Is Ronald Dworkin a pragmatist?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2014.015Resumen
-Citas
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977).
Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985).
Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1986).
Ronald Dworkin, “Pragmatism, Right Answers, and True Banality,” in Pragmatism in Law & Society, ed. Michael Brint and William Weaver (Boulder: Westview, 1991), 359–88, 360.
Marshall Cohen, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984).
Scott Hershovitz, ed., Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Genaro R. Carrio, “Professor Dworkin‟s Views on Legal Positivism,” Indiana Law Journal 55 (1979): 209–46.
Brian Leiter, “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.
Scott J. Shapiro, “The „Hart-Dworkin‟ Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed,” in Ronald Dworkin, ed. Arthur Ripstein (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 22–55.
H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1994).
Étienne Picard, “Common Law,” ed. Denis Alland and Stéphane Rials, Dictionnaire de la culture juridique (Paris: Lamy, Presses universitaires de France, 2003) at 242.
Jean-Pierre Cometti, Qu’est-ce que le pragmatisme? (Paris: Gallimard, 2010), 43.
Thomas C. Grey, “Hear the Other Side: Wallace Stevens and Pragmatist Legal Theory,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989): 1569–95, 1571-1572.
Margaret Radin, “The Pragmatist and the Feminist,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1990): 1699–1726 at 1722.
Richard A. Posner, “What Has Pragmatism to Offer Law,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989): 1653–70 at 1654.
Richard Rorty, “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1990): 1811–19 at 1811-1813.
Robert Justin Lipkin, “Dworkin‟s Constitutional Coherentism,” in Constitutional Revolutions: Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism (Durham (N.C.): Duke University Press, 2000), 77–117, 91.
Pierce, Charles S., “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Popular Science Monthly 12 (1878): 286-302, 293.
Claudine Tiercelin, C.S. Peirce et le pragmatisme (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1993) 5.
Jean-Pierre Cometti, Qu’est-ce que le pragmatisme? (Paris: Gallimard, 2010).
Jean-Rodrigue-Élisée Eyene Mba and Irma Julienne Anque Medoux, Richard Rorty : La fin de la métaphysique et la pragmatique de la science (Paris: L‟Harmattan, 2007) at 79 ff.
Véronique Champeil-Desplats, “Production et Sens Des Principes : Relecture Analytique,” Diritto E Questioni Pubbliche 11 (2011): 39–57.
Eyene Mba and Anque Medoux, Richard Rorty : La fin de la métaphysique et la pragmatique de la science at 86 ff.
Luc B. Tremblay, “L‟interprétation téléologique des droits constitutionnels,” Revue juridique Thémis 29 (1995): 459–526, 487.
Hilary Putnam, Words and Life (Cambridge, Masschusetts: Harvard University Press, 1994) at 152.
Michel Troper, “Présentation,” Droit et Société 1 (1985): 29–33, 32.
E. W. Thomas, The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Michael S. Moore, “Metaphysics, Epistemology and Legal Theory,” Southern California Law Review 60 (1986): 453–506, 499.
Michel Troper, “Les juges pris au sérieux ou la théorie du droit selon Dworkin,” Droit et Société 2 (1986): 53–70, 56.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 490
Number of citations: 0
