Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Forthcoming
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • Ogłoszenia
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Przesyłanie tekstów
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type and Corporate Sustainability Reporting of Non-Financial Firms in Nigeria
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type and Corporate Sustainability Reporting of Non-Financial Firms in Nigeria
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Tom 13 Nr 1 (2024) /
  4. Artykuły

Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type and Corporate Sustainability Reporting of Non-Financial Firms in Nigeria

Autor

  • Muhammed Kamaldeen Usman Kwara State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-840X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2024.004

Słowa kluczowe

Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type (Big Four), Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Abstrakt

In spite of the detrimental consequences, such as pollution and other environmental risks arising from corporate activities, there has been a noticeable lack of transparency in disclosing social, environmental, and economic information. In light of this, the research aims to present empirical evidence regarding the impact of sustainability committees and the type of audit firm on the reporting of corporate sustainability information by companies. The study utilized an Ex-post facto research design, considering a population of one hundred and fifteen (115) listed non-financial firms. Ninety-two (92) companies were selected as the sample. Both descriptive and inferential (Panel Corrected Standard Error) estimation techniques were employed to analyze data collected from the annual reports and accounts of the sampled listed manufacturing companies over a seven-year period (2016-2022). The findings revealed that the presence of a sustainability committee and audit type significantly predict corporate sustainability reporting among listed non-financial firms at a 5% level of significance. In conclusion, the study determined that sustainability committees and audit types play a crucial and meaningful role in shaping corporate sustainability reporting practices among listed non-financial firms in Nigeria. As a result, the study recommends that listed companies should establish sustainability committees to proactively address sustainability issues and enhance disclosure. Additionally, non-Big Four audit firms are encouraged to enhance their services by providing their staff with up-to-date audit skills.

Bibliografia

Abdul Latif, R., Taufil Mohd, K.N., Kamardin, H., & Mohd Ariff, A.H. (2023). Determinants of sustainability disclosure quality among plantation companies in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(4), 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043799.

Abedin, S.H., Subha, S., Anwar, M., Kabir, M.N., Tahat, Y.A., & Hossain, M. (2023). Environmental performance and corporate governance: evidence from Japan. Sustainability,15(4), 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043273.

Aburaya, R. (2012). The relationship between corporate governance and environmental disclosure: UK evidence. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3456/ (accessed: 27.03.2012).

Aifuwa, H.O., Usman, M.K., Subair, M.L., Philip, G.T., & Hussien, K. (2022). Board Ethnicity and Sustainability Reporting. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 11(1), 9–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.001.

Alkhazalih, Q., Shahbudin, A., & Ghazali, A. (2022). The relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and CSR disclosure: evidence from Jordanian’s listed firms. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(4), 4768-4768. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v12i4.20499.

Amos, G.J. (2023). Corporate social and environmental reporting in the mining sector: seeking pragmatic and moral forms of legitimacy? Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 14(3), 548-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2021-0152.

Chandula, A.M.T., Dissanayake, H., & Anuradha, I. (2023). Role of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility: evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4(1), 24-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.53378/352971.

Chen, T., Dong, H., & Lin, C. (2020). Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.007.

Coscia, M. (2022). Board gender diversity and family firms’ corporate environmental responsibility: does" critical mass" matter? Corporate Governance and Research & Development Studies, 2, 137-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/cgrds2-2022oa15066.

Danvila del Valle, I., Díez Esteban, J. M., & López de Foronda Pérez, O. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability committee inside the board. European Journal of International Management, 13(2), 159-175.

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-36.

Eccles, R.G., Herz, R.H., Keegan, E.M., & Philips, D.M.H. (2001). The value reporting revolution: Moving beyond the earnings game. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, Ch.C.Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73, 131-143. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.08.008.

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston (MA), USA.

Geerts, M., Dooms, M., & Stas, L. (2021). Determinants of sustainability reporting in the present institutional context: the case of port managing bodies. Sustainability, 13(6), 3148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063148.

Githaiga, P.N. (2023). Sustainability reporting, board gender diversity and earnings management: Evidence from East Africa community. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 4(2), 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-09-2022-0099.

Githaiga, P.N., & Kosgei, J.K. (2023), Board characteristics and sustainability reporting: a case of listed firms in East Africa. Corporate Governance, 23(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2021-0449.

Guthrie, J., Cuganesan, S., & Ward, L. (2007). Extended Performance Reporting: Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital Management. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.22164/isea.v1i1.4.

Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2006) Corporate Sustainability Reporting. An Overview. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. (eds) Sustainability Accounting and Reporting., vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_13.

Kabara, A.S., Abdullah, D.F., Khatib, S.F., Bazhair, A.H., & Al Amosh, H. (2023). Moderating Role of Governance Regulatory Compliance on Board Diversity and Voluntary Disclosure of Non-Financial Firms in a Developing Country. Sustainability, 15(5), 4527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054527.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Mahmood, M., & Orazalin, N. (2017). Green Governance and Sustainability Reporting in Kazakhstan’s Oil, Gas, and Mining Sector: Evidence from a Former USSR Emerging Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.203.

Ofoegbu, G.N., Odoemelam, N., & Okafor, R.G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1551510. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1551510.

Orazalin, N., & Mahmood, M. (2019). Determinants of GRI-based sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 140-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2018-0137.

Park, H.M. (2008). Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS. Technical Working Paper. The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, Indiana University.

Talbot, D., Raineri, N., & Daou, A. (2021). Implementation of sustainability management tools: The contribution of awareness, external pressures, and stakeholder consultation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 71-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.2033.

Usman, M.K. (2019). Determinants of Corporate Environmental Disclosures of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. ProQuest Publications.

Uwuigbe, U., Teddy, O., Uwuigbe, O.R., Emmanuel, O., Asiriuwa, O., Eyitomi, G.A., & Taiwo, O.S. (2018). Sustainability reporting and firm performance: A bi-directional approach. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 1-16.

Welbeck, E., Owusu, G., Bekoe, R., & Kusi, J. (2017). Determinants of environmental disclosures of listed firms in Ghana. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2(11). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0023-y.

Yahaya, K.A., Bamigbade, D., & Ajiboye, O.G. (2022). The effect of corporate governance on environmental disclosure by listed Nigerian consumer goods firms. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 11(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.14710/jab.v11i1.41599.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Pobrania

  • PDF (English)

Opublikowane

2024-06-07

Jak cytować

1.
MUHAMMED KAMALDEEN USMAN. Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type and Corporate Sustainability Reporting of Non-Financial Firms in Nigeria. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting [online]. 7 czerwiec 2024, T. 13, nr 1, s. 63–80. [udostępniono 3.7.2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2024.004.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Tom 13 Nr 1 (2024)

Dział

Artykuły

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 327
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

Sustainability Committee, Audit Firm Type (Big Four), Corporate Sustainability Reporting

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa