ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION DETERMINANTS IN THE ECONOMY SECTORS OF LITHUANIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2019.023Palabras clave
environmental pollution, sectors of economic activity, GHGResumen
The research provides substantiation for the problem of environmental pollution in Lithuania on the basis of the increase in the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the country’s individual economy sectors. The research aims at assessing the GHG emissions of individual sectors of economic activities with reference to the key economic indicators of the respective sectors. The performed analysis of the GHG emissions and their determinants in Lithuania has not shown any common trends in GHG emissions and determining factors among the economic activities. The environmental taxes do not perform the goals set for these taxes, while investments into environmental protection have generated a positive effect only in the economic activities of water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation. The relationship between GDP and GHG emissions is significant for certain economic activities only.Citas
Anthony, S., Misselbrook, T., Chadwick, D., Moorby, J., Crompton, L., Topp, K., & Williams, A. (2018). Improving the UK Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. Thünen Working Paper XX, 17.
AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ (accessed: 10.11.2019).
Cherry, T.L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science & Policy, 16, 90-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.007.
Čiulevičienė, V., & Kożuch, A.J. (2015). Effects of the environmental tax reforms. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 37(4), 480-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/mts.2015.40.
Edenhofer, O. (Ed.) (2015). Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ekins, P., & Speck, S. (2011). Competitiveness and Environmental Tax Reform, http://www.greenfiscalcommission.org.uk/images/uploads/gfcBriefing7_PDF_isbn_ v8.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).
Gillingham, K., & Stock, J.H. (2018). The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 53-72. http://http:/dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.53.
Im, T., & Cho, W. (2010). Performance Tools and Their Impact on Pollution Reduction: an Assessment of Environmental Taxation and R&D. International Review of Public Administration, 15(3), 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2011.10805179.
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth?: The transition to a sustainable economy.
Kovats, R.S., Menne, B., McMichael, A.J., Corvalan, C., & Bertollini, R. (2000). Climate Change And Human Health: Impact And Adaptation. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Lietuvos šiltnamio efektą sukeliančių dujų tendencijos Europos Sąjungos (EU-27) kontekste (2011). http://klimatas.gamta.lt/files/LIETUVOS%20ŠILTNAMIO%20EFEKTĄ%20SUKELIANČIŲ%20DUJŲ%20TENDENCIJOS%20EUROPOS%20SĄJUNGO-S%20(EU-27)%20KONTEKSTE1396506686922.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).
Miceikienė, A., & Čiulevičienė, V. (2016). Assessment Of Factors Influencing Environmental Tax Revenues. In Anita Auzina (Ed.). Economic Science For Rural Development: Proceedings Of The International Scientific Conference: New Dimensions In The Development Of Society. Marketing And Sustainable Consumption. Finance And Taxes. Jelgava: Economic Science for Rural Development, 333-341.
Miceikienė, A., Čiulevičienė, V., Rauluškevičienė, J., & Štreimikienė, D. (2018). Assessment Of The Effect Of Environmental Taxes On Environmental Protection. Ekonomický časopis (Journal of Economics), 66(3), 286-308.
Morley, B. (2012). Empirical Evidence On The Effectiveness Of Environmental Taxes. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 1817-1820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.20 11.650324.
OECD (2010). Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries 2010. At a Glance. doi: https:// dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr_oecd-2010-en (accessed: 10.11.2019).
OECD (2017). OECD work on environment 2017-18, http://www.oecd.org/environment/ OECD-work-on-environment-2017-2018.pdf (accessed: 10.11.2019). Official Statistics Portal. https://www.stat.gov.lt/en (accessed: 16.11.2019).
Patterson III, C.D. (2000). Environmental Taxes and Subsidies: What is the Appropriate Fiscal Policy for Dealing with Modern Environmental Problems? William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 24, 121-159.
Policies & Measures and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Lithuania. http:// am.lrv.lt/uploads/am/documents/files/KLIMATO%20KAITA/Studijos%2C%20metodinė%20medžiaga/LT%20PaMs%20and%20projections%20report%202019%20–% 20kopija.pdf (accessed: 15.11.2019).
R Core Team (2017). Substitution of chemicals of concern – Promoting innovation by facilitating partnerships within the bio-economy.
Stern, N., & Taylor, C. (2007). Climate change: Risk, ethics, and the Stern review. Science, 317(5835), 203-204. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1142920.
The 2030 Climate And Energy Framework (2014).
The Paris Agreement (2015).
Wu, J., & Tal, A. (2018). From Pollution Charge to Environmental Protection Tax: A Comparative Analysis of the Potential and Limitations of China’s New Environmental Policy Initiative. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(2), 223-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1361597.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 460
Number of citations: 0
