Ronald Dworkin’s Criticism of Pragmatism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2014.002Abstrakt
-Bibliografia
Marshall Cohen, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984).
Scott Hershovitz, ed., Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977).
Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985).
Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1986).
Ronald Dworkin, “Pragmatism, Right Answers, and True Banality,” in Pragmatism in Law & Society, ed. Michael Brint and William Weaver (Boulder: Westview, 1991), 359–88 at 368.
Genaro R. Carrio, “Professor Dworkin’s Views on Legal Positivism,” Indiana Law Journal 55 (1979): 209–46.
Brian Leiter, “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.
Scott J. Shapiro, “The ‘Hart-Dworkin’ Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed,” in Ronald Dworkin, ed. Arthur Ripstein (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 22–55.
Étienne Picard, “Common Law,” ed. Denis Alland and Stéphane Rials, Dictionnaire de la culture juridique (Paris: Lamy, Presses universitaires de France, 2003) at 242.
Jean-Pierre Cometti, Qu’est-ce que le pragmatisme? (Paris: Gallimard, 2010).
Thomas C. Grey, “Hear the Other Side: Wallace Stevens and Pragmatist Legal Theory,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989): 1569–95 at 1571–1572.
Pierce, Charles S., “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Popular Science Monthly 12 (1878): 286–302 at 293.
Claudine Tiercelin, C.S. Peirce et le pragmatisme (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1993) at 5.
Thomas C. Grey, “Holmes and Legal Pragmatism,” Stanford Law Review 41 (1989): 787–870 at 814.
Richard Rorty, “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1990): 1811–19 at 1813.
Richard A. Posner, “What Has Pragmatism to Offer Law,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1989).
Richard A. Posner, “Pragmatic Adjudication,” Cardozo Law Review 18 (1996): 1–20 at 5 ff.
Jean-Rodrigue-Élisée Eyene Mba and Irma Julienne Anque Medoux, Richard Rorty : La fi n de la métaphysique et la pragmatique de la science (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2007) at 79 ff.
Véronique Champeil-Desplats, “Production et Sens Des Principes : Relecture Analytique,” Diritto E Questioni Pubbliche 11 (2011): 39–57 at 40.
Eyene Mba and Anque Medoux, Richard Rorty : La fi n de la métaphysique et la pragmatique de la science at 86 ff.
Luc B. Tremblay, “L’interprétation téléologique des droits constitutionnels,” Revue juridique Thémis 29 (1995): 459–526 at 487.
Hilary Putnam, Words and Life (Cambridge, Masschusetts: Harvard University Press, 1994) at 152.
Julie Allard, Dworkin et Kant : Réfl exions Sur Le Jugement (Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2001).
Thom Brooks, “Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory,” Georgia State University Law Review 23 (2006): 513–60.
Richard Nordahl, “Rousseau in Dworkin: Judicial Rulings as Expressions of the General Will,” Legal Theory 3 (1997): 317–46.
Robert Justin Lipkin, “Dworkin’s Constitutional Coherentism,” in Constitutional Revolutions: Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism (Durham (N.C.): Duke University Press, 2000), 77–117 at 91.
Michel Troper, “Les juges pris au sérieux ou la théorie du droit selon Dworkin,” Droit et Société 2 (1986): 53–70 at 63.
Michael Sullivan, Legal Pragmatism: Community, Rights, and Democracy (Bloomington (Ind.): Indiana University Press, 2007) at 32.
Margaret Radin, “The Pragmatist and the Feminist,” Southern California Law Review 63 (1990): 1699–1726 at 1722.
Steven D. Smith, “The Pursuit of Pragmatism,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1990).
William James, Pragmatism (New York: Dover Publications, 1995) at 84 (originally published: London; New York : Longmans Green, 1907).
John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry (University Park (Pa.): Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960) at 150.
Daniel A. Farber, “Legal Pragmatism and the Constitution,” Minnesota Law Review 72 (1987): 1331–78 at 1344.
Robin L. West, “In the Interest of the Governed: A Utilitarian Justifi cation for Substantive Judicial Review,” Georgia Law Review 18 (1984): 469–528.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 913
Liczba cytowań: 0
