Aller directement au contenu principal Aller directement au menu principal Aller au pied de page
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Accueil
  • Forthcoming
  • Numéro courant
  • Archives
  • Ethics
  • Annonces
  • À propos
    • À propos de cette revue
    • Soumissions
    • Comité éditorial
    • Déclaration de confidentialité
    • Contact
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL ECONOMY ESTIMATION IN ETHIOPIA: MULTIPLE-INDICATORS, MULTIPLE-CAUSES (MIMIC) APPROACH
  • Accueil
  • /
  • DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL ECONOMY ESTIMATION IN ETHIOPIA: MULTIPLE-INDICATORS, MULTIPLE-CAUSES (MIMIC) APPROACH
  1. Accueil /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 9 No 2 (2020) /
  4. Articles

DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL ECONOMY ESTIMATION IN ETHIOPIA: MULTIPLE-INDICATORS, MULTIPLE-CAUSES (MIMIC) APPROACH

Auteurs

  • Sintayehu Tulu Wondimu Jimma University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-0283
  • Mathewos Woldemariam Birru Wolaita Sodo University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-1212

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2020.008

Mots-clés

informal economy, taxes burden, institutional quality, MIMIC model, Ethiopia

Résumé

This paper explored the determinants of the informal economy size estimations with survey data in the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model. This model enables us to estimate the unknown variable with the known observable variables. The size of the informal economy estimated with observable variables and to conduct the estimation with this model grouped the observable variables of the study as causes and indicators. In the underlying study, the size of informal economy estimations the variables such as harmfulness of shadow economy, growth of money outside banks, taxes burden, the intensity of government regulations, self-employment, unemployment rate, and agricultural sector dominance have the positive effects whereas the real GDP per capita, total employment, institutional quality, and tax morality have negative effects in the estimation of the informal economy size. The study recommended a future line of studies for scholars to undertake the study on the size of the informal economy estimations with the indirect approach using panel data to know the impacts on the regular economy and other related consequences on the economy.

Références

Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Schneider, F. (2004). “Sizing” the Problem of the Hard -to-Tax. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 286, 11-75.

Andersen, E.A., & Andersen, E.A. (2019). The shadow economy. An Ethnic Perspective on Economic Reform, 330-333. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429460098-25.

Cassel, D., & Cichy, U. (1986). Explaining the growing shadow economy in East and West: A comparative systems approach. Comparative Economic Studies, 28(1), 20-41.

Davcik, N.S. (2014). The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: A review and critique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(1), 47-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2013-0043.

Dilnot, A., & Morris, C. N. (1981). What do we know about the black economy? Fiscal Studies, 2(1), 58-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1981.tb00457.x.

Doğan, İ., & Özdamar, K. (2017). The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(9), 7525-7533. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1241409.

Eilat, Y., & Zinnes, C. (2000). The evolution of the shadow economy in transition countries: consequences for economic growth and donor assistance. Harvard Institute for International Development, CAER II Discussion Paper, 83.

Feige, E.L. (2016). Reflections on the Meaning and Measurement of Unobserved Economies: What Do We Really Know About the “Shadow Economy”. Journal of Tax Administration, 2(1), 5-41.

Feld, L.P., & Schneider, F. (2010). Survey on the shadow economy and undeclared earnings in OECD countries. German Economic Review, 11(2), 109-149. https://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v4il.24.

Ferman, P.R., & Ferman, L.A. (1973). The structural underpinnings of the irregular economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 8(1), 1-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/103841117300800101.

Frey, B.S., Weck, H., & Pommerehne, W.W. (1982). Has the shadow economy grown in Germany? An exploratory study. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 118(3), 499-524.

Gutmann, P.M. (1977). The subterranean economy. Financial Analysts Journal, 33(6), 26- -27. https://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v33.n6.26.

Hennessy, M., & Greenberg, J. (1999). Bringing it all together: Modeling intervention processes using structural equation modeling. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(3), 471-480. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821409902000306.

Igudia, E., Ackrill, R., Coleman, S., & Dobson, C. (2016). Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(2/3), 154-177. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2016.076643.

Karakaya-Ozyer, K., & Aksu-Dunya, B. (2018). A Review of Structural Equation Modeling Applications in Turkish Educational Science Literature, 2010-2015. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 279-291. https://dx.doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383177.

Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1.

Kline, R.B. (2010). Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In B. Thompson, R.F. Subotnik (Eds.). Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness. Washington: American Psychological Association. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/12079-007.

Leite, C., & Master, S. (2014). Shadow Economy in Portugal: computation by different approaches. Porto: FEP Economics and Management University of Porto.

McCrohan, K., Smith, J.D., & Adams, T.K. (1991). Consumer purchases in informal markets: estimates for the 1980s, prospects for the 1990s. Journal of Retailing, 67(1), 22-50.

McCrohan, K.F., & Smith, J.D. (1987). Consumer participation in the informal economy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(4), 62-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723291.

Öğünç, F., & Yılmaz, G. (2000). Estimating the underground economy in Turkey. CBRT Research Department Discussion Paper.

Pesut, M. (1992). Statistics of the hidden economy and informal activities inside the production boundary of the national accounts. An overview of national practices. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 9(1), 1-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.20595/jjbf.19.0_3.

Quintin, E. (2014). The Informal Sector in Developing Countries: Output, Assets and Employment. Washington: World Institute for Development Economic Research. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osO/9780199548880.003.0018.

Rafael, G., & Castro, B. (2018). The Informal Economy and Its Impact on Tax Revenues and Economic Growth. Analysis of OCDE members and Latin America Countries (1995- -2016), 0-54.

Sancak, C., Devine, H., Cangul, M., Wu, F., Liu, Y., Nose, M., & Thomas, A. (2017). 3. The Informal Economy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington: Regional Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund.

Schneider, F., & Buehn, A. (2016). Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions. IZA Discussion Paper, 9820.

Schneider, F., & Enste, D. (2002). Hiding in the shadows: the growth of the underground economy. International Monetary Fund, 30.

Schneider, F. (2003). The size and development of the shadow economies and shadow economy labor force of 22 transition and 21 OECD countries: what do we really know? The informal economy in the EU access countries: Size, scope, trends and challenges to the process of EU enlar. Center for Study of Democracy, 23-61.

Schneider, F. (2014). The shadow economy: an essay. Linz: Johannes Kepler University of Linz.

Schneider, F. (2015). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2014: Different Developments? Journal of Self- Governance and Management Economics, 3(4), 7-29. https://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2019).

Singh, A., & Masuku, M. (2014). Sampling Techniques & Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: an Overview. Ijecm.Co.Uk, II(11), 1-22. http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/21131.pdf (accessed: 6.12.2019).

Sison, C.P., & Glaz, J. (1995). Simultaneous confidence intervals and sample size determination for multinomial proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 366-369.

Smith, T.D., & McMillan, B.F. (2001). A Primer of Model Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling. New Orleans: Southwest Educational Research Association.

Trebicka, B. (2014). Mimic Model: A Tool to Estimate the Shadow Economy. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(6), 295-300. https://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ ajis.2014.v3n6p295.

Usp, N., & Winter, S.E.M. (2012). Some Clarifications and Recommendations on Fit Indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 523/623, 1-4.

Williams, C.C., & Schneider, F. (2013). The shadow economy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Téléchargements

  • PDF (English)

Publiée

2020-07-31

Comment citer

1.
WONDIMU, Sintayehu Tulu et BIRRU, Mathewos Woldemariam. DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL ECONOMY ESTIMATION IN ETHIOPIA: MULTIPLE-INDICATORS, MULTIPLE-CAUSES (MIMIC) APPROACH. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 31 juillet 2020. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 65-86. [Accessed 4 juillet 2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2020.008.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Télécharger la référence bibliographique
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numéro

Vol. 9 No 2 (2020)

Rubrique

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 1232
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Explorer l'Index des auteurs
  • Issue archive

User

User

Numéro courant

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informations

  • Pour les lecteurs
  • Pour les auteurs
  • Pour les bibliothécaires

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Langue

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

informal economy, taxes burden, institutional quality, MIMIC model, Ethiopia

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Haut

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop