Salta al contenuto principale Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al piè di pagina del sito
  • Registrazione
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Forthcoming
  • Ultimo fascicolo
  • Archivi
  • Ethics
  • Avvisi
  • Info
    • Sulla rivista
    • Proposte
    • Comitato Scientifico ed Editoriale
    • Dichiarazione sulla privacy
    • Contatti
  • Registrazione
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
  • Home
  • /
  • CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
  1. Home /
  2. Archivi /
  3. V. 11 N. 2 (2022) /
  4. Articles

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Autori

  • Taslima Nasreen Gordon S. Lang School of Business and Economics at the University of Guelph https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4061-9070
  • Ron Baker Gordon S. Lang School of Business and Economics at the University of Guelph https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-7231

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.009

Parole chiave

Canadian government accounting, financial accounting, managerial accounting, auditing, systematic review

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews government accounting research in a developed economy, Canada, and suggests ways to advance knowledge in this area. The purpose of this study is to provide researchers with an up-to-date overview of the field of Canadian government accounting research. The methodology consisted of a structured literature search to select and analyze academic papers according to the thematic objectives of this study. Our review covers 29 articles published in accounting, finance, and public administration journals over 42 years. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review has been done in Canadian government accounting. This study examines Canadian government accounting research coverage in financial, managerial, and auditing categories to date. This review identifies some under-explored areas, such as political influence on government managerial accounting practice, as well as unexplored areas, such as the influence of the internationally accepted conceptual framework on the quality of government accounting. This study contributes to the literature on government accounting by providing a review of the current literature and suggesting future research areas. This will be useful to researchers and practitioners in government accounting.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Alawattage, C., Hopper, T., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2007). Introduction to management accounting in less developed countries. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 3(3), 183–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/18325910710820256.

Auld, D.A.L. (1984). Prediction Accuracy and the Canadian Federal Budget. Futures,16(5), 513–520.

Baker, R. (2019). Special issue: Government accounting, auditing and accountability: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 36(2), 288–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1536.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2006). Forces Leading to the Adoption of Accrual Accounting by the Canadian Federal Government: An Institutional Perspective. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5(1), 83–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1506/206K-RV7L-2JMNW3D3.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2011). Net debt in the Canadian public accounts: Its emergence, evolution and entrenchment. Canadian Public Administration, 54(3), 359–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2011.00180.x.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2012). Accounting for a nation’s beginnings: Challenges arising from the formation of the Dominion of Canada. Accounting History, 17(3–4),415–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1032373212443225.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2013). An institutional perspective on the development of Canada’s first public accounts. Accounting History, 18(1), 31–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1032373212463270.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2017). A public sector accounting technology and its association with a transition to responsible government. Accounting History Review, 27(2), 115–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2016.1264984.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M.D. (2018). The creation and acceptance of public sector accounting standards in Canada. Accounting History, 23(3), 407–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1032373217748949.

Baxter, J.J., & Chua, W.F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research – whence and whither. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 28(2–3), 97–126.

Bourgault, J., Dion, S., & Lemay, M. (1993). Creating a corporate culture: Lessons from the Canadian fed. Public Administration Review, 53(1), 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/977279.

Brimberg, J., & Hurley, W. J. (2014). The Problem of Lapsed Funding and The Knee-Jerk Better Information System: The Case of the Department of National Defence in Canada. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(1), 81–89.

Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of contextual accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 129–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854383.

Bruce, V., & Warren, M. (2018). Progressive public administration and new public management in public sector accountancy. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(1), 44–69.

Buhr, N. (2012). Accrual accounting by Anglo-American governments: Motivations, developments, and some tensions over the last 30 years. Accounting History, 17(3–4), 287–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1032373212443956.

Busby, C., & Robson, W.B.P. (2011). Impulse Spending: Canada’s 2011 Fiscal Accountability Rankings. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

Busby, C., & Robson, W.B.P. (2013). Canada’s 2012 Fiscal Accountability Rankings. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

Carmela D.M., Ancarani, A., & Hartley, T. (2020). Unravelling SMEs’ Participation and Success in Public Procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(4), 377–401.https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-2018-0013.

Chan, Y.C.L. (2004). Use of Capital Budgeting Techniques and an Analytic Approach to Capital Investment Decisions in Canadian Municipal Governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(2), 40–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.02402003.x.

Cooper, D.J., & Robson, K. (2006). Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating sites of professionalization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 415–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.003.

Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan, A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. New York: Sage Publications.

Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001.

Fortin, A., Haffaf, H., & Viger, C. (2007). The Measurement of Success of Activity-Based Costing and Its Determinants: A Study within Canadian Federal Government Organizations. Accounting Perspectives, 6(3), 231–262.

Gendron, Y., Cooper, D.J., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1– 2), 101–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.005.

Goddard, A. (2010). Contemporary public sector accounting research; an international comparison of journal papers. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 75–87.

Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review ofresults, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.

Hyżyk, S. (2013). Selected Aspects of Due Diligence of Sovereigns. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 1(1), 65–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2012.005.

Jacobs, K. (2012). Making sense of social practice: theoretical pluralism in public sector accounting research. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00534.x.

Jarvis, M.D. (2009). The Adoption of the Accounting Officer System in Canada: Changing Relationships? Canadian Public Administration, 52(4), 525–547.

Liguori, M. (2012). Radical Change, Accounting and Public Sector Reforms: A Comparison of Italian and Canadian Municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management ,28(4), 437–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00555.x.

Lin, Z.J. (1993). Harmonization of Financial Reporting by Governments in Canada. Financial Accountability & Management, 9(1), 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1993.tb00363.x.

Lin, Z.J., Baxter, G.C., & Murphy, G.J. (1993). Improving Government Financial Reporting in Canada: An Evaluation of Compliance with the PSAAC’s Accounting and Reporting Standards for Governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 9(4), 235–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1993.tb00376.x.

Mahood, Q., Van Eerd D., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for Grey Literature for Systematic Reviews: Challenges and Benefits. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(3), 221–234.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1106.

Pollanen, R., & Loiselle-Lapointe, K. (2012). Accounting Reform in the Government of Canada: Exploratory Evidence on Accrual Accounting Adoption and Impact. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(4), 359–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00551.x.

Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in the Pos positivist Traditions. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

PS 1000: Assets, Public Sector Accounting Standards, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook, Canada.

PS 1100: Objectives, Public Sector Accounting Standards, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook, Canada.

PSAcS 3 (1986). General Standards of Financial Statements Presentation for Governments, Public Sector Accounting and Auditing Committee, Canada.

PSAcS 4 (1988). Defining the Government Reporting Entity. Public Sector Accounting and Auditing Committee, Canada.

Reddick, C.G. (2004). Rational Expectation Theory and Macro Budgetary Decision-Making: Comparative Analysis of Canada, UK, and USA. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 16(3), 316–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-16-03-2004-B001.

Robson, W. B. P., & Laurin, A. (2015). Challenges, Growth and Opportunity: A Shadow Federal Budget for 2015. Commentary – C.D. Howe Institute, 423(2), 1–23.

Savoie, D.J. (1990). Reforming the expenditure budget process: The Canadian experience. Public Budgeting and Finance, 10(3), 62–78.

Scapens, R.W., & Bromwich, M. (2010). Management accounting research: 20 years on. Management Accounting Research, 21(4), 278–284.

Stoney, C., & Krawchenko, T. (2012). Transparency and accountability in infrastructure stimulus spending: A comparison of Canadian, Australian and U.S. programs. Canadian Public Administration, 55(4), 481–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00235.x.

Uslaner, E.M. (2002). Religion and Civic Engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 239–254.

Van Helden, G.J. (2005). Researching public sector transformation: the role of management accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(1), 99–133.

Van Helden, J., & Uddin, S. (2016). Public sector management accounting in emerging economies: A literature review. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 41, 34–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.01.001.

Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Downloads

  • PDF (English)

Pubblicato

2022-12-23

Come citare

1.
NASREEN, Taslima e BAKER, Ron. CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 23 dicembre 2022. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 71-97. [Accessed 12 dicembre 2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2022.009.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Scarica citazione
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Fascicolo

V. 11 N. 2 (2022)

Sezione

Articles

Licenza

Creative Commons License

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 885
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Scorri l'indice per Autori
  • Issue archive

User

User

Ultimo numero

  • Lodo Atom
  • Logo RSS2
  • Logo RSS1

Informazioni

  • per i lettori
  • Per gli autori
  • Per i bibliotecari

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Lingua

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Canadian government accounting, financial accounting, managerial accounting, auditing, systematic review

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Su

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop