DISCLOSING NON-FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN COMPANIES’ REPORTS IN CROATIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.022Schlagworte
companies’ reports, disclosure of non-financial information, Directive 2014/95/EU, GRI, KPIs, sustainability indicatorsAbstract
Subsequent to the provision of the Directive 2014/95/EU requiring disclosure of non-financial and diversity information of all EU Member States companies with 500 and more employees, a research was conducted at the beginning of 2016 on a sample of sustainability reports disclosed by Croatian companies in 2014 that had registered 400 and more employees in that same year, with an assumption of their growth by 2018 in terms of the number of their employees. This research was focused on the structure of the indicators identified in non-financial reports, viewed as content-oriented and entry-oriented measures (attributes). The indicators analyzed were extracted from the original research done on the quality of non-financial reports of the companies in Croatia registering 400 and more employees. The method employed was a content analysis. The results show that many of the disclosed sustainability indicators are “story-tellers”, meaning that they are past-oriented and qualitatively stated, suggesting that activities concerning sustainability in company are present, but no cause-effect relationships are presented therein. The results point to a need for significant improvements in defining a minimum of requirements for the indicators disclosed in non-financial reports. Since very few indicators reflect all of the attributes assessed in this research, there is a need for finding ways to capture relevant data in accounting of enterprises, so as to establish a requirement for comparability of non-financial information disclosed in sustainability reports and thus bring about the requirements of the Directive 2014/95/EU.
Literaturhinweise
Burns, R. B. (2000.) Introduction to research methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Brockett, A., & Rezaee, Z. (Ed.) (2012). Corporate Sustainability: Integrating Performance and Reporting. Google Books. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., https://books.google.hr/books?id=mnEE0XQrWKUC&printsec=frontcover &source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/9781119202899 (accessed: 22. 07. 2016).
BusinessDictionary.com. BusinessDictionary.com – Online Business Dictionary, http:// www.businessdictionary.com/ (accessed: 16.10.2015).
Center for Instructional Technolgy. What is Quality Improvement? http://patientsafetyed. duhs.duke.edu/module_a/measurement/measurement.html (accessed: 28.11.2016).
Choi, F.D.S. (2003). International Finance and Accounting Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, https:// books.google.com/books?id=5z2pGMGE8mYC&pgis=1 (accessed: 16.10.2015).
Cokins, G. (2009). Performance management. Integrating Strategy Execution, Methodologies, Risk and Analytics. New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons, Inc. Croatian Chamber of Economy.
Croatian Company Directory, http://www1.biznet.hr/ HgkWeb/do/language?lang=en_GB (accessed: 10. 12. 2015).
EC. (2013). Directive 2013/34/EU amending Directive 2006/43/EC and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings. Official Journal of the European Union, 2013(June), L 182/19-75.
EC. Directive 2014/95/EU, Official Journal of the European Union 1–9 (2014). http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from= HR (accessed: 28.12.2016).
EPA. (2011). Sustainability Assessment and Management: Process, Tools, and Indicators. National Academy of Sciences. doi: http://doi.org/10.17226/13152.
Epstein, M.J., & Buhovac, A.R. (2014). Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Berrett- Koehler Publishers, https://books.google.com/books?id=RfvxAAAAQBAJ&pgis=1 (accessed: 28.12.2016).
GEMI. (1998). Measuring Environmental Performance: A primer and Survey of Metric In Use. Global Environmental Management Initiative, http://gemi.org/Resources/ MET_101.pdf (accessed: 28.12.2016).
GISR. (2015). GISR | Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings, http://ratesustainability. org/about/why-gisr/ (accessed: 28.12.2016).
GRI. (2014a). G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, 1–97. https://www.globalreporting. org/standards/g4/Pages/default.aspx (accessed: 28.12.2016).
GRI. (2014b). GRI G4 Implementation Manual. Global Reporting Initiative, 1–112, https:// www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles- and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf (accessed: 28.12.2016).
Hair, J.F.J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis.
Hartman, D. What Is the Difference Between an Absolute & a Relative Measure of Forecasting Error? The Finance Base, http://thefinancebase.com/difference-betweenabsolute- relative-measure-forecasting-error-2177.html (accessed: 01.12.2016).
Herriott, S.R. (2016). Metrics for Sustainable Business, New York, US: Routledge.
Horvat, J., & Mijoč, J. (2012). Osnove statistike, Naklada ljevak, Zagreb, Croatia.
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. http://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.1997.628729.
Perrini, F. (2005). Building a European portrait of corporate social responsibility reporting. European Management Journal, 23(6), 611–627. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. emj.2005.10.008.
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (Eds.) (2006). Sustainability Accounting and Reporting – FAQ. Delft: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3.
Sustainable Stock Exchange Inititive. Sustainability Reporting Policies, Sustainable Stock Exchanges, http://www.sseinitiative.org/sustainabilityreporting/ (accessed: 01.01.2015).
Šošić, I. (2006). Primijenjena statistika, Školska knjiga, Zagreb, Croatia.
Windolph, S. E. (2011). Assessing Corporate Sustainability Through Ratings: Challenges and Their Causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 61–80. http:// doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0005.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 548
Number of citations: 0