosphere 279: 130596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130596
Jones, W. L., Schroeder, E. D. & Wilderer P. A., 1990, Denitrification in a batch wastewater treatment system using sequestered organic substances. Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 62(3): 259–267. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25043830
Karadag D., Köroğlu O.E., Ozkaya B. & Cakmakci M., 2015, A review on anaerobic biofilm reactors for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem. 50: 262–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.11.005
Khalaf A.H., Ibrahim W.A., Fayed M. & Eloffy M.G., 2021, Comparison between the performance of activated sludge and sequence batch reactor systems for dairy wastewater treatment under different operating conditions. Alexandria Eng. J. 60: 1433–1445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.062
Khalil M. & Liu Y., 2021, Greywater biodegradability and biological treatment technologies: A critical review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 161: 105211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105211
Lee D.-J., Chen Y.-Y., Show K.-Y., Whiteley C.G. & Tay J.-H., 2010, Advances in aerobic granule formation and granule stability in the course of storage and reactor operation. Biotechnol. Adv. 28: 919–934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.007
Li D., Zhang S., Li S., Zeng H. & Zhang J., 2019, Aerobic granular sludge operation and nutrients removal mechanism in a novel configuration reactor combined sequencing batch reactor and continuous-flow reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 292: 122024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122024
Liu Y., Gayle A.A., Wilder-Smith A. & Rocklöv J., 2020, The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J. Travel Med. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa021
Maurya R., Zhu X., Valverde-Pérez B., Ravi Kiran B., General T., Sharma S., Kumar Sharma A., Thomsen M., Venkata Mohan S., Mohanty K. & Angelidaki I., 2022, Advances in microalgal research for valorization of industrial wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 343: 126128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126128
Miao L., Wang S., Li B., Cao T., Xue T. & Peng Y., 2015a, Advanced nitrogen removal via nitrite using stored polymers in a modified sequencing batch reactor treating landfill leachate. Bioresour. Technol. 192: 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.013
Miao L., Wang S., Li B., Cao T., Xue T. & Peng Y., 2015b, Advanced nitrogen removal via nitrite using stored polymers in a modified sequencing batch reactor treating landfill leachate. Bioresour. Technol. 192: 354–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.013
Nancharaiah Y.V & Kiran Kumar Reddy G., 2018, Aerobic granular sludge technology: Mechanisms of granulation and biotechnological applications. Bioresour. Technol. 247: 1128–1143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.131
National G. & Pillars H., 2015, Sequencing Batch Reactor Technology. IWA Publ. 1: 3–93.
Ni M., Pan Y., Zhang X., Wen L., Yang W., Chen Y., Huang Y. & Song Z., 2021, Effects of P/C ratios on the growth, phosphorus removal and phosphorus recovery of a novel strain of highly efficient PAO. Process Biochem. 111: 109–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2021.08.010
Patel K., Patel N., Vaghamshi N., Shah K., Duggirala S.M. & Dudhagara P., 2021, Trends and strategies in the effluent treatment of pulp and paper industries: A review highlighting reactor options. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2: 100077. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100077
Piotrowski R., Sawicki H. & Żuk K., 2021, Novel hierarchical nonlinear control algorithm to improve dissolved oxygen control in biological WWTP. J. Process Control 105: 78–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.07.009
Pochwatka P., Kowalczyk-Juśko A., Sołowiej P., Wawrzyniak A. & Dach J., 2020, Biogas plant exploitation in a middle-sized dairy farm in Poland: Energetic and economic aspects. Energies 13(22): 6058.
Sakalova H., Malovanyy M., Vasylinycz T., Palamarchuk O., Semchuk J., 2019, Treatment of effluents from ions of heavy metals as display of environmentally responsible activity of modern businessman. Journal of Ecological Engineering: 20(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/102841
Saleh M.M.A. & Mahmood U.F., 2005, Modified sequential batch reactor (MSBR) a new process of wastewater treatment. 9th Int. Water Technol. Conf., p. 105–113.
Singh V., Ormeci B., Mishra S. & Hussain A., 2022, Simultaneous partial Nitrification, ANAMMOX and denitrification (SNAD) – A review of critical operating parameters and reactor configurations. Chem. Eng. J. 433: 133677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133677
Su J.J., Huang J.F., Wang Y.L. & Hong Y.Y., 2018, Treatment of duck house wastewater by a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor system for sustainable duck production. Poult. Sci. 97: 3870–3877. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey251
Vambol S., Vambol V., Suchikova Y. & Deyneko N., 2017, Analysis of the ways to provide ecological safety for the products of nanotechnologies throughout their life cycle, Eastern European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 1/10(85): 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.85847.
Voytovych I., Malovanyy M., Zhuk V. & Mukha O., 2020, Facilities and problems of processing organic wastes by family-type biogas plants in Ukraine. Journal of Water and Land Development 45(IV–VI): 185–189. https://doi.org/ 10.24425/jwld.2020.133493
Wang J., Zhou J., Wang Y., Wen Y., He L. & He Q., 2020, Efficient nitrogen removal in a modified sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating hypersaline mustard tuber wastewater: The potential multiple pathways and key microorganisms. Water Res. 177: 115734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115734
Wang L., Gu W., Liu Y., Liang P., Zhang X. & Huang X., 2022, Challenges, solutions and prospects of mainstream anammox-based process for municipal wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 820: 153351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153351
Wang M., Keeley R., Zalivina N., Halfhide T., Scott K., Zhang Q., van der Steen P. & Ergas S.J., 2018, Advances in algal-prokaryotic wastewater treatment: A review of nitrogen transformations, reactor configurations and molecular tools. J. Environ. Manage. 217: 845–857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.021
Zhang M., Wang X., Zhang D., Zhao G., Zhou B., Wang D., Wu Z., Yan C., Liang J. & Zhou L., 2022, Food waste hydrolysate as a carbon source to improve nitrogen removal performance of high ammonium and high salt wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 349: 126855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126855
Zhang Y., Meng C., He Y., Wang X. & Xue G., 2021, Influence of cell lysis by Fenton oxidation on cryptic growth in sequencing batch reactor (SBR): Implication of reducing sludge source discharge. Sci. Total Environ. 789: 148042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148042
Zhao J., Yuan Q., Sun Y., Zhang J., Zhang D. & Bian R., 2021, Effect of fluoxetine on enhanced biological phosphorus removal using a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 320: 124396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124396
Zheng Z., Li J. & Wang C., 2021, Rapid cultivation of the aerobic granules for simultaneous phenol degradation and ammonium oxidation in a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 325: 124414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124414
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 845
Number of citations: 0
