Přeskočit na hlavní obsah Přeskočit na hlavní navigační menu Přeskočit na patičku stránky
  • Registrace
  • Přihlášení
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Domů
  • Forthcoming
  • Aktuální
  • Archivy
  • Ethics
  • Oznámení
  • Podrobnosti
    • O časopise
    • Příspěvky
    • Editorský tým
    • Zásady zachování soukromí
    • Kontakt
  • Registrace
  • Přihlášení
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

LIQUIDITY-PROFITABILITY TRADEOFF EXISTENCE IN TURKEY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION UNDER STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
  • Domů
  • /
  • LIQUIDITY-PROFITABILITY TRADEOFF EXISTENCE IN TURKEY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION UNDER STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
  1. Domů /
  2. Archivy /
  3. Vol 5 No 2 (2016) /
  4. Articles

LIQUIDITY-PROFITABILITY TRADEOFF EXISTENCE IN TURKEY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION UNDER STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Autoři

  • Furkan Baser Department of Insurance and Actuarial Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara
  • Soner Gokten Department of Management, Baskent University, Baskent Universitesi, Baglica Kampusu Eskisehir Yolu 20. km, IIBF, Isletme Bolumu, 06810, Ankara
  • Guray Kucukkocaoglu Department of Management, Baskent University, Ankara
  • Hasan Ture Department of Econometrics, Gazi University, Ankara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.013

Klíčová slova

liquidity-profitability tradeoff, structural equation modeling, working capital management

Abstrakt

Firms in emerging markets could show a tendency to have high liquidity positions by ignoring the liquidity-profitability tradeoff in terms of working capital management due to gained experiences from stressed times. Accordingly, this study empirically examines the validity of liquidity-profitability tradeoff in Turkish market via structural equation modeling. The functions of liquidity and profitability as latent variables of the model are constituted from Piotroski’s criterias of liquidity/solvency, operating efficiency and profitability. The hypothesized model for the inexistence of the validity of liquidity-profitability tradeoff was verified and there is a moderate level of positive effect between liquidity and profitability in Turkey. The findings indicate that (1) current ratio or its variants as single-handed variables are inadequate to explain liquidity- profitability relation and (2) leverage seems to be the most important indicator as taken into account on working capital management decisions. Turkish firms apply prudent working capital management to overcome possible liquidity shocks.

Reference

Akoto, R.K., Awunyo-Vitor, D., & Angmor, P.L. (2013). Working capital management and profitability: Evidence from Ghanaian listed manufacturing firms. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 5(9), p. 373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ JEIF2013.0539.

Baumol, W.J. (1952). The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 545–556. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1882104.

Boateng, A. (2004). Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from international joint ventures in Ghana. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(1/2), pp. 56-66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290410515411.

Boer, G. (1999). Managing the cash gap. Journal of Accountancy, 188(4), pp. 27–32.

Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), pp. 87–130. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/0022-1082.00320.

Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 132–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, New York: Taylor & Francis.

Chen, J.J. (2004). Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), pp. 1341–1351. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0148-2963(03)00070-5.

DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R.W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), pp. 3–29. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0304-405X(80)90019-7.

Eljelly, A.M. (2004). Liquidity-profitability tradeoff: an empirical investigation in an emerging market. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(2), pp. 48–61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10569210480000179.

Faulkender, M., & Petersen, M.A. (2006). Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 45–79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/ hhj003.

Garcia, P.J.C., Rivero, M.S., & Fernandez, J.I.P. (2013). Does Tourism Growth Influence Economic Development?, Journal of Travel Research, 54(2), pp. 206–221.

Gaud, P., Jani, E., Hoesli, M. & Bender, A. (2005). The capital structure of Swiss companies: an empirical analysis using dynamic panel data. European Financial Management, 11(1), pp. 51–69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00275.x.

Gentry, J.A., Vaidyanathan, R. & Lee, H.W. (1990). A weighted cash conversion cycle. Financial Management, pp. 90–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3666040.

Gitman, L.J. (1974). Estimating corporate liquidity requirements: a simplified approach. The Financial Review, 9(1), pp. 79–88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1974. tb01453.x.

Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), pp. 297–355. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x.

Hawawini, G., Viallet, C., & Vora, A. (1986). Industry influence on corporate working capital decisions, Sloan Management Review, 15–24.

Iatridis, G., & Kadorinis, G. (2009). Earnings management and firm financial motives: A financial investigation of UK listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18(4), pp. 164–173.

Johnson, J., & Aggarwal, A. (1988). Cash management comes to the ball. Accountancy, 102(1144), pp. 81–86.

Joreskog, K., Sorbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Jung, K., & Kim, B. (2008). Corporate Cash Holdings and Tax-induced Debt Financing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 37(6), pp. 983–1023.

Kale, J.R., & Shahrur, H. (2007). Corporate capital structure and the characteristics of suppliers and customers. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(2), pp. 321–365. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.007.

Kamath, R. (1989). How useful are common liquidity measures. Journal of Cash Management, 9(1), pp. 24–28.

Kline, B.R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

Kling, G., Paul, S.Y., & Gonis, E. (2014). Cash holding, trade credit and access to shortterm bank finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 32, pp. 123–131. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.01.013.

Koc, T., Turan, A.H., & Okursoy, A. (2016). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system in higher education: An empirical study with structural equation modeling. The International Journal of Management Education, 14, pp. 286–300.

MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), pp. 201–226. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.

MacKay, P., & Phillips, G.M. (2005). How does industry affect firm financial structure? Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), pp. 1433–1466. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/ hhi032.

Miller, M.H., & Orr, D. (1966). A Model of the Demand for Money by Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 413–435. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1880728.

Modi, S. (2012). A study on the adequacy and efficacy of working capital in automobile industry in India. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 11(2), p. 69.

Nicolas, C. (1991). When the numbers do not add up. Director, 44 (6), pp. 61–68.

Padron Y.G., Apolinario R.M.C., Santana O.M, Conception M, Martel V., & Sales L.J. (2005). Determinant factors of leverage: an empirical analysis of Spanish corporations. Journal of Risk Finance, 6(1), pp. 60–68.

Piotroski, J.D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(3), pp. 1–41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2672906.

Rajan, R.G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), pp. 1421–1460.

Raspanti, T.M. (2000). What’s New with Trade Credit Insurance? An Update on the US Marketplace. Business Credit–New York, 102(10), pp. 84–87.

Richards, V.D., & Laughlin, E.J. (1980). A cash conversion cycle approach to liquidity analysis. Financial Management, pp. 32–38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665310.

Rubio, G., & Sogorb-Mira, F. (2012). Adjustment costs and the realization of target leverage of Spanish public firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad, 41(156), pp. 547–564. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/02102412.2012.10779735.

Sanger, J.S. (2001). Working capital: A modern approach, Financial Executive, p. 69.

The firm-specific determinants of corporate capital structure: Evidence from Turkish panel data. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3(3), pp. 125–139.

Schneider, A.J. (1988). Beyond managing cash, to managing cash flow. Financial Executive (November/December, 1988), pp. 54–57.

Schulman, C.T., Thomas, D.W., Sellers, K. F., & Kennedy, D.B. (1996). Effects of tax integration and capital gains tax on corporate leverage. National Tax Journal, pp. 31–54.

Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.

Shook, C.L., Ketchen, D.J., Hult, G.T.M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), pp. 397–404. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.385.

Strebulaev, I.A. (2007). Do tests of capital structure theory mean what they say? The Journal of Finance, 62(4), pp. 1747–1787. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6261.2007.01256.x.

Summers, B., & Wilson, N. (2000). Trade credit management and the decision to use factoring: an empirical study. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(1–2), pp. 37–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00305.

Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), pp. 1–19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988. tb02585.x.

Unsworth, E. (2000). Swiss Re, Moody’s foresee growth for trade credit market. Business Insurance, 4(48), pp. 15–16.

Uremandu, S., Ben-Caleb, E., & Enyi, P.E. (2012). Working capital management, liquidity and Corporate profitability among quoted firms in Nigeria: Evidence from the Productive sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2(1).

Wald, J.K., & Long, M.S. (2007). The effect of state laws on capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(2), pp. 297–319. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco. 2005.10.008.

Wiwattanakantang, Y. (1999). An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7(3), pp. 371–403. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(99)00007-4.

Zakaria, N.B., & Amin, J.M. (2013). Working capital financing and management in Malaysian construction companies. Journal of Current Issues in Finance, Business and Economics, 6(2/3), p. 287.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Stahování

  • PDF (English)

Publikováno

2017-03-09

Jak citovat

1.
BASER, Furkan, GOKTEN, Soner, KUCUKKOCAOGLU, Guray a TURE, Hasan. LIQUIDITY-PROFITABILITY TRADEOFF EXISTENCE IN TURKEY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION UNDER STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 9 březen 2017. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 27-44. [Accessed 6 červenec 2025]. DOI 10.12775/CJFA.2016.013.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Stánhout citace
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Číslo

Vol 5 No 2 (2016)

Sekce

Articles

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 806
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Procházet index autorů
  • Issue archive

User

User

Aktuální číslo

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Informace

  • Pro čtenáře
  • Pro autory
  • Pro knihovníky

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Jazyk

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

liquidity-profitability tradeoff, structural equation modeling, working capital management

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Nahoru

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop