LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR GRANGER CASUALITY BETWEEN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2020.006Słowa kluczowe
India, economic growth, foreign direct investment & causalityAbstrakt
The present study tries to understand the association among Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Economic growth in India. This paper applies the causality test of Granger (1969) based on the VECM and non-linear causality test of Dike and Panchenko over the period 1993-2016. This study gives a proof about the continuation of a long-run equilibrium association between FDI and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) or Economic Growth for the period being investigated. Unidirectional causality runs from FDI to GDP in the long run. The apparent non-linear causality running from FDI to GDP means that FDI is a policy instrument in stimulating Indian economic growth and provides support for the bi-directional non-linear causal connection between FDI and economic growth with 1, 2 and 4 lags. There has been no definitive investigation as of recently to find “linear and non-linear” Granger causality between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in India” and this study goes a stage advancing and present exact models that can be used to find the association among Foreign Direct Investment and economic growth.Bibliografia
Adams, S., & Klobodu, E.K.M. (2017). Capital flows and the distribution of income in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 55, 169-178.
Agrawal, G., & Khan, M.A. (2011). Impact of FDI on GDP: A comparative study of China and India. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 71.
Bailliu, J. N. (2000). Private capital flows, financial development, and economic growth in developing countries. Ottawa: Bank of Canada.
Belloumi, M. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems, 38(2), 269-287.
Chakraborty, C., & Basu, P. (2002). Foreign direct investment and growth in India: A cointegration approach. Applied Economics, 34(9), 1061-1073.
Dickey, D.A., & Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
Diks, C., & Panchenko, V. (2006). A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30(10), 1647-1669.
Duasa, J. (2007). Malaysian foreign direct investment and growth: Does stability matter. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 28(2), 83-98.
Dubé, J. P., Hitsch, G.J., & Rossi, P.E. (2009). Do switching costs make markets less competitive? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 435-445.
Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Fedderke, W., & Romm, T. (2006). Growth impact and determinants of foreign direct investment into South Africa, 1956–2003. Economic Modelling, 23(5), 738-760.
Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(1969), 424- -438.
Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic Econometrics: International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall International.
Hansen, H., Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2009). Enterprise growth and survival in Vietnam: Does government support matter? The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1048-1069.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H.S. (1988). Estimating vector auto regressions with panel data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1371-1395.
Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472.
Kakar, Z., & Khilji, B. (2011). Impact of FDI and trade openness on economic growth: A comparative study of Pakistan and Malaysia. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 11(564), 53-58.
Karagianni, S. (2012). Tax burden distribution and GDP growth: Non-linear causality considerations in the USA. International Review of Economics & Finance, 21(1), 186-194.
Kinda, T. (2010). Investment climate and FDI in developing countries: firm-level evidence. World development, 38(4), 498-513.
Kumar, N., & Pradhan, J.P. (2002). FDI, externalities and growth in developing countries: some empirical explorations and implications for WTO negotiations on investment. RIS Discussion Paper, (27).
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2005). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: An increasingly endogenous relationship. World Development, 33(3), 393-407.
Ludosean, B.M. (2012). A VAR analysis of the connection between FDI and economic growth in Romania. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 19(575), 115-130.
Lütkepohl, H. (1982). Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2-3), 367-378.
Magnus, F.J., & Fosu, O.A.E. (2011). On the Predictability of Inflation Rate in Ghana: A Box-Jenkins Approach. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1).
Nair-Reichert, U., & Weinhold, D. (2001). Causality tests for cross-country panels: A new look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2, 153-171.
Ndiaye, G., & Xu, H. (2016). Impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth in WAEMU from 1990 to 2012. International Journal of Financial Research, 7(4), 33-43.
Nguyen, H., Tham, J., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. (2019). Enhancing the capacity of tax authorities and its impact on transfer pricing activities of FDI en-terprises in Ha Noi, Ho Chi Minh, Dong Nai, and Binh Duong province of Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9(8), 1299-1310.
Popescu, G.H. (2014). FDI and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 6(11), 8149-8163.
Ramírez, M. (2000). Foreign direct investment in Mexico: A cointegration analysis. The Journal of Development Studies, 37, 138-162.
Ramirez, M.D. (2006). Economic and institutional determinants of foreign direct investment in Chile: A time-series analysis, 1960-2001. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(3), 459-474.
Sen, R. (2013). What do empirical studies say about economic growth and job creation in developing countries? Overseas Development Institute, 1.
Sengupta, P., & Puri, R. (2018). Exploration of relationship between FDI and GDP: A comparison between India and its neighbouring countries. Global Business Review (2018): 0972150918760026.
Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
Sothan, S. (2017). Causality between foreign direct investment and economic growth for Cambodia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1277.
Tan, B.W., & Tang, C.F. (2016). Examining the causal linkages among domestic investment, FDI, trade, interest rate and economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 214-220.
Tomi, S., & D’Estaing, D.G. (2015). Foreign direct investment, economic growth and structural transformation: The case of West African Economies and Monetary Union Countries.
UNCTAD (2000). World Investment Report 2000. Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development, https://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2000_en.pdf.
Vogiatzoglou, K., & Nguyen, P.N.T. (2016). Economic openness and economic growth: A cointegration analysis for ASEAN-5 countries. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 13(2), 10-20.
World Bank (2019). https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx? (accessed: 25.06.2019).
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Statystyki
Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 961
Liczba cytowań: 0
