Bridging Disclosure Gaps: The Role of Institutional Investors in Contingent Liabilities Reporting by Indian Listed Companies
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2025.004Mots-clés
contingent liabilities disclosure, institutional ownership, agency theory, emerging markets, corporate transparencyRésumé
This study addresses an underexplored aspect of disclosure literature by examining how institutional investor heterogeneity – specifically foreign institutional investors (FII) and domestic institutional investors (DII) – influences contingent liabilities disclosure (CLD) in India. Drawing on agency, stakeholder, and resource dependence theories, this research analyzes how institutional investors reduce information asymmetry and enhance corporate transparency. Using data from 430 listed Indian firms spanning 5,483 firm-year observations (2006–2023), regression analysis is employed to assess the differential impacts of FII and DII on CLD, while controlling for firm-specific and sectoral variables. The results demonstrate that institutional ownership significantly enhances CLD, with FII exerting a notably stronger influence compared to DII. Larger firms exhibit higher disclosure levels due to increased scrutiny, whereas growth-oriented firms tend to limit disclosure strategically to protect competitive advantages. Sectoral analysis reveals stricter compliance in Basic Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals industries, with comparatively lower disclosure in the Financial and Technology sectors. The study contributes theoretically by highlighting institutional investors' multifaceted roles as governance agents, stakeholder representatives, and crucial capital providers. These findings offer timely insights for regulators and corporate leaders seeking to improve transparency standards and attract global investment through enhanced disclosure policies.
Références
Alshirah, M., & Alshira’h, A. (2024). The impact of corporate ownership structure on corporate risk disclosure: Evidence from an emerging economy. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 34(2), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2023-0007.
Baazaoui, H. (2020). For a new method of calculating the disclosure index. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 9(2), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2020.005.
Borochin, P., Wang, X., & Wei, S. (2024). Can long-term institutional owners improve market efficiency in parsing complex legal disputes? International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103690.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.
Dyreng, S.D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E.L. (2019). When does tax avoidance result in tax uncertainty? The Accounting Review, 94(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52198.
Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866.
Fidiana, F. (2024). Media pressure and carbon disclosure of Indonesian greenest firms. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 13(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2024.001.
Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066.
Gross, A.D. (2022). Does mandatory disclosure affect recognition of contingent liabilities? Evidence from FIN 48. Journal of Corporate Accounting Finance, 34(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22581.
Hillman, A.J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729.
Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C., & Collins, B.J. (2009). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469.
Hsu, C.-H., Lai, S.-C., & Li, H.-C. (2016). Institutional ownership and information transparency: Role of technology intensities and industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.06.001.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agencycosts and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x.
Khlif, H., Ahmed, K., & Souissi, M. (2016). Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies. Australian Journal of Management, 42(3), 376–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896216641475.
Lin, Y., Mao, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018). Institutional Ownership, Peer Pressure, and Voluntary Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 93(4), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51945.
Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2010). Ultimate ownership structure and corporate disclosure quality: evidence from China. Managerial Finance, 36(5), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011039409.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
Nagata, K., & Nguyen, P. (2017). Ownership structure and disclosure quality: Evidence from management forecasts revisions in Japan. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(6), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.09.003.
Okpala, O.P., & Iredele, O.O. (2018). Corporate social and environmental disclosures andmarket value of listed firms in Nigeria. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 7(3), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2018.013.
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392151.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Shiri, M.M., Salehi, M., & Radbon, A. (2016). A Study of Impact of Ownership Structureand Disclosure Quality on Information Asymmetry in Iran. Vikalpa: The Journal forDecision Makers, 41(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090915620876.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x.
Zhou, T., & Wang, X. (2013). Institutional ownership, risk disclosure, and potential benefits: From the perspective of internal control and firm risk. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 7(4), 535–560. https://doi.org/10.3868/s070-002-013-0023-8.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Srikanth Potharla 2025
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 161
Number of citations: 0
