MAX WEBER’S RATIONALITY IN ACCOUNTING RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.024Parole chiave
Max Weber, rationality, accounting, social studies, research, reviewAbstract
Max Weber (1864–1920), a German political economist, sociologist and historian has been influencing the critical accounting research significantly since 20th century. This paper aims to investigate the influence of Weber’s ‘rationality’ concept in accounting research through the identification of research platforms, trends and major themes and findings. This study adopts the qualitative research methods. A number of papers from 1984 to 2021 have been analyzed to reach the aim. Call of modernization and human inheritance with tradition force men to act in a rational and calculative way which are the premise of Weber’s rationality. Through the three specific things – calculability, methodological behavior and reflexivity Weber defined rationality and its process in the society. The study finds that Weber’s rationality has been used to understand the society and its reflection in the implementation of accounting mechanisms. Various disciplines of accounting (financial accounting, management accounting and auditing) as well as implementation of various tools of accounting have been investigated under the concept of rationality. Both the public and private enterprises have been investigated under the concept of rationality. It is expected that the study will contribute to understand the application of Weber’s concept in accounting research and potentiality as well.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Agyemang, J., Jayasinghe, K., Adhikari, P., Tunyi, A., & Carmel, S. (2020). Calculative measures of organising and decision-making in developing countries: the case of a quasi-formal organisation in Ghana. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(2), 421–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3911.
Arnold, P.J., & Oakes, L.S. (1998). Accounting as discursive construction: The relationship between statement of financial accounting standards No. 106 and the dismantling of retire health benefits. Accounting, Organization and Society, 23(2), 129–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00005-6.
Banaszkiewicz, A. (2013). Bookkeeping techniques in historical perspective. Copernican Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(1), 21–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2021.012.
Breton-Miller, L., & Miller, D. (2020). Ideals-based accountability and reputation in select family firms. Journal of business ethics, 163(2), 183–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04225-5.
Bryer, R.A. (2000a). The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part one: theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(2), 131–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00032-X.
Bryer, R.A. (2000b). The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part two: evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4–5), 327–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00033-1.
Cai, G., Li, W., & Tang, Z. (2020). Religion and the method of earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(1), 71–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3971-6.
Caramanis, C.V. (2005). Rationalisation, charisma and accounting professionalisation: perspectives on the intra-professional conflict in Greece, 1993–2001. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 195–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.01.002.
Chua, W.F., & Poullaos, C. (1998). The dynamics of “Closure” amidst the construction of market, profession, empire and nationhood: An historical analysis of an Australian Accounting Association, 1886–1903. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(2),155–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00009-3.
Chiapello, E. (2007). Accounting and the birth of the notion of capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(3), 263–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2005.11.012.
Clegg, S., & Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, class and control. Routledge and KeganPaul: London.
Colignon, R., & Covaleski, M. (1991). A Weberian framework in the study of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(2), 141–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90010-C.
Covaleski, M., & Aiken, M. (1986). Accounting and theories of organizations: Some preliminary considerations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(4/5), 297–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(86)90002-4.
De Lautour, V.J., Hoque, Z., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2021). Operationalising ethnicity in accountability: insights from an ethnic group within the Salvation Army. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(8), 1883–1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2013-1450.
Dillard, J.F., Rigsby, J.T., & Goodman, C. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554542.
Jacobs, K., & Walker, S.P. (2004). Accounting and accountability in the Iona Community. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 361–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570410545786.
Jayasinghe, K., Adhikari, P., Carmel, S., & Sopanah, A. (2020). Multiple rationalities of participatory budgeting in indigenous communities: evidence from Indonesia. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(8), 2139–2166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3486.
Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145–1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227128.
Koleva, P. (2021). Towards the development of an empirical model for Islamic corporate social responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(4), 789–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04465-w.
Kuasirikun, N., & Constable, P. (2010). The cosmology of accounting in mid 19th-centuryThailand. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(6), 596–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.01.004.
Leventis, S., Dedoulis, E., & Abdelsalam, O. (2018). The impact of religiosity on audit pricing. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 53–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3001-x.
McPhail, K. (2004). An emotional response to the state of accounting education: developing accounting students’ emotional intelligence. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 629–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00050-9.
Miller, P., & Napier, C. (1993). Genealogies of calculation. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 18(7/8), 631–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90047-A.
Page, M.J, McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods & Reporting, 372:n71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe: Free Press.
Phiri, J. (2020). Tradition, power, and resource wastage: A neo‐patrimonial and Weberian perspective of corruption and accountability in Zambia. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 97–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faam.12272.
Radcliffe, V.S. (1997). Competing rationalities in “special” government audits: The case of NovAtel. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(4), 343–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1996.0115.
Robertson, J., & Funnell, W. (2012). The Dutch East-India Company and accounting for social capital at the dawn of modern capitalism 1602–1623. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 342–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.002.
Swidler, A. (1973). The concept of rationality in the work of Max Weber. Sociological Inquiry, 43(1), 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1973.tb01149.x.
Uddin, S., & Choudhury, J. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustrations from a less‐developed country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1026–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907465.
Uddin, S., Siddiqui, J., & Islam, M.A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosures, traditionalism and politics: A story from a traditional setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 409–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3214-7.
Vollmer, H. (2003). Bookkeeping, accounting, calculative practice: the sociological suspense of calculation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(3), 353–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0392-6.
Waldkirch, R.W., Meyer, M., & Homann, K. (2009). Accounting for the benefits of socialsecurity and the role of business: Four ideal types and their different heuristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 247–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0392-6.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittick. Univ of California Press. London.
Weber, M., & Kalberg, S. (2001). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Routledge: New York.
Weber, M. (1961). General Economic History. New York: Collier Books.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 708
Number of citations: 0
