Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Język Polski
    • Español (España)
    • Italiano
    • Français (Canada)
    • Čeština
    • Français (France)
    • Hrvatski
    • Srpski
    • Українська
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Forthcoming
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Ethics
  • Submissions
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets
  • Home
  • /
  • Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming /
  4. Articles

Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets

Authors

  • Changjie Hu Niagara University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-2763
  • Zhu Chen Southwestern University of Finance and Economics https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3961-400X
  • Ting Cao MacEwan University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-7742

Keywords

credit unions, tangibility, land and buildings, fixed assets, foreclosed assets, risk, growth

Abstract

This study examines how tangible non-loan assets relate to risk, balance sheet resilience, and growth in U.S. credit unions. Using NCUA call report data, the analysis measures total tangibility and decomposes it into planned tangibility, captured by premises and other fixed assets, and shock-driven tangibility, captured by foreclosed and repossessed assets obtained through workout and recovery. This decomposition separates slower moving operating investment from distress-related collateral holdings that become embedded on the non-loan side of the balance sheet. In fixed-effects panel regressions with lagged explanatory variables, controls, and high-dimensional fixed effects, higher tangibility is associated with thinner capital buffers and weaker economic solvency, alongside higher delinquency and net charge-offs, with materially stronger associations for the shock-driven component. These links intensify in crisis periods and vary with institutional scale and capital buffers, with the adverse associations generally stronger during stress periods and weaker at larger and better-capitalized credit unions. Moreover, planned tangibility is positively related to loan and member growth, but negatively related to asset growth, while shock-driven tangibility is strongly negative across growth outcomes. Overall, the evidence suggests that non-loan asset composition provides incremental information about both strategic capacity and distress dynamics and the trade-off between growth and resilience in a sector where retained earnings are central to resilience.

References

Bauer, K. (2008). Detecting abnormal credit union performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.04.022.

Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 339-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009.

Berger, A.N., & Bouwman, C.H.S. (2013). How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 146-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.008.

Berger, A.N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), 849-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4.

Berger, A.N., & Mester, L.J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00010-1.

Berger, A.N., Leusner, J.H., & Mingo, J.J. (1997). The efficiency of bank branches. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00035-4.

Boda, M. (2017). The impact of the 2007–2009 financial crisis on risk management in credit institutions. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2016.014.

Bushman, R.M., & Williams, C.D. (2012). Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks' risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.04.002.

Bushman, R.M., & Williams, C.D. (2015). Delayed expected loss recognition and the risk profile of banks. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 511-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12079.

Calem, P.S., & Rob, R. (1999). The impact of capital-based regulation on bank risk-taking: A dynamic model. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(4), 317-352. https://doi.org/10.1006/JFIN.1999.0276.

El Fadil, J., & Hessou, H. (2024). Performance and assets and liabilities management in the US credit union. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 14(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1416.

Foos, D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). Loan growth and riskiness of banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.007.

Goddard, J.A., McKillop, D., & Wilson, J.O.S. (2014). US credit unions: Survival, consolidation and growth. Economic Inquiry, 52(1), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12032.

Goddard, J., McKillop, D., & Wilson, J.O. (2008). The diversification and financial performance of US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1836-1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.015.

Gomez-Biscarri, J., López-Espinosa, G., & Mesa-Toro, A. (2021). The risk implications of the business loan activity in credit unions. Journal of Financial Stability, 56, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100932.

Harding, J.P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V.W. (2012). The foreclosure discount: Myth or reality?. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.09.005.

Hirtle, B.J. (2007). The impact of network size on bank branch performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12), 3782-3805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.01.020.

Hu, C., Chen, Z., & Cao, T. (2026). Mission Drift or Strategic Expansion? Non-Core Lending, Risk, and Capital in US Credit Unions. Risks, 14(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14020032.

Jacques, K., & Nigro, P. (1997). Risk-based capital, portfolio risk, and bank capital: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Economics and Business, 49(6), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00038-6.

McKillop, D.G., & Wilson, J.O.S. (2011). Credit unions: A theoretical and empirical overview. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 20(3), 79-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0416.2011.00166.x.

Peek, J., & Rosengren, E.S. (1997). The international transmission of financial shocks: The case of Japan. American Economic Review, 87(4), 495-505.

Ramcharan, R. (2020). Banks’ balance sheets and liquidation values: Evidence from real estate collateral. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(2), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz056.

Shrieves, R.E., & Dahl, D. (1992). The relationship between risk and capital in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16(2), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(92)90024-T.

Smith, D.J., Cargill, T.F., & Meyer, R.A. (1981). An economic theory of a credit union. The Journal of Finance, 36(2), 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00470.x.

Van Rijn, J. (2022). The cooperative identity at US credit unions. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 10(1), 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100152.

Wheelock, D.C., & Wilson, P.W. (2011). Are credit unions too small? Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1343-1359. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00121.

Wheelock, D.C., & Wilson, P.W. (2013). The evolution of cost-productivity and efficiency among US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.003.

Wilcox, J.A. (2005). Economies of scale and continuing consolidation of credit unions. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter, 2005-29.

Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

1.
HU, Changjie, CHEN, Zhu and CAO, Ting. Tangibility, Risk, Resilience, and Growth in U.S. Credit Unions: Evidence from Planned and Shock-Driven Non-Loan Assets. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. Online. 14 June 2026. Vol. 15, no. 2. [Accessed 15 June 2026].
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Forthcoming

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 0
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Język Polski
  • Español (España)
  • Italiano
  • Français (Canada)
  • Čeština
  • Français (France)
  • Hrvatski
  • Srpski
  • Українська

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

credit unions, tangibility, land and buildings, fixed assets, foreclosed assets, risk, growth

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop