Thomas Aquinas, the Beginning of Human Life and the Science of the Soul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2015.005Abstrakt
The research question of the paper is: Is a view – prevalent within a modern Catholic Church – that human life begins at the moment of conception coherent with the Catholic teachings on the soul and man? The thesis of the paper is the following assertion: A modern view that human life begins at the moment of conception is incoherent with the Catholic teachings on the soul and man. A view that is coherent with these teachings is a view that human life begins at some time after conception (delayed hominization account). The research method employed in the paper is the method of reflective equilibrium. The main conclusion of the paper is a call for the revival of the delayed hominization account both in philosophy and Catholic teachings.Reference
Arras J.D. (2007). The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. B. Steinbock (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Aquinas (edition 1947). Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province.
Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Daniels N. (2011). Reflective Equilibrium. [in:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium/; [accessed 09.07.2014].
Daniels N. (1979). Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. „The Journal of Philosophy” 76 (5).
Dominiak Ł. (2012). Metoda równowagi refleksyjnej (reflective equilibrium) w filozofii polityki. „Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 36.
Dworkin R. (2013). Taking Rights Seriously. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Finnis J. (2004). Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haslett D.W. (1987). What Is Wrong With Reflective Equilibria?. „Philosophical Quarterly” 37/148.
Locke J. (1997). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Penguin Books.
McMahan J. (2002). The Ethics of Killing. Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parfit D. (1987). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls J. (1951). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. „The Philosophical Review” 60 (2).
Rawls J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stahování
Publikováno
Jak citovat
Číslo
Sekce
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 809
Number of citations: 0
