Carla Schmitta krytyka liberalnego uniwersalizmu na przykładzie instytucji wojny sprawiedliwej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2017.014Schlagworte:
Carl Schmitt, just war, partisan theory, politcal theology, the politicalAbstract
As Reinhard Mehring stated, the one thing which bonds all the work of Carl Schmitt is his reluctance to liberalism. For Schmitt, liberalism is a political philosophy which destroys understanding of the notion of the political. The best demonstration of this destruction is schmittian interpretation of the institution of just war and the shape which it took in his contemporary times. This article is an attempt to reconstruct Schmitt’s interpretation, as well as to indicate this item of his work, which can be interpretated as a restoration of the notion of the political – schmittian theory of partisan fights.
Literaturhinweise
Balakrishnan G., The Enemy. An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt, London 2000.
Bendersky J. E., Schmitt’s diaries, w: The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, red. O. Simons, J. Meierhenrich, Oxford 2016.
Bull H., The Grotian Conception of International Society, w: „Diplomatic Investigations” red. H. Butterfield, M. Wight, London 1966.
Chandler D., The Revival of Carl Schmitt in International Relations: The Last Refuge of Critical Theorists?, „Millennium: Journal of International Studies”, vol.37 No.1.
Colombo A., The «realist institutionalism» of Carl Schmitt, w: The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt, red. L. Odysseos, F. Petito, New York 2007.
Gasché R., The partisan and the philosopher, „CR: The New Centennial Review” 4/2004.
Grzebyk P., Idea wojny sprawiedliwej, „Forum Prawnicze” 11/2010.
Kochi T., The Partisan. Carl Schmitt and Terrorism, „Law Critique” (2006) 17.
McMahan J., The Ethics of Killing in War, „Ethics” 114 (4).
Müller J.-W., An «Irregularity that cannot be regulated»: Carl Schmitt and the War on Terror, „Notizie di Politeia: Rivista di Etica e Scelte Pubbliche”, vol. 22, (2006).
Pankakoski T., Containment and intensification in political war: Carl Schmitt and the Clausewitzian heritage, „History of European Ideas” 43:6.
Parsons G., The Dualism of Modern Just War Theory, „Philosophia” (2017).
Schmitt C., Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, przeł. M. A. Cichocki, Warszawa 2012.
Schmitt C., The “Nomos” of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, tłum. G. L. Ulmen, New York 2003.
Schmitt C., Wojna sprawiedliwa, przeł. W. Kunicki, http://www.tomaszgabis.pl/2014/12/07/carl-schmitt-wojna-sprawiedliwa/.
Schmitt C., Teoria partyzanta. Uwagi na marginesie «Pojęcia polityczności», przeł. B. Cymbrowski, Warszawa 2017.
Slomp G., Carl Schmitt on friendship. Polemics and diagnostics, „Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy”, 10 (2) 2007.
Strathausen C., Myth or Knowledge? Reading Carl Schmitt’s «Hamlet or Hecuba», „Télos” 2010 (153).
Sussman N., Can just war theory delegitimate terrorism?, „European Journal of Political Theory” 12 (4).
Teschke B. G., Fatal attraction: a critique of Carl Schmitt's international political and legal theory, „International Theory”, 3 (2) 2011.
Quinlan M., Guthrie C., The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare, London 2007.
Yurdusev A. N., Thomas Hobbes and international relations: from realism to rationalism, „Australian Journal of International Affairs” 2006 (60).
Walzer M., Just and Unjust Wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations, New York 2000.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 812
Number of citations: 0
