Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do stopki
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Strona domowa
  • Forthcoming
  • Aktualny numer
  • Archiwum
  • PUBLICATION ETHICS
  • Przesyłanie tekstów
  • Ogłoszenia
  • O czasopiśmie
    • O czasopiśmie
    • Zespół redakcyjny
    • Polityka prywatności
    • Kontakt
  • Zarejestruj
  • Zaloguj
  • Język:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets
  • Strona domowa
  • /
  • Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets
  1. Strona domowa /
  2. Archiwum /
  3. Tom 15 Nr 2 (2026): Forthcoming /
  4. Artykuły

Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets

Autor

  • Changjie Hu Niagara University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-2763
  • Zhu Chen Southwestern University of Finance and Economics https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3961-400X
  • Ting Cao MacEwan University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-7742

Słowa kluczowe

credit unions, tangibility, land and buildings, fixed assets, foreclosed assets, risk, growth

Abstrakt

This study examines how tangible non-loan assets relate to risk, balance sheet resilience, and growth in U.S. credit unions. Using NCUA call report data, the analysis measures total tangibility and decomposes it into planned tangibility, captured by premises and other fixed assets, and shock-driven tangibility, captured by foreclosed and repossessed assets obtained through workout and recovery. This decomposition separates slower moving operating investment from distress-related collateral holdings that become embedded on the non-loan side of the balance sheet. In fixed-effects panel regressions with lagged explanatory variables, controls, and high-dimensional fixed effects, higher tangibility is associated with thinner capital buffers and weaker economic solvency, alongside higher delinquency and net charge-offs, with materially stronger associations for the shock-driven component. These links intensify in crisis periods and vary with institutional scale and capital buffers, with the adverse associations generally stronger during stress periods and weaker at larger and better-capitalized credit unions. Moreover, planned tangibility is positively related to loan and member growth, but negatively related to asset growth, while shock-driven tangibility is strongly negative across growth outcomes. Overall, the evidence suggests that non-loan asset composition provides incremental information about both strategic capacity and distress dynamics and the trade-off between growth and resilience in a sector where retained earnings are central to resilience.

Bibliografia

Bauer, K. (2008). Detecting abnormal credit union performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.04.022.

Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 339-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009.

Berger, A.N., & Bouwman, C.H.S. (2013). How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 146-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.008.

Berger, A.N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), 849-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4.

Berger, A.N., & Mester, L.J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00010-1.

Berger, A.N., Leusner, J.H., & Mingo, J.J. (1997). The efficiency of bank branches. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00035-4.

Boda, M. (2017). The impact of the 2007–2009 financial crisis on risk management in credit institutions. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.014.

Bushman, R.M., & Williams, C.D. (2012). Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks' risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.04.002.

Bushman, R.M., & Williams, C.D. (2015). Delayed expected loss recognition and the risk profile of banks. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 511-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12079.

Calem, P.S., & Rob, R. (1999). The impact of capital-based regulation on bank risk-taking: A dynamic model. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(4), 317-352. https://doi.org/10.1006/JFIN.1999.0276.

El Fadil, J., & Hessou, H. (2024). Performance and assets and liabilities management in the US credit union. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 14(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1416.

Foos, D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). Loan growth and riskiness of banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.007.

Goddard, J.A., McKillop, D., & Wilson, J.O.S. (2014). US credit unions: Survival, consolidation and growth. Economic Inquiry, 52(1), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12032.

Goddard, J., McKillop, D., & Wilson, J.O. (2008). The diversification and financial performance of US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1836-1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.015.

Gomez-Biscarri, J., López-Espinosa, G., & Mesa-Toro, A. (2021). The risk implications of the business loan activity in credit unions. Journal of Financial Stability, 56, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100932.

Harding, J.P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V.W. (2012). The foreclosure discount: Myth or reality?. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.09.005.

Hirtle, B.J. (2007). The impact of network size on bank branch performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12), 3782-3805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.01.020.

Hu, C., Chen, Z., & Cao, T. (2026). Mission Drift or Strategic Expansion? Non-Core Lending, Risk, and Capital in US Credit Unions. Risks, 14(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14020032.

Jacques, K., & Nigro, P. (1997). Risk-based capital, portfolio risk, and bank capital: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Economics and Business, 49(6), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00038-6.

McKillop, D.G., & Wilson, J.O.S. (2011). Credit unions: A theoretical and empirical overview. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 20(3), 79-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0416.2011.00166.x.

Peek, J., & Rosengren, E.S. (1997). The international transmission of financial shocks: The case of Japan. American Economic Review, 87(4), 495-505.

Ramcharan, R. (2020). Banks’ balance sheets and liquidation values: Evidence from real estate collateral. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(2), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz056.

Shrieves, R.E., & Dahl, D. (1992). The relationship between risk and capital in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16(2), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(92)90024-T.

Smith, D.J., Cargill, T.F., & Meyer, R.A. (1981). An economic theory of a credit union. The Journal of Finance, 36(2), 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00470.x.

Van Rijn, J. (2022). The cooperative identity at US credit unions. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 10(1), 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100152.

Wheelock, D.C., & Wilson, P.W. (2011). Are credit unions too small? Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1343-1359. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00121.

Wheelock, D.C., & Wilson, P.W. (2013). The evolution of cost-productivity and efficiency among US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.003.

Wilcox, J.A. (2005). Economies of scale and continuing consolidation of credit unions. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter, 2005-29.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Opublikowane

2026-06-14

Jak cytować

1.
HU, Changjie, CHEN, Zhu & CAO, Ting. Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting [online]. 14 czerwiec 2026, T. 15, nr 2. [udostępniono 15.6.2026].
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polski)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Pobierz cytowania
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numer

Tom 15 Nr 2 (2026): Forthcoming

Dział

Artykuły

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Statystyki

Liczba wyświetleń i pobrań: 0
Liczba cytowań: 0

Wyszukiwanie

Wyszukiwanie

Przeglądaj

  • Indeks autorów
  • Lista archiwalnych numerów

Użytkownik

Użytkownik

Aktualny numer

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informacje

  • dla czytelników
  • dla autorów
  • dla bibliotekarzy

Newsletter

Zapisz się Wypisz się

Język / Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tagi

Szukaj przy pomocy tagu:

credit unions, tangibility, land and buildings, fixed assets, foreclosed assets, risk, growth

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

W górę

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partnerzy platformy czasopism

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu Deklaracja dostępności Sklep wydawnictwa