Aller directement au contenu principal Aller directement au menu principal Aller au pied de page
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Accueil
  • Forthcoming
  • Numéro courant
  • Archives
  • Ethics
  • Annonces
  • À propos
    • À propos de cette revue
    • Soumissions
    • Comité éditorial
    • Déclaration de confidentialité
    • Coordonnées
  • S'inscrire
  • Se connecter
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Selected aspects of due diligence of sovereigns
  • Accueil
  • /
  • Selected aspects of due diligence of sovereigns
  1. Accueil /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012) /
  4. Articles

Selected aspects of due diligence of sovereigns

Auteurs-es

  • Sebastian Hyżyk European Investment Bank, Luxembourg

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2012.005

Mots-clés

due diligence, public debt, sovereign credit rating

Résumé

The purpose of this paper is to present and analyse the prevailing credit rating methodologies, as an element of due diligence process of countries, in the light of the attributes of the sovereigns and associated risks. The concept of sovereignty introduces many variables to the due diligence analysis and in particular to credit risk analysis. The multidimensional character of a sovereign and its complex decision-making process require special attention from the creditors. The prevailing methodologies stress the fact that both quantitative and qualitative elements need to be taken into consideration. Debt affordability, referring to debt size and financial ability to repay it, remains an important factor in a quantitative analysis, but not a decisive one. Qualitative elements such as the assessment of the institutional capacity become essential, since in the case of the sovereigns, the ability to repay does not necessarily imply the willingness to repay. Due diligence of IFIs goes beyond traditional credit risk assessment in the domains, where states ‘surrender’ their sovereignty to the regulation of international law, particularly in the sphere of human rights and environment.

Références

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. A Revised Framework, BIS, Basel.

BIS (2012), BIS Quarterly Review, September 2012.

Eaton J., Gersovitz M., Stiglitz J. E. (1986), The Pure Theory of Country Risk, NBER, Cambridge, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(86)90004-8.

ECB (2006), Acceptance criteria for third-party rating tools within the Eurosystem Credit Assessment Framework. ECB, Frankfurt.

The Equator Principles (2006), A financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social and environmental risk in project financing, http://www.equator-principles.com (retrieved 15.11.2012).

Jackson J. H. (2003), Sovereignty-modern: new approach to an outdated concept, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 97, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3133680.

Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2010), The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues, World Bank, Washington.

Knight F. H (1921, 2000), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Library of Economics and Liberty, http://www.econlib.org (retrieved 20.02.2013).

Moody’s (2008), Sovereign Bond Ratings. Rating methodology, http://www.moodys.com (retrieved 15.11.2012).

OECD (2010), Central Government Debt: Statistical Yearbook 2010, OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2011), Government debt, [in:] OECD Factbook 2011–2012: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Reinhart C. M, Rogoff K. S. (2009), This Time Is Different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Standard and Poor’s (2011), Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions, http://www.standardandpoors.com (retrieved 15.11.2012).

Standard and Poor’s (2012), Sovereign Defaults And Rating Transition Data, 2011 Update, http://www.standardandpoors.com (retrieved 15.11.2012).

Stiglitz J. E. (2000), Economics of the Public Sector (Third Edition), W. W. Norton, London.

US Securities and Exchange Commission (2012), Annual Report on Nationally Recognised Statistical Ratings Organisations, SEC, Washington.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Téléchargements

  • PDF (English)

Publié-e

2013-03-20

Comment citer

1.
HYŻYK, Sebastian. Selected aspects of due diligence of sovereigns. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 20 mars 2013. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65-80. [Accessed 14 février 2026]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2012.005.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Télécharger la référence
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Numéro

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012)

Rubrique

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 794
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Parcourir l'index des auteurs-es
  • Issue archive

User

User

Numéro courant

  • Logo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Renseignements

  • Pour les lecteurs-trices
  • Pour les auteurs-es
  • Pour les bibliothécaires

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Langue

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

due diligence, public debt, sovereign credit rating

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Haut

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop